1.Limited Effect of Rebamipide in Addition to Proton Pump Inhibitor (PPI) in the Treatment of Post-Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Gastric Ulcers: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing PPI Plus Rebamipide Combination Therapy with PPI Monotherapy.
Kazuhiko NAKAMURA ; Eikichi IHARA ; Hirotada AKIHO ; Kazuya AKAHOSHI ; Naohiko HARADA ; Toshiaki OCHIAI ; Norimoto NAKAMURA ; Haruei OGINO ; Tsutomu IWASA ; Akira ASO ; Yoichiro IBOSHI ; Ryoichi TAKAYANAGI
Gut and Liver 2016;10(6):917-924
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The ability of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) to resect large early gastric cancers (EGCs) results in the need to treat large artificial gastric ulcers. This study assessed whether the combination therapy of rebamipide plus a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) offered benefits over PPI monotherapy. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, multicenter, open-label, and comparative study, patients who had undergone ESD for EGC or gastric adenoma were randomized into groups receiving either rabeprazole monotherapy (10 mg/day, n=64) or a combination of rabeprazole plus rebamipide (300 mg/day, n=66). The Scar stage (S stage) ratio after treatment was compared, and factors independently associated with ulcer healing were identified by using multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The S stage rates at 4 and 8 weeks were similar in the two groups, even in the subgroups of patients with large amounts of tissue resected and regardless of CYP2C19 genotype. Independent factors for ulcer healing were circumferential location of the tumor and resected tissue size; the type of treatment did not affect ulcer healing. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy with rebamipide and PPI had limited benefits compared with PPI monotherapy in the treatment of post-ESD gastric ulcer (UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000007435).
Adenoma
;
Cicatrix
;
Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19
;
Endoscopy
;
Genotype
;
Humans
;
Multivariate Analysis
;
Prospective Studies
;
Proton Pump Inhibitors
;
Proton Pumps*
;
Protons*
;
Rabeprazole
;
Stomach Neoplasms
;
Stomach Ulcer*
;
Ulcer
2.Limited Effect of Rebamipide in Addition to Proton Pump Inhibitor (PPI) in the Treatment of Post-Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Gastric Ulcers: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing PPI Plus Rebamipide Combination Therapy with PPI Monotherapy.
Kazuhiko NAKAMURA ; Eikichi IHARA ; Hirotada AKIHO ; Kazuya AKAHOSHI ; Naohiko HARADA ; Toshiaki OCHIAI ; Norimoto NAKAMURA ; Haruei OGINO ; Tsutomu IWASA ; Akira ASO ; Yoichiro IBOSHI ; Ryoichi TAKAYANAGI
Gut and Liver 2016;10(6):917-924
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The ability of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) to resect large early gastric cancers (EGCs) results in the need to treat large artificial gastric ulcers. This study assessed whether the combination therapy of rebamipide plus a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) offered benefits over PPI monotherapy. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, multicenter, open-label, and comparative study, patients who had undergone ESD for EGC or gastric adenoma were randomized into groups receiving either rabeprazole monotherapy (10 mg/day, n=64) or a combination of rabeprazole plus rebamipide (300 mg/day, n=66). The Scar stage (S stage) ratio after treatment was compared, and factors independently associated with ulcer healing were identified by using multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The S stage rates at 4 and 8 weeks were similar in the two groups, even in the subgroups of patients with large amounts of tissue resected and regardless of CYP2C19 genotype. Independent factors for ulcer healing were circumferential location of the tumor and resected tissue size; the type of treatment did not affect ulcer healing. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy with rebamipide and PPI had limited benefits compared with PPI monotherapy in the treatment of post-ESD gastric ulcer (UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000007435).
Adenoma
;
Cicatrix
;
Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19
;
Endoscopy
;
Genotype
;
Humans
;
Multivariate Analysis
;
Prospective Studies
;
Proton Pump Inhibitors
;
Proton Pumps*
;
Protons*
;
Rabeprazole
;
Stomach Neoplasms
;
Stomach Ulcer*
;
Ulcer
3.Predictive Factors for Colonic Diverticular Rebleeding: A Retrospective Analysis of the Clinical and Colonoscopic Features of 111 Patients.
Yoshimasa TANAKA ; Yasuaki MOTOMURA ; Kazuya AKAHOSHI ; Risa IWAO ; Keishi KOMORI ; Naotaka NAKAMA ; Takashi OSOEGAWA ; Soichi ITABA ; Masaru KUBOKAWA ; Terumasa HISANO ; Eikichi IHARA ; Kazuhiko NAKAMURA ; Ryoichi TAKAYANAGI
Gut and Liver 2012;6(3):334-338
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Colonic diverticular bleeding can stop spontaneously or be stopped by endoscopic hemostasis. We analyzed the clinical and colonoscopic features of patients with colonic diverticular bleeding to establish the predictive factors for rebleeding. METHODS: A total of 111 patients (median age, 72 years) with colonic diverticular bleeding in Aso Iizuka Hospital between April 2007 and July 2010 were enrolled. Age, sex, body mass index (BMI), comorbidity, medication, location of bleeding, colonoscopic findings and hemostatic methods were analyzed retrospectively from the hospital records. RESULTS: The most common sites of bleeding were the ascending (39.6%) and sigmoid (29.7%) colon. Overt rebleeding occurred in 30 patients (27.0%). Spontaneous hemostasis was seen in 81 patients (73.0%), and endoscopic hemostatic treatment was performed in 30 patients. The BMI in the patients with colonic diverticular rebleeding was significantly higher than in patients without rebleeding. Colonoscopic findings of actively bleeding or nonbleeding visible vessels in the responsible diverticula were more frequent in the group with rebleeding. CONCLUSIONS: A higher BMI and colonoscopic findings of actively bleeding or nonbleeding visible vessels can be used as predictive factors for colonic diverticular rebleeding. Patients with such findings should be carefully followed up after hemostasis of the initial colonic diverticular bleeding.
Body Mass Index
;
Colon
;
Colon, Sigmoid
;
Comorbidity
;
Diverticulum
;
Hemorrhage
;
Hemostasis
;
Hemostasis, Endoscopic
;
Humans
;
Retrospective Studies
4.The Current Strategy for Managing Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors in Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1.
Yusuke NIINA ; Nao FUJIMORI ; Taichi NAKAMURA ; Hisato IGARASHI ; Takamasa OONO ; Kazuhiko NAKAMURA ; Masaki KATO ; Robert T JENSEN ; Tetsuhide ITO ; Ryoichi TAKAYANAGI
Gut and Liver 2012;6(3):287-294
Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is an inherited autosomal dominant disease presenting with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs), parathyroid tumors, or pituitary tumors. Using the PubMed database, we reviewed the literature on information regarding the proper diagnosis and treatment of MEN1-associated pNET. Many cases of MEN1-associated pNET are functioning pNETs. Gastrinomas and insulinomas tend to occur frequently in the duodenum and pancreas, respectively. In addition to diagnostic imaging, the selective arterial secretagogue injection test (SASI test) is useful for localizing functioning pNET. The standard treatment is surgical resection. However, in the case of a functioning pNET, the tumor should first be accurately located using the SASI test before an appropriate surgical method is selected. In cases of a MEN1-associated non-functioning pNET that exceeds 2 cm in diameter, the incidence of distant metastasis is significantly increased, and surgery is recommended. In cases of unresectable pNET, a somatostatin analog has been shown to demonstrate antitumor effects and is considered to be a promising treatment. In addition, molecular-targeted drugs have recently been found to be effective in phase III clinical trials.
Diagnostic Imaging
;
Duodenum
;
Gastrinoma
;
Incidence
;
Insulinoma
;
Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia
;
Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1
;
Neoplasm Metastasis
;
Neuroectodermal Tumors, Primitive
;
Neuroendocrine Tumors
;
Pancreas
;
Pituitary Neoplasms
;
Somatostatin
5.Characteristics of Hemorrhagic Peptic Ulcers in Patients Receiving Antithrombotic/Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drug Therapy.
Kazuhiko NAKAMURA ; Kazuya AKAHOSHI ; Toshiaki OCHIAI ; Keishi KOMORI ; Kazuhiro HARAGUCHI ; Munehiro TANAKA ; Norimoto NAKAMURA ; Yoshimasa TANAKA ; Kana KAKIGAO ; Haruei OGINO ; Eikichi IHARA ; Hirotada AKIHO ; Yasuaki MOTOMURA ; Teppei KABEMURA ; Naohiko HARADA ; Yoshiharu CHIJIIWA ; Tetsuhide ITO ; Ryoichi TAKAYANAGI
Gut and Liver 2012;6(4):423-426
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Antithrombotic/nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) therapies increase the incidence of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. The features of hemorrhagic peptic ulcer disease in patients receiving antithrombotic/NSAID therapies were investigated. METHODS: We investigated the medical records of 485 consecutive patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy and were diagnosed with hemorrhagic gastroduodenal ulcers. The patients treated with antithrombotic agents/NSAIDs were categorized as the antithrombotic therapy (AT) group (n=213). The patients who were not treated with antithrombotics/NSAIDs were categorized as the control (C) group (n=263). The clinical characteristics were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The patients in the AT group were significantly older than those in the C group (p<0.0001). The hemoglobin levels before/without transfusion were significantly lower in the AT group (8.24+/-2.41 g/dL) than in the C group (9.44+/-2.95 g/dL) (p<0.0001). After adjusting for age, the difference in the hemoglobin levels between the two groups remained significant (p=0.0334). The transfusion rates were significantly higher in the AT group than in the C group (p=0.0002). However, the outcome of endoscopic hemostasis was similar in the AT and C groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with hemorrhagic peptic ulcers receiving antithrombotic/NSAID therapies were exposed to a greater risk of severe bleeding that required transfusion but were still treatable by endoscopy.
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal
;
Endoscopy
;
Endoscopy, Digestive System
;
Hemoglobins
;
Hemorrhage
;
Hemostasis, Endoscopic
;
Humans
;
Incidence
;
Medical Records
;
Peptic Ulcer