OBJECTIVE: To provide an overview on the impact of healthcare disruption by the COVID-19 pandemic to urology training programs in the Philippines. METHODS: A survey questionnaire was used in collaboration with the study done by Rosen, et al. last May 2020. Telephone survey of the study population was done determining the status of resident staffing, workload, health/wellness, and didactics. Numerical and categorical data were analyzed and descriptive statistics are provided. RESULTS: All the observations on resident time in the workplace, including assignment to teams (81%), redeployment responses (55-97%), and remote clinical work (65%) were significant. Fifty one percent of residents have decreased research load. Eighty one percent have didactics in small groups. Fifty-five percent have 1 to 2 Video-based learning/conferences per week (p=0.007) followed by those with 3-4 with 98% (p=0.120) and those with >5 with only 6% (p=0.729). For Resident health and wellness, 87% of the residents were exposed to COVID-positive patients, but only 8% of residents were COVID positive (p=0.591). Lastly, 59% of the participants do not have access to wellness programs. CONCLUSION Data from respondents revealed significant changes in the different aspects of the present study. Urology residents spent more time away from their specialties, and have been re-deployed to COVID-19 floors. Ambulatory services, conferences, educational lectures have mostly shifted to virtual platforms. Resident concerns for COVID-19 exposure have been addressed properly; however, wellness programs have not been widely available for residents. As a first national survey, the present study may give significant insights on program changes and may be used as preliminary data for future studies.
Philippines

Objective: The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends prone positioning for mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) to improve oxygenation. Subsequently, researchers facilitated the position to non-intubated COVID-19 patients as early management which showed significant improvement but with discerned limitations. Tripod position is explored as an alternative exhibiting promising results. This present study describes a case series of four COVID-19 patients with moderate to severe ARDS who demonstrated considerable breakthrough. Methods: Four COVID-19 cases of moderate to severe ARDS were instructed to do tripod positioning as long as they can tolerate while under close supervision. Results: An hour after assuming tripod position, all four patients presented a decrease in respiratory rate, increase in peripheral oxygen saturation, and increase in partial oxygen saturation in arterial blood gas. The assumed position was maintained by four patients without discomfort and was maintained with a mean of 12 - 20 hours per day. Conclusions Our findings confirmed that tripod position is advantageous to non-intubated COVID-19 patients with moderate to severe ARDS and may delay or prevent invasive mechanical ventilation. The position also manifested tolerance to extended duration which permitted time for the medical team to focus on managing their disease in its entirety. Nevertheless, certain aspects such as contraindication, side effects, and other adverse events that may occur have yet to be sufficiently clarified and investigated.
Prone Position ; Respiratory Distress Syndrome ; COVID-19