Methods: Among 399 patients who underwent ASD surgery, 62 (≥5 levels fused, >2-year follow-up) underwent fusion from T9–10 to L5 (group L, n=21) or to S2–alar–iliac (group S, n=41). Spinal alignments, Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 scores, performance of activities (clipping toenail, wiping buttock, and wearing socks), proximal and distal junctional failure (PJF+DJF), rod fractures (RFs), and overall revision rates (RRs) were compared between the groups. Results: Group L included younger patients and had longer follow-ups when compared with group S. Although the preoperative pelvic incidence and SRS sagittal modifiers were better in group L, postoperative spinal restorations were nonpathological in both groups. Both groups showed similar deformity progression at the 2-year follow-up; however, group L had lower SRS-22 pain scores. Although “wiping buttocks” did not differ between the groups, the performance of “clipping toenails” and “wearing socks” was poorer in group S at 2 years (possible, group S; 40% vs. group L; 85%–90%). The RRs did not differ between the groups; however, the PJF+DJF rate was higher in group L. DJF was not observed in group S, but occurrence of RFs was noted. Conclusions Although poorer SRS-22 pain scores might be related to lumbosacral mobility, sufficient restoration, equivalent deformity progression, and similar RRs with better activity imply that lumbosacral preservation should be considered in younger patients with moderate deformities.

Methods: Among 399 patients who underwent ASD surgery, 62 (≥5 levels fused, >2-year follow-up) underwent fusion from T9–10 to L5 (group L, n=21) or to S2–alar–iliac (group S, n=41). Spinal alignments, Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 scores, performance of activities (clipping toenail, wiping buttock, and wearing socks), proximal and distal junctional failure (PJF+DJF), rod fractures (RFs), and overall revision rates (RRs) were compared between the groups. Results: Group L included younger patients and had longer follow-ups when compared with group S. Although the preoperative pelvic incidence and SRS sagittal modifiers were better in group L, postoperative spinal restorations were nonpathological in both groups. Both groups showed similar deformity progression at the 2-year follow-up; however, group L had lower SRS-22 pain scores. Although “wiping buttocks” did not differ between the groups, the performance of “clipping toenails” and “wearing socks” was poorer in group S at 2 years (possible, group S; 40% vs. group L; 85%–90%). The RRs did not differ between the groups; however, the PJF+DJF rate was higher in group L. DJF was not observed in group S, but occurrence of RFs was noted. Conclusions Although poorer SRS-22 pain scores might be related to lumbosacral mobility, sufficient restoration, equivalent deformity progression, and similar RRs with better activity imply that lumbosacral preservation should be considered in younger patients with moderate deformities.

Methods: Among 399 patients who underwent ASD surgery, 62 (≥5 levels fused, >2-year follow-up) underwent fusion from T9–10 to L5 (group L, n=21) or to S2–alar–iliac (group S, n=41). Spinal alignments, Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 scores, performance of activities (clipping toenail, wiping buttock, and wearing socks), proximal and distal junctional failure (PJF+DJF), rod fractures (RFs), and overall revision rates (RRs) were compared between the groups. Results: Group L included younger patients and had longer follow-ups when compared with group S. Although the preoperative pelvic incidence and SRS sagittal modifiers were better in group L, postoperative spinal restorations were nonpathological in both groups. Both groups showed similar deformity progression at the 2-year follow-up; however, group L had lower SRS-22 pain scores. Although “wiping buttocks” did not differ between the groups, the performance of “clipping toenails” and “wearing socks” was poorer in group S at 2 years (possible, group S; 40% vs. group L; 85%–90%). The RRs did not differ between the groups; however, the PJF+DJF rate was higher in group L. DJF was not observed in group S, but occurrence of RFs was noted. Conclusions Although poorer SRS-22 pain scores might be related to lumbosacral mobility, sufficient restoration, equivalent deformity progression, and similar RRs with better activity imply that lumbosacral preservation should be considered in younger patients with moderate deformities.

Methods: Among 399 patients who underwent ASD surgery, 62 (≥5 levels fused, >2-year follow-up) underwent fusion from T9–10 to L5 (group L, n=21) or to S2–alar–iliac (group S, n=41). Spinal alignments, Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 scores, performance of activities (clipping toenail, wiping buttock, and wearing socks), proximal and distal junctional failure (PJF+DJF), rod fractures (RFs), and overall revision rates (RRs) were compared between the groups. Results: Group L included younger patients and had longer follow-ups when compared with group S. Although the preoperative pelvic incidence and SRS sagittal modifiers were better in group L, postoperative spinal restorations were nonpathological in both groups. Both groups showed similar deformity progression at the 2-year follow-up; however, group L had lower SRS-22 pain scores. Although “wiping buttocks” did not differ between the groups, the performance of “clipping toenails” and “wearing socks” was poorer in group S at 2 years (possible, group S; 40% vs. group L; 85%–90%). The RRs did not differ between the groups; however, the PJF+DJF rate was higher in group L. DJF was not observed in group S, but occurrence of RFs was noted. Conclusions Although poorer SRS-22 pain scores might be related to lumbosacral mobility, sufficient restoration, equivalent deformity progression, and similar RRs with better activity imply that lumbosacral preservation should be considered in younger patients with moderate deformities.

Background: This study analyzed data from the Long-term care Information system For Evidence (LIFE) database to examine the effects of motivation to eat, appetite and food satisfaction, and food consciousness on food intake and weight loss. Methods: Of the 748 nursing home residents enrolled in the LIFE database, 336 met the eligibility criteria for this cross-sectional study. Motivation to eat, appetite and food satisfaction, and food consciousness were rated on five-point Likert scales (e.g., good, fair, normal, not so good, and not good). We applied Spearman rank correlation coefficient and multiple regression analyses to analyze the relationships between these three items, daily energy and protein intake, and body weight loss over 6 months. Results: The mean participant age was 87.4±8.1 years and 259 (77%) were female. The required levels of care included—level 1, 1 (0%); level 2, 4 (1%); level 3, 107 (32%); level 4, 135 (40%); and level 5, 89 (27%). The mean daily energy intake was 28.2±7.8 kcal/kg. The mean daily protein intake was 1.1±0.3 g/kg. The mean weight loss over six months was 1.2±0.7 kg. We observed strong positive correlations among motivation to eat, appetite and food satisfaction, and food consciousness (r>0.8). These three items were significantly associated with higher daily energy intake but not with daily protein intake. Only appetite and food satisfaction were significantly associated with lower weight loss over six months. Conclusion The observed associations of appetite and food satisfaction suggest that these factors may be more important to assess than motivation to eat or food consciousness among older adult residents of long-term care facilities.

Background: This study analyzed data from the Long-term care Information system For Evidence (LIFE) database to examine the effects of motivation to eat, appetite and food satisfaction, and food consciousness on food intake and weight loss. Methods: Of the 748 nursing home residents enrolled in the LIFE database, 336 met the eligibility criteria for this cross-sectional study. Motivation to eat, appetite and food satisfaction, and food consciousness were rated on five-point Likert scales (e.g., good, fair, normal, not so good, and not good). We applied Spearman rank correlation coefficient and multiple regression analyses to analyze the relationships between these three items, daily energy and protein intake, and body weight loss over 6 months. Results: The mean participant age was 87.4±8.1 years and 259 (77%) were female. The required levels of care included—level 1, 1 (0%); level 2, 4 (1%); level 3, 107 (32%); level 4, 135 (40%); and level 5, 89 (27%). The mean daily energy intake was 28.2±7.8 kcal/kg. The mean daily protein intake was 1.1±0.3 g/kg. The mean weight loss over six months was 1.2±0.7 kg. We observed strong positive correlations among motivation to eat, appetite and food satisfaction, and food consciousness (r>0.8). These three items were significantly associated with higher daily energy intake but not with daily protein intake. Only appetite and food satisfaction were significantly associated with lower weight loss over six months. Conclusion The observed associations of appetite and food satisfaction suggest that these factors may be more important to assess than motivation to eat or food consciousness among older adult residents of long-term care facilities.

Background: This study analyzed data from the Long-term care Information system For Evidence (LIFE) database to examine the effects of motivation to eat, appetite and food satisfaction, and food consciousness on food intake and weight loss. Methods: Of the 748 nursing home residents enrolled in the LIFE database, 336 met the eligibility criteria for this cross-sectional study. Motivation to eat, appetite and food satisfaction, and food consciousness were rated on five-point Likert scales (e.g., good, fair, normal, not so good, and not good). We applied Spearman rank correlation coefficient and multiple regression analyses to analyze the relationships between these three items, daily energy and protein intake, and body weight loss over 6 months. Results: The mean participant age was 87.4±8.1 years and 259 (77%) were female. The required levels of care included—level 1, 1 (0%); level 2, 4 (1%); level 3, 107 (32%); level 4, 135 (40%); and level 5, 89 (27%). The mean daily energy intake was 28.2±7.8 kcal/kg. The mean daily protein intake was 1.1±0.3 g/kg. The mean weight loss over six months was 1.2±0.7 kg. We observed strong positive correlations among motivation to eat, appetite and food satisfaction, and food consciousness (r>0.8). These three items were significantly associated with higher daily energy intake but not with daily protein intake. Only appetite and food satisfaction were significantly associated with lower weight loss over six months. Conclusion The observed associations of appetite and food satisfaction suggest that these factors may be more important to assess than motivation to eat or food consciousness among older adult residents of long-term care facilities.

Background: This study analyzed data from the Long-term care Information system For Evidence (LIFE) database to examine the effects of motivation to eat, appetite and food satisfaction, and food consciousness on food intake and weight loss. Methods: Of the 748 nursing home residents enrolled in the LIFE database, 336 met the eligibility criteria for this cross-sectional study. Motivation to eat, appetite and food satisfaction, and food consciousness were rated on five-point Likert scales (e.g., good, fair, normal, not so good, and not good). We applied Spearman rank correlation coefficient and multiple regression analyses to analyze the relationships between these three items, daily energy and protein intake, and body weight loss over 6 months. Results: The mean participant age was 87.4±8.1 years and 259 (77%) were female. The required levels of care included—level 1, 1 (0%); level 2, 4 (1%); level 3, 107 (32%); level 4, 135 (40%); and level 5, 89 (27%). The mean daily energy intake was 28.2±7.8 kcal/kg. The mean daily protein intake was 1.1±0.3 g/kg. The mean weight loss over six months was 1.2±0.7 kg. We observed strong positive correlations among motivation to eat, appetite and food satisfaction, and food consciousness (r>0.8). These three items were significantly associated with higher daily energy intake but not with daily protein intake. Only appetite and food satisfaction were significantly associated with lower weight loss over six months. Conclusion The observed associations of appetite and food satisfaction suggest that these factors may be more important to assess than motivation to eat or food consciousness among older adult residents of long-term care facilities.

Objectives: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) complicated by secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) is associated with an increased risk of fragility fractures. Etelcalcetide (EC) is a treatment for SHPT that reduces serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels. However, the effects of combined treatment with osteoporosis drugs such as teriparatide (TPTD) remain unclear. This study investigates the combined effects of EC and TPTD on bone in CKD model rats. Methods: The CKD model was established in 8-week-old male Wistar rats by feeding them a 0.75% adenine diet for 4 weeks. At 20 weeks of age, the rats were divided into 4 groups (n = 9–10 in each group): CKD group (vehicle administration), TPTD group (30 μg/kg, 3 times/week), EC group (0.6 mg/kg, daily), and Comb group (TPTD and EC combined). EC was injected for 12 weeks starting at 20 weeks of age, and TPTD was injected for 8 weeks starting at 24 weeks of age. After treatment, the followings were evaluated: bone mineral density, bone strength, biochemical tests, bone and fat histomorphometry, and micro-computed tomography. Results: In CKD model rats, the combination of EC and TPTD was more effective in increasing cortical bone thickness and bone strength and inhibiting porosity. In addition, the combined treatment decreased bone marrow adiposity and fibrosis, and it increased bone mass and improved bone microstructure in trabecular bone. Conclusions With the observed benefits such as improved bone mass, bone strength, structural properties, and bone marrow adiposity, combination therapy may be a potential way to improve bone fragility in CKD.