1.Relationship between life satisfaction of family caregivers and degree of disability of disabled elderly people in Xinjiang
Keru LIU ; Yali WU ; Yuhuan WANG ; Mengmeng ZHANG ; Shuhua ZHAO ; Xueting TANG ; Ruoxian WANG
Chinese Mental Health Journal 2024;38(2):144-150
Objective:To explore the relationship between the life satisfaction of family caregivers and the de-gree of disability of disabled elderly people in Xinjiang Uygur and Kazak nationality,and the role of family mem-bers'participation in the relationship.Methods:A total of 431 elderly people with disabilities at home and their fam-ily caregivers(247 without family members and 184 with family members)were selected from Xinjiang Uygur and Kazak ethnic groups,and the survey was conducted with the Activity of Daily Living Scale(ADL)and Life Satis-faction Index B(LSIB).Results:The LSIB scores in family caregivers were negatively correlated with the ADL scores in the disabled elderly(r=-0.19,P<0.01),and the family members'participation in care was positively correlated with the LSIB scores of family caregivers(r=0.52,P<0.01).Family members'participation in care could moderate the negative effect of the ADL scores in the disabled elderly on the LSIB scores in family caregivers(β=0.08,P<0.05).Conclusion:The involvement of family members in care has a moderating effect on the life satisfaction of Uyghur and Kazak family caregivers and the degree of disability of disabled elderly people.
2.Risk factors related to the spinal anatomy of lumbar spondylolysis: a review
Fuxin WANG ; Kang HAN ; Zhaohu MAO ; Zheng ZHANG ; Ruoxian SONG
Chinese Journal of Trauma 2024;40(3):284-288
Lumbar spondylolysis refers to the bone injury between the upper and lower articular processes and the transition zone of the transverse process of the unilateral or bilateral pedicle of the lumbar spine, being a common cause of low back pain in patients that seriously affects their quality of life. The mechanism of the occurrence and development of lumbar spondylolysis is complex, and long-term stress wear and sudden damage with an external force are the main causes. At the same time, risk factors related to spinal anatomy are important causes of lumbar spondylolysis. A full understanding of the pathogenesis of lumbar spondylolysis, early identification of high-risk groups, and active preventive measures can reduce its incidence. For this purpose, the authors reviewed the research progress in risk factors related to the spinal anatomy of lumbar spondylolysis from three aspects including genetical susceptibility, local anatomy and overall spine-pelvic sequence, so as to provide references for the prevention and treatment of spondylolysis.
3.The pedicle isthmus angle: a new imaging parameter for lumbar spondylolysis in young male patients
Fuxin WANG ; Kun WANG ; Zheng ZHANG ; Zhaohu MAO ; Ruoxian SONG
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics 2024;44(18):1207-1214
Objective:To introduce a novel risk factor for lumbar spondylolysis, the pedicle isthmus angle (PIA), and to explore its underlying mechanism and clinical relevance.Methods:A retrospective analysis of CT imaging data from young male patients with lumbar spondylolysis, admitted to the 960th Hospital of the Joint Logistic Support Force of the PLA between January 2018 and August 2023, was conducted. The study included 119 cases of unilateral spondylolysis and 339 cases of bilateral spondylolysis, with a mean age of 22.8±3.4 years (range 18-30 years). A control group of 458 patients with normal lumbar CT scans, presenting with low back pain, was also analyzed. Their mean age was 22.9±3.5 years (range 18-30 years). The PIA of the left and right sides of the L 3, L 4, and L 5 vertebrae in both the spondylolysis and control groups were measured using CT imaging. Differences in PIA measurements between the left and right sides, as well as between groups, were compared. Binary logistic regression analysis identified risk factors for lumbar spondylolysis. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and Youden index were used to determine the critical risk threshold for lumbar spondylolysis. Results:No significant differences were found between the spondylolysis and control groups in terms of gender, age, height, weight, or body mass index (BMI) ( P>0.05). Similarly, there was no significant difference in the left and right PIA measurements for the L 3, L 4, and L 5 vertebrae in either group ( P>0.05). The PIA of the L 3 and L 4 vertebrae was not significantly different between the groups (107.2°±3.5° vs. 107.1°±3.5°, t=0.270, P=0.787; 110.6°±3.5° vs. 110.5°±4.0°, t=0.441, P=0.659). However, the PIA of the L 5 vertebra was significantly larger in the spondylolysis group (117.7°±4.7°) compared to the control group (114.0°±4.9°) ( t=11.654, P<0.001). Logistic regression analysis identified an increased PIA at L 5 ( β=0.159, OR=1.172, P<0.001) as a risk factor for lumbar spondylolysis. According to the ROC curve and Youden index, the risk of lumbar spondylolysis increased substantially when the L 5 PIA exceeded 115.8°. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.709, with a sensitivity of 0.670 and a specificity of 0.644. Conclusion:PIA is an objective and effective imaging parameter for predicting lumbar spondylolysis. It aids in understanding the pathophysiology of spondylolysis, identifying high-risk individuals, and informing prevention and treatment strategies for lumbar spondylolysis.