In recent years, it has become increasingly apparent that noncoding RNAs (ncRNA) are of crucial importance for human cancer. The functional relevance of ncRNAs is particularly evident for microRNAs (miRNAs) and long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs). miRNAs are endogenously expressed small RNA sequences that act as post-transcriptional regulators of gene expression and have been extensively studied for their roles in cancers, whereas lncRNAs are emerging as important players in the cancer paradigm in recent years. These noncoding genes are often aberrantly expressed in a variety of human cancers. However, the biological functions of most ncRNAs remain largely unknown. Recently, evidence has begun to accumulate describing how ncRNAs are dysregulated in cancer and cancer stem cells, a subset of cancer cells harboring self-renewal and differentiation capacities. These studies provide insight into the functional roles that ncRNAs play in tumor initiation, progression, and resistance to therapies, and they suggest ncRNAs as attractive therapeutic targets and potentially useful diagnostic tools.
Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic ; Humans ; MicroRNAs ; genetics ; metabolism ; Neoplasms ; genetics ; metabolism ; pathology ; therapy ; Neoplastic Stem Cells ; metabolism ; RNA, Long Noncoding ; genetics ; metabolism ; RNA, Untranslated ; genetics ; metabolism

Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-mediated therapy has been shown to be clinically effective in regenerating tissue defects. For improved regenerative therapy, it is critical to isolate homogenous populations of MSCs with high capacity to differentiate into appropriate tissues. The utilization of stem cell surface antigens provides a means to identify MSCs from various tissues. However, few surface markers that consistently isolate highly regenerative MSCs have been validated, making it challenging for routine clinical applications and making it all the more imperative to identify reliable surface markers. In this study, we used three surface marker combinations: CD51/CD140α, CD271, and STRO-1/CD146 for the isolation of homogenous populations of dental mesenchymal stem cells (DMSCs) from heterogeneous periodontal ligament cells (PDLCs). Fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis revealed that 24% of PDLCs were CD51(+)/CD140α(+), 0.8% were CD271(+), and 2.4% were STRO-1(+)/CD146(+). Sorted cell populations were further assessed for their multipotent properties by inducing osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation. All three subsets of isolated DMSCs exhibited differentiation capacity into osteogenic and chondrogenic lineages but with varying degrees. CD271(+) DMSCs demonstrated the greatest osteogenic potential with strong induction of osteogenic markers such as DLX5, RUNX2, and BGLAP. Our study provides evidence that surface marker combinations used in this study are sufficient markers for the isolation of DMSCs from PDLCs. These results provide important insight into using specific surface markers for identifying homogenous populations of DMSCs for their improved utilization in regenerative medicine.
Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing ; analysis ; Adult ; Aggrecans ; analysis ; Antigens, CD ; analysis ; Antigens, Surface ; analysis ; CD146 Antigen ; analysis ; Cell Differentiation ; physiology ; Cell Lineage ; Cell Separation ; methods ; Cells, Cultured ; Chondrogenesis ; physiology ; Collagen Type II ; analysis ; Core Binding Factor Alpha 1 Subunit ; analysis ; Flow Cytometry ; methods ; Homeodomain Proteins ; analysis ; Humans ; Integrin alphaV ; analysis ; Mesenchymal Stromal Cells ; cytology ; physiology ; Multipotent Stem Cells ; cytology ; physiology ; Nerve Tissue Proteins ; analysis ; Osteogenesis ; physiology ; Periodontal Ligament ; cytology ; Receptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor alpha ; analysis ; Receptors, Nerve Growth Factor ; analysis ; SOX9 Transcription Factor ; analysis ; Time Factors ; Transcription Factors ; analysis

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are a promising tool in regenerative medicine due to their capacity to differentiate into multiple lineages. In addition to MSCs isolated from bone marrow (BMSCs), adult MSCs are isolated from craniofacial tissues including dental pulp tissues (DPs) using various stem cell surface markers. However, there has been a lack of consensus on a set of surface makers that are reproducibly effective at isolating putative multipotent dental mesenchymal stem cells (DMSCs). In this study, we used different combinations of surface markers (CD51/CD140α, CD271, and STRO-1/CD146) to isolate homogeneous populations of DMSCs from heterogeneous dental pulp cells (DPCs) obtained from DP and compared their capacity to undergo multilineage differentiation. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting revealed that 27.3% of DPCs were CD51(+)/CD140α(+), 10.6% were CD271(+), and 0.3% were STRO-1(+)/CD146(+). Under odontogenic conditions, all three subsets of isolated DMSCs exhibited differentiation capacity into odontogenic lineages. Among these isolated subsets of DMSCs, CD271(+) DMSCs demonstrated the greatest odontogenic potential. While all three combinations of surface markers in this study successfully isolated DMSCs from DPCs, the single CD271 marker presents the most effective stem cell surface marker for identification of DMSCs with high odontogenic potential. Isolated CD271(+) DMSCs could potentially be utilized for future clinical applications in dentistry and regenerative medicine.
Adult ; Adult Stem Cells ; cytology ; Antigens, CD ; analysis ; Antigens, Surface ; analysis ; Biomarkers ; analysis ; CD146 Antigen ; analysis ; Cell Culture Techniques ; Cell Differentiation ; physiology ; Cell Lineage ; Cell Separation ; methods ; Cells, Cultured ; Chondrogenesis ; physiology ; Dental Pulp ; cytology ; Flow Cytometry ; methods ; Humans ; Integrin alphaV ; analysis ; Mesenchymal Stromal Cells ; cytology ; Multipotent Stem Cells ; cytology ; Nerve Tissue Proteins ; analysis ; Odontogenesis ; physiology ; Receptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor alpha ; analysis ; Receptors, Nerve Growth Factor ; analysis

In the original version of this Article, Figure 1c was inadvertently assembled with a duplicate of Figure 1b. The correct image for Figure 1c, shown below, has been added in the HTML and PDF versions of the Article. This does not affect the conclusions of the study. We sincerely apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused our readers.