Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle biopsy (EBUS-TBNA) in intrathoracic tuberculosis(TB).Methods We retrospectively analyzed patients underwent EBUS-TBNA with a final diagnosis of intrathoracic TB at Shanghai Chest Hospital from October 2009 to March 2013 and observed that the diagnostic efficacy by pathology and microbiology and safety of EBUS-TBNA for intrathoracic TB.Results 75 patients were diagnosed with pulmonary TB or intrathoracic tuberculous lymphadenitis,and accuracy was 80％ (60/75) by EBUS TBNA.A total of 60 patients had pathology,acid-fast bacilli(AFB) staining and mycobacterial culture test results,of whom 52 (86.67％)were diagnosed.Pathological findings were consistent with TB in 77.33％ patients (58/75),in 20.31％ (13/64) the smear were positive for AFB and in 46.67％ (28/60) were positive for cuhure.One hundred and twenty-nine mediastinal or hilar lymph nodes and 10 intrapulmonary lesions were biopsied in 75 patients,the average target number of per patient were 1.85.Pathological findings were consistent with TB in 66.19％ samples(92/139),in 13.91％ (16/115) were positive for AFB and in 38.32％ (41/107) were positive for culture.Multivariate regression revealed that short-axis diameter was an independent risk factor associated with positive pathology,smear and euhure.Additionally,more aspiration times cause higher pathology positive rate,pathology showing necrosis and positive smear were independent risk factors associated with positive cuhure.There were two patients occurred complications during operation.Conclusion EBUS-TBNA was a safe and effective method for the diagnosis of intrathoracic tuberculosis.

Background and objective Endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has been widely applied in diagnosing mediastinal and hilar adenopathy. hTis study is further to evaluate value and safety of EBUS-TBNA in diagnosing intrathoracic metastasis from extrapulmonary malignancy. Methods Prospectively analysis of 41 patients suspected intrathoracic metastasis from previous diagnosed/concurrent extrapulmonary malignancies in Shanghai Chest Hospital, with radiologic ifndings showing mediastinal/hilar lymph node enlargement or intrapulmonary lesion requiring EBUS-TBNA examination for pathological diagnosis. Results 41 candidate patients enrolled, and 67 mediastinal/hilar lymph nodes and 5 intrapulmonary lesions were aspirated. 14 intrathoracic metastasis, 10 primary lung cancer, 9 reactive lymphadenitis, 4 sarcoid-like reactions, and 1 tuberculosis was diagnosed by EBUS-TBNA. Sensitivity and accuracy of EBUS-TBNA in diagnosing intra-thoracic metastasis was 87.50%and 95.12%, respectively. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed in 18 malignant tumors to obtain deifnite type or origin, twelve intrathoracic metastasis and 6 primary lung cancer were further conifrmed. Conclusion EBUS-TBNA is a safe, effective method for the diagnosis of intrathoracic metastasis from extrapulmonary malignancy. IHC can provide additional evidence for distinguishing extrapulmonary malignancy from primary lung cancer.

Objective To assess the filtration efficiency of two N95 filtering-facepiece respirators(FFRs)for the decomposition products of sulfur hexafluoride (SF6).Methods Two types of N95 FFRs (the particulate and the acid-proof respirators) were selected in this study.The decomposition products of SF6,including particles,hydrogen fluoride (HF) and sulfur dioxide (SO2),were measured under experimental condition by using TSI PortaCount Plus,fluorine ion-selective electrodes and spectrophotometer separately.The filtration efficiency was then calculated and compared.Results Both two models of N95 respirators had lowest filtration efficiency larger than 95％ for particles under airflow ranged from 10 to 95 L/min.When exposed to different concentrations of HF (low:0.00～ 1.99 mg/m3,middle:2.00～3.99 mg/m3,high:＞4 mg/m3),the acid-proof N95respirator was more effective than the particulate respirator (P＜0.05) with a filtration efficiency of 98.83％,99.08％,and 99.03％ versus 48.44％,45.71％,and 47.31％.For four SO2 concentration ranges (0.00～2.49 mg/m3,2.50～4.99 mg/m3,5.00-9.99 mg/m3,and ＞10.00 mg/m3),the acid-proof respirator showed a high filtration efficiency within exposure to 1.5 hours:95.73％,98.67％,98.14％,and 97.78％,respectively,when exposure duration extended to 4 hours,the filtration efficiency of the acid-proof respirator decreased to 91.97％,82.28％,70.12％,and 58.56％,respectively.Conclusion Both the particulate and the acid-proof N95 FFRs met national standards on the particulate filtration efficiency.The acid-proof N95 respirator demonstrates to be more effective in filtering HF and SO2 than the particulate respirator.The filtration efficiency could decrease to an unsafe condition under longer exposure duration,timely replacement of respirator is recommended at the workplace.

Objective To assess the filtration efficiency of two N95 filtering-facepiece respirators(FFRs)for the decomposition products of sulfur hexafluoride (SF6).Methods Two types of N95 FFRs (the particulate and the acid-proof respirators) were selected in this study.The decomposition products of SF6,including particles,hydrogen fluoride (HF) and sulfur dioxide (SO2),were measured under experimental condition by using TSI PortaCount Plus,fluorine ion-selective electrodes and spectrophotometer separately.The filtration efficiency was then calculated and compared.Results Both two models of N95 respirators had lowest filtration efficiency larger than 95％ for particles under airflow ranged from 10 to 95 L/min.When exposed to different concentrations of HF (low:0.00～ 1.99 mg/m3,middle:2.00～3.99 mg/m3,high:＞4 mg/m3),the acid-proof N95respirator was more effective than the particulate respirator (P＜0.05) with a filtration efficiency of 98.83％,99.08％,and 99.03％ versus 48.44％,45.71％,and 47.31％.For four SO2 concentration ranges (0.00～2.49 mg/m3,2.50～4.99 mg/m3,5.00-9.99 mg/m3,and ＞10.00 mg/m3),the acid-proof respirator showed a high filtration efficiency within exposure to 1.5 hours:95.73％,98.67％,98.14％,and 97.78％,respectively,when exposure duration extended to 4 hours,the filtration efficiency of the acid-proof respirator decreased to 91.97％,82.28％,70.12％,and 58.56％,respectively.Conclusion Both the particulate and the acid-proof N95 FFRs met national standards on the particulate filtration efficiency.The acid-proof N95 respirator demonstrates to be more effective in filtering HF and SO2 than the particulate respirator.The filtration efficiency could decrease to an unsafe condition under longer exposure duration,timely replacement of respirator is recommended at the workplace.

OBJECTIVETo compare the determination methods of fiber number concentration between China and WHO.

METHODSIndividual fiber samplings were conducted at a RCF manufacturing enterprise for 40 types of work. Flow rate was set as 2 L/min and lasted 2 to 4 hours. We used acetone-triacetin to prepare samples. The rules of two methods were used to count fibers for each sample respectively. The differences between the results of two methods were compared using the sign-rank test, and the correlation between the two methods' counting results were evaluated by the Spearsman rank correlation analysis.

RESULTSThe results of WHO counting rule were higher than those of Chinese counting rule for the same sample. The ratios of WHO method to Chinese method ranged from 1.88 to 3.70. Paired sign-rank test found the statistically significant differences of the results between the two methods (P<0.01). The rank correlation coefficient of the results by two rules counting ranged between 0.621 to 0.975, suggested positive correlation (P<0.01). The possible reasons of the difference between the two methods included the difference between the shapes of asbestos fiber and man-made mineral fiber, and counting rules of two methods.

CONCLUSIONThe results of WHO counting method is higher than those of Chinese counting method. High correlations between the results of the two methods were observed.

Asbestos ; analysis ; Chemistry Techniques, Analytical ; methods ; China ; Humans ; Mineral Fibers ; analysis ; Specimen Handling ; World Health Organization