1.A Case of Male-Pseudohermaphroditism due to 17-beta-hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Deficiency with Multiple Osteoporosis.
Sae Chang BANG ; Jae Ho HA ; Jin Ho KIM ; So Jeung KIM ; Kyung Rok SEUNG ; Jong Hyun CHOI
Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1997;40(9):2097-2104
A 37-year-old woman was admitted for chief complaints about primary amenorrhea and multiple bone pains. She was raised phenotypically female but her chromosomal study was no-rmal male karyotype(46 XY). On pelvic examination, she showed relatively normal female ex-ternal genitalia except short blind-ending vagina. There were also no uterus and tubes in operation field. Even though rare disorder, she was diagnosed male pseudohermaphroditism due to 17-beta -hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase deficiency. This disorder is the most common enzyme defect in biosynthesis of testosterone and involves the last step. The serum level of sex steroid: test osterone, estradiol were decreased and FSH, LH were increased. Androstenedione was increased and we could obtain that Androstenedione / Testosterone ratio was increased. Because of 17-beta-HSD deficiency, estrogen was not converted to estradiol, and so estradiol was markedly decreased. Same as above, we experienced a case of male pseudohermaphroditism due to 17-beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase deficiency with multiple osteoporosis. So we report this case with a brief review of literatures.
46, XY Disorders of Sex Development
;
Adult
;
Amenorrhea
;
Androstenedione
;
Estradiol
;
Estrogens
;
Female
;
Genitalia
;
Gynecological Examination
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Osteoporosis*
;
Oxidoreductases*
;
Testosterone
;
Uterus
;
Vagina
2.A Phase I Study of Oral Paclitaxel with a Novel P-Glycoprotein Inhibitor, HM30181A, in Patients with Advanced Solid Cancer.
Hyun Jung LEE ; Dae Seog HEO ; Joo Youn CHO ; Sae Won HAN ; Hye Jung CHANG ; Hyeon Gyu YI ; Tae Eun KIM ; Se Hoon LEE ; Do Youn OH ; Seock Ah IM ; In Jin JANG ; Yung Jue BANG
Cancer Research and Treatment 2014;46(3):234-242
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, pharmacokinetics, and recommended phase II dose of an oral drug composed of paclitaxel and HM30181A, which is an inhibitor of P-glycoprotein, in patients with advanced cancers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced solid tumors received standard therapy were given the study drug at escalating doses, using a 3+3 design. The study drug was orally administered on days 1, 8, and 15, with a 28-day cycle of administration. The dose of paclitaxel was escalated from 60 to 420 mg/m2, and the dose of HM30181A was escalated from 30-210 mg/m2. RESULTS: A total of twenty-four patients were enrolled. Only one patient experienced a dose-limiting toxicity-a grade 3 neutropenia that persisted for more than 2 weeks, at 240 mg/m2 of paclitaxel. MTD was not reached. The maximum plasma concentration was obtained at a dose level of 300 mg/m2 and the area under the curve of plasma concentration-time from 0 to the most recent plasma concentration measurement of paclitaxel was reached at a dose level of 420 mg/m2. The absorption of paclitaxel tends to be limited at doses that exceed 300 mg/m2. The effective plasma concentration of paclitaxel was achieved at a dose of 120 mg/m2. Responses of 23 patients were evaluated; 8 (34.8%) had stable disease and 15 (65.2%) had progressive disease. CONCLUSION: The study drug appears to be well tolerated, and the effective plasma concentration of paclitaxel was achieved. The recommended phase II dose for oral paclitaxel is 300 mg/m2.
Absorption
;
Humans
;
Maximum Tolerated Dose
;
Neutropenia
;
P-Glycoprotein*
;
Paclitaxel*
;
Pharmacokinetics
;
Plasma
3.Management of Male Infertility with Coexisting Sexual Dysfunction: A Consensus Statement and Clinical Recommendations from the Asia-Pacific Society of Sexual Medicine (APSSM) and the Asian Society of Men’s Health and Aging (ASMHA)
Eric CHUNG ; Jiang HUI ; Zhong Cheng XIN ; Sae Woong KIM ; Du Geon MOON ; Yiming YUAN ; Koichi NAGAO ; Lukman HAKIM ; Hong-Chiang CHANG ; Siu King MAK ; Gede Wirya Kusuma DUARSA ; Yutian DAI ; Bing YAO ; Hwancheol SON ; William HUANG ; Haocheng LIN ; Quang NGUYEN ; Dung Ba Tien MAI ; Kwangsung PARK ; Joe LEE ; Kavirach TANTIWONGSE ; Yoshikazu SATO ; Bang-Ping JIANN ; Christopher HO ; Hyun Jun PARK
The World Journal of Men's Health 2024;42(3):471-486
Male infertility (MI) and male sexual dysfunction (MSD) can often coexist together due to various interplay factors such as psychosexual, sociocultural and relationship dynamics. The presence of each form of MSD can adversely impact male reproduction and treatment strategies will need to be individualized based on patients’ factors, local expertise, and geographical socioeconomic status. The Asia Pacific Society of Sexual Medicine (APSSM) and the Asian Society of Men’s Health and Aging (ASMHA) aim to provide a consensus statement and practical set of clinical recommendations based on current evidence to guide clinicians in the management of MI and MSD within the Asia-Pacific (AP) region. A comprehensive, narrative review of the literature was performed to identify the various forms of MSD and their association with MI. MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for the following English language articles under the following terms: “low libido”, “erectile dysfunction”, “ejaculatory dysfunction”, “premature ejaculation”, “retrograde ejaculation”, “delayed ejaculation”, “anejaculation”, and “orgasmic dysfunction” between January 2001 to June 2022 with emphasis on published guidelines endorsed by various organizations. This APSSM consensus committee panel evaluated and provided evidence-based recommendations on MI and clinically relevant MSD areas using a modified Delphi method by the panel and specific emphasis on locoregional socioeconomic-cultural issues relevant to the AP region. While variations exist in treatment strategies for managing MI and MSD due to geographical expertise, locoregional resources, and sociocultural factors, the panel agreed that comprehensive fertility evaluation with a multidisciplinary management approach to each MSD domain is recommended. It is important to address individual MI issues with an emphasis on improving spermatogenesis and facilitating reproductive avenues while at the same time, managing various MSD conditions with evidence-based treatments. All therapeutic options should be discussed and implemented based on the patient’s individual needs, beliefs and preferences while incorporating locoregional expertise and available resources.