OBJECTIVETrauma is one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity in adults and a major contributor to health care expenditures. Although spine-related injuries constitute a small proportion of trauma cases, they need special consideration due to poor functional outcomes and substantial burden. Despite relatively extensive previous studies on traumatic spinal injuries, there is still obscurity in some aspects of the issue. The purpose of this study is to establish a regional multicenter traumatic spine fracture/dislocation registry.

METHODSThis is a prospective case series study, including all patients with acute traumatic spine lesions admitted to a regional multicenter since 2014. Data is extracted based upon a form developed by Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Novel electronic data entry software is initiated and data will be entered to the software. Information remains confidential and security considerations will be taken based on standards of data entry systems.

RESULTSThe results of this study will include age and gender distribution of the patients, causes of injury, location of pain and neurological deficit, the American Spinal Injury Association score and Frankel grade on admission, at discharge, after 6 and 12 months and at the latest annual follow-up, radiologic findings, details of operative procedures and methods of external fixation.

CONCLUSIONThis study will identify prognostic factors that influence the ultimate fate of spine fracture patients and determine short and long-term outcome of different treatment methods. It can lead to a considerable improvement in patient care and will have a great national and transnational impact.

Humans ; Iran ; epidemiology ; Joint Dislocations ; epidemiology ; Prospective Studies ; Registries ; Spinal Fractures ; epidemiology ; Spinal Injuries ; epidemiology

PURPOSETrauma is an inevitable part of the health burden in every country. Both the preventive and rehabilitative aspects of traumatic injuries are expensive. Since most of the injuries happen in low- and middle-income developing countries, a judicious allocation of the limited resources to the most costefficient strategies is necessary. The present study was designed to report the causes of trauma, injured body regions, trauma severity scores and the one year survival rate of a randomly selected sample of trauma patients in a major referral hospital in Tehran, Iran.

METHODSWe chose and analyzed a random subgroup of traumatic patients admitted during the oneyear period of May 2012 to May 2013 to Shariati Hospital, a major University Teaching Hospital in Tehran, Iran. Patients who stayed at the hospital for less than 24 h were excluded. In total, 73 traumatic patients were registered. The mean age was (40.19 ± 20.34) years and 67.1% of them were male.

RESULTSIn general, the most common cause of injury was falls (47.9%), followed by road traffic crashes (RTCs, 40.8%). Assault and exposure to inanimate mechanical forces each were only associated with 5.6% of all injuries. The only cause of injury in ages of more than 65 years was fall. The most common cause of injury in ages between 15 and 45 years was RTCs. During the study, two deaths occurred: one was at ICU and the other was at home. The most commonly injured body region was the head (23.8%), followed by the elbow and forearm (19%), hip and thigh (15.9%), and multiple body regions (14.3%). The mean abbreviated injury score was 2.23 ± 1.02; injury severity index was 7.26 ± 7.06; and revised trauma score was 7.84, calculated for 38 patients.

CONCLUSIONPrevention strategy of traumatic injury should focus on falls and RTCs, which are respectively the most common cause of trauma in older aged people and young males.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Female ; Humans ; Iran ; epidemiology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prospective Studies ; Time Factors ; Wounds and Injuries ; epidemiology ; mortality

PURPOSEShoulder dislocation is a common joint dislocation managed by the emergency physicians in the emergency departments. Pre- and post-reduction radiographic examinations have long been the standard practice to confirm the presence of dislocation and the successful reduction. However, shoulder ultrasonography has recently been proposed as an alternative to the radiographic examination. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of ultrasonography in evaluating proper reduction of the dislocated joint.

METHODSThis was a prospective observational study. All patients with confirmed anterior shoulder dislocation were examined by both ultrasonography and radiography after the attempt for reduction of the dislocated joint. The examiners were blinded to the result of the other imaging modality. Results of the two methods were then compared.

RESULTSOverall, 108 patients with confirmed anterior shoulder dislocation were enrolled in the study. Ninety-one (84.3%) of the patients were males. Mean age of the participants was (30.11 ± 11.41) years. The majority of the patients had a recurrent dislocation. Bedside ultrasonography showed a sensitivity of 53.8% (95% CI: 29.1%-76.8%) and a specificity of 100% (95% CI: 96.1%-100%) in detecting inadequate reductions. The results of ultrasonography had a statistically significant agreement with the results of radiography (Kappa = 0.672, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONThe results suggest that the sensitivity of post-reduction ultrasound is not sufficient for it to serve as a substitute for radiography.

Adult ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Point-of-Care Testing ; Prospective Studies ; Shoulder Dislocation ; diagnostic imaging ; surgery ; Ultrasonography