Objective:To search and summarize the best evidence for blood pressure management in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage to provide evidence for blood pressure management in these patients.Methods:PIPOST model was used to establish evidence-based questions; with "intracerebral hemorrhage/cerebral hemorrhage/ICH/HICH/stroke" AND "blood pressure/hypertension" as English search terms, and with "脑出血/颅内出血/脑卒中"+"血压" as Chinese search terms, the official websites of related associations and domestic and foreign databases, such as GUIDE.com, UpToDate, Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP Chinese journal Service platform, and Wanfang Data Knowledge Service platform, were searched. Two researchers independently evaluated the quality of the literature, including guidelines, systematic reviews, and expert consensus, and extracted the evidence.Results:A total of 17 articles were selected; 2 were clinical decision type, 7 were guideline type, 7 were systematic review type, and 1 was expert consensus type. Twenty-six pieces of evidence were summarized into 5 aspects: timing and methods of lowering blood pressure, benefits and risks of lowering blood pressure, drug selection and selection methods, recurrence prevention of stroke, and matters for attention.Conclusion:It is necessary to pay attention to blood pressure management in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage; in the process of evidence application, it's suggested to make an appropriate blood pressure management plan for the patients according to clinical situation.

Objective:To develop a professional grief scale for medical postgraduate students(PGS-MPS) and test its reliability and validity.Methods:Based on the integrated model of professional grief, the initial item pool was formed after literature analysis, semi-structured interviews, group discussion, and 5 experts were invited to assess the relevance of the items and provided revision suggestion.A total of 506 valid questionnaires were collected.SPSS 25.0 and AMOS 26.0 were used to test its reliability and validity.Results:The PGS-MPS included 41 items, including the professional grief reaction subscale and disenfranchised grief subscale.The professional grief reaction subscale included emotional reaction (14 items), physiological and cognitive reaction (20 items), and the cumulative variance contribution rate of the two factors model was 52.908%.Disenfranchised grief subscale included 7 items, with a single dimension and a variance contribution rate of 51.730%.Confirmatory factor analysis indicated the model fitting well.The Cronbach’s α coefficients for the professional grief reaction subscale and disenfranchised grief subscale were 0.947 and 0.850, respectively.Conclusion:The PGS-MPS has good reliability and validity and can be used to evaluate professional grief of medical postgraduate students.