Objective: There is controversy among different guidelines regarding the use of thermal ablation to treat clinical T1a renal cell carcinomas with tumor sizes ranging from 3.1–4 cm. Therefore, we compared oncological outcomes between heat-based thermal ablation (hTA) and cryoablation (CA) in patients with solid T1a renal cell carcinomas, including those with a tumor size ≤3 cm and a tumor size of 3.1–4 cm. Materials and Methods: Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2000–2019), we identified patients with clinical T1a renal cell carcinomas that were histologically confirmed and treated with hTA or CA. After propensity score matching using a 1:1 ratio, the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were estimated and compared between the two methods. Cancer-specific mortality (CSM) was also analyzed, considering other-cause mortality as a competing risk. Results: Of the 3513 assessable patients, 1426 (40.6%) and 2087 (59.4%) were treated with hTA and CA, respectively. After propensity score matching, the hTA and CA groups included 1393 and 1393 patients, respectively. hTA was associated with shorter OS than CA with a hazard ratio of 1.17 (95% confidence interval, 1.04–1.32; P = 0.010). The hTA and CA groups did not reveal statistically significant differences in CSS with a hazard ratio of 1.07 (95% confidence interval, 0.76–1.50; P = 0.706). The hTA and CA groups did not show statistically significant differences in CSM (P = 0.849). However, the hTA group showed a significantly higher other-cause mortality (P = 0.011). Conclusion In patients with clinical stage T1a renal cell carcinomas, hTA was comparable to CA in terms of CSS and CSM.However, hTA resulted in a slightly shorter OS than CA. Large-scale randomized clinical trials are required to obtain more robust evidence.

Objective: There is controversy among different guidelines regarding the use of thermal ablation to treat clinical T1a renal cell carcinomas with tumor sizes ranging from 3.1–4 cm. Therefore, we compared oncological outcomes between heat-based thermal ablation (hTA) and cryoablation (CA) in patients with solid T1a renal cell carcinomas, including those with a tumor size ≤3 cm and a tumor size of 3.1–4 cm. Materials and Methods: Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2000–2019), we identified patients with clinical T1a renal cell carcinomas that were histologically confirmed and treated with hTA or CA. After propensity score matching using a 1:1 ratio, the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were estimated and compared between the two methods. Cancer-specific mortality (CSM) was also analyzed, considering other-cause mortality as a competing risk. Results: Of the 3513 assessable patients, 1426 (40.6%) and 2087 (59.4%) were treated with hTA and CA, respectively. After propensity score matching, the hTA and CA groups included 1393 and 1393 patients, respectively. hTA was associated with shorter OS than CA with a hazard ratio of 1.17 (95% confidence interval, 1.04–1.32; P = 0.010). The hTA and CA groups did not reveal statistically significant differences in CSS with a hazard ratio of 1.07 (95% confidence interval, 0.76–1.50; P = 0.706). The hTA and CA groups did not show statistically significant differences in CSM (P = 0.849). However, the hTA group showed a significantly higher other-cause mortality (P = 0.011). Conclusion In patients with clinical stage T1a renal cell carcinomas, hTA was comparable to CA in terms of CSS and CSM.However, hTA resulted in a slightly shorter OS than CA. Large-scale randomized clinical trials are required to obtain more robust evidence.

Objective: There is controversy among different guidelines regarding the use of thermal ablation to treat clinical T1a renal cell carcinomas with tumor sizes ranging from 3.1–4 cm. Therefore, we compared oncological outcomes between heat-based thermal ablation (hTA) and cryoablation (CA) in patients with solid T1a renal cell carcinomas, including those with a tumor size ≤3 cm and a tumor size of 3.1–4 cm. Materials and Methods: Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2000–2019), we identified patients with clinical T1a renal cell carcinomas that were histologically confirmed and treated with hTA or CA. After propensity score matching using a 1:1 ratio, the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were estimated and compared between the two methods. Cancer-specific mortality (CSM) was also analyzed, considering other-cause mortality as a competing risk. Results: Of the 3513 assessable patients, 1426 (40.6%) and 2087 (59.4%) were treated with hTA and CA, respectively. After propensity score matching, the hTA and CA groups included 1393 and 1393 patients, respectively. hTA was associated with shorter OS than CA with a hazard ratio of 1.17 (95% confidence interval, 1.04–1.32; P = 0.010). The hTA and CA groups did not reveal statistically significant differences in CSS with a hazard ratio of 1.07 (95% confidence interval, 0.76–1.50; P = 0.706). The hTA and CA groups did not show statistically significant differences in CSM (P = 0.849). However, the hTA group showed a significantly higher other-cause mortality (P = 0.011). Conclusion In patients with clinical stage T1a renal cell carcinomas, hTA was comparable to CA in terms of CSS and CSM.However, hTA resulted in a slightly shorter OS than CA. Large-scale randomized clinical trials are required to obtain more robust evidence.

Objective: There is controversy among different guidelines regarding the use of thermal ablation to treat clinical T1a renal cell carcinomas with tumor sizes ranging from 3.1–4 cm. Therefore, we compared oncological outcomes between heat-based thermal ablation (hTA) and cryoablation (CA) in patients with solid T1a renal cell carcinomas, including those with a tumor size ≤3 cm and a tumor size of 3.1–4 cm. Materials and Methods: Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2000–2019), we identified patients with clinical T1a renal cell carcinomas that were histologically confirmed and treated with hTA or CA. After propensity score matching using a 1:1 ratio, the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were estimated and compared between the two methods. Cancer-specific mortality (CSM) was also analyzed, considering other-cause mortality as a competing risk. Results: Of the 3513 assessable patients, 1426 (40.6%) and 2087 (59.4%) were treated with hTA and CA, respectively. After propensity score matching, the hTA and CA groups included 1393 and 1393 patients, respectively. hTA was associated with shorter OS than CA with a hazard ratio of 1.17 (95% confidence interval, 1.04–1.32; P = 0.010). The hTA and CA groups did not reveal statistically significant differences in CSS with a hazard ratio of 1.07 (95% confidence interval, 0.76–1.50; P = 0.706). The hTA and CA groups did not show statistically significant differences in CSM (P = 0.849). However, the hTA group showed a significantly higher other-cause mortality (P = 0.011). Conclusion In patients with clinical stage T1a renal cell carcinomas, hTA was comparable to CA in terms of CSS and CSM.However, hTA resulted in a slightly shorter OS than CA. Large-scale randomized clinical trials are required to obtain more robust evidence.

Objective: There is controversy among different guidelines regarding the use of thermal ablation to treat clinical T1a renal cell carcinomas with tumor sizes ranging from 3.1–4 cm. Therefore, we compared oncological outcomes between heat-based thermal ablation (hTA) and cryoablation (CA) in patients with solid T1a renal cell carcinomas, including those with a tumor size ≤3 cm and a tumor size of 3.1–4 cm. Materials and Methods: Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2000–2019), we identified patients with clinical T1a renal cell carcinomas that were histologically confirmed and treated with hTA or CA. After propensity score matching using a 1:1 ratio, the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were estimated and compared between the two methods. Cancer-specific mortality (CSM) was also analyzed, considering other-cause mortality as a competing risk. Results: Of the 3513 assessable patients, 1426 (40.6%) and 2087 (59.4%) were treated with hTA and CA, respectively. After propensity score matching, the hTA and CA groups included 1393 and 1393 patients, respectively. hTA was associated with shorter OS than CA with a hazard ratio of 1.17 (95% confidence interval, 1.04–1.32; P = 0.010). The hTA and CA groups did not reveal statistically significant differences in CSS with a hazard ratio of 1.07 (95% confidence interval, 0.76–1.50; P = 0.706). The hTA and CA groups did not show statistically significant differences in CSM (P = 0.849). However, the hTA group showed a significantly higher other-cause mortality (P = 0.011). Conclusion In patients with clinical stage T1a renal cell carcinomas, hTA was comparable to CA in terms of CSS and CSM.However, hTA resulted in a slightly shorter OS than CA. Large-scale randomized clinical trials are required to obtain more robust evidence.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Rotarex catheter system in treating femoropopliteal artery stenosis accompanied with thrombosis. METHODS: From Jun. 2017 to Dec. 2019, the clinical data of 32 femoropopliteal artery stenosis accompanied with thrombosis cases treated with Rotarex catheter system were retrospectively analyzed. There were 23 males and 9 females aged from 50 to 89 years and the mean age was (70.7±10.3) years. Six cases had acute course of disease (≤2 weeks), 17 cases had subacute course of disease (>2 weeks, ≤3 months), and 9 cases had chronic course of disease (>3 months). Mean lesion length was (23.4±13.7) cm, mean occlusion length was (19.9±13.3) cm, and in-stent occlusion 7 cases. The superficial femoral artery (SFA) was involved in 13 cases, the popliteal artery (PA) was involved in 8 cases, and both SFA and PA were involved in the other 11 cases. All the cases were treated with Rotarex catheter system. When necessary, suction with large lumen catheter was enabled. Residual stenosis was treated with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA). Drug-coated balloon (DCB) was only used in patients with financial status, and stent was used only when it was necessary. Heparin was used for 24 h after procedures, and after that, antiplatelet agents were used. Doppler ultrasonography was taken during the followed-up. RESULTS: Technical success was 100%, and mean procedure time was (107.4±21.5) min. 8F (1F≈0.33 mm) and 6F Rotarex catheter were used in 27 and 5 cases respectively. In 27 cases, forward flow was obtained immediately after debulking with Rotarex catheter, and in the other 5 cases, suction with large lumen catheters were used. PTA was used in all 32 cases. DCB were used in 8 cases, of which 4 were used in in-stent stenosis. Twelve cases were implanted stents. There were no perioperative deaths. The only one procedure related complication was distal embolism. We took out the thrombus with guiding catheter. In all cases, mean hospital stay were (4.6±1.5) d. The ankle brachial index increased from 0.32±0.15 to 0.86±0.10 after treatment (t=-16.847, P < 0.001). The Rutherford stages decreased significantly (Z=-4.518, P < 0.001). All the patients were followed up for 6.0-36.0 months, and the median time was 16.0 months. 2 cases stopped antiplatelet agents, which resulted in acute thrombosis. Another percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy and PTA were taken in one of them. Two cases died of cardiovascular disease during the follow-up, and no amputation was observed. Target lesion restenosis occurred in 7 cases during the follow-up, and target lesion revascularization (TLR) was taken in two of them. CONCLUSION In treating femoropopliteal artery stenosis accompanied with thrombosis, Rotarex catheter can remove thrombus effectively, and that can expose underlying lesions and reduce stent use and complications rates. It is a safe and effective method.
Male ; Female ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Femoral Artery/surgery* ; Retrospective Studies ; Constriction, Pathologic ; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors ; Treatment Outcome ; Thrombosis ; Catheters

Objective:To analyze the relationship between the high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and anxiety levels in patients hospitalized with cardiovascular-related diseases and hypertension.Methods:A total of 221 patients hospitalized with cardiovascular-related diseases in the Fuwai Hospital were selected by a voluntary sampling method from September to December 2021. Participants were divided into hypertensive and non-hypertensive groups ( n=119 and n=102) based on the diagnosis of hypertension in their inpatient medical records. Anxiety levels were assessed using the Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale, and the levels of serum hs-CRP were estimated by automatic immunoanalyzer. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the relationship between hs-CRP and anxiety. Results:In the hypertensive group, the risk of anxiety in patients with abnormal hs-CRP (>3 mg/L) was 4.239 times (95% CI: 1.569-11.748, P=0.005) higher than those in normal hs-CRP (≤3 mg/L). In turn, compared with patients without anxiety, those with anxiety had 3.878 times greater probability of experiencing abnormal hs-CRP (95% CI: 1.495-10.062, P=0.005), while those with mild anxiety and moderate to severe anxiety had 4.525 times (95% CI: 1.392-14.714, P=0.012) and 3.286 times (95% CI: 0.911-11.357, P=0.070) greater odds of experiencing abnormal hs-CRP, respectively. No similar significant association was seen in the non-hypertensive group. Conclusion:There is an interrelationship between elevated hs-CRP and anxiety in hospitalized patients with cardiovascular-related diseases and hypertension.

LIN28 is an RNA binding protein with important roles in early embryo development, stem cell differentiation/reprogramming, tumorigenesis and metabolism. Previous studies have focused mainly on its role in the cytosol where it interacts with Let-7 microRNA precursors or mRNAs, and few have addressed LIN28's role within the nucleus. Here, we show that LIN28 displays dynamic temporal and spatial expression during murine embryo development. Maternal LIN28 expression drops upon exit from the 2-cell stage, and zygotic LIN28 protein is induced at the forming nucleolus during 4-cell to blastocyst stage development, to become dominantly expressed in the cytosol after implantation. In cultured pluripotent stem cells (PSCs), loss of LIN28 led to nucleolar stress and activation of a 2-cell/4-cell-like transcriptional program characterized by the expression of endogenous retrovirus genes. Mechanistically, LIN28 binds to small nucleolar RNAs and rRNA to maintain nucleolar integrity, and its loss leads to nucleolar phase separation defects, ribosomal stress and activation of P53 which in turn binds to and activates 2C transcription factor Dux. LIN28 also resides in a complex containing the nucleolar factor Nucleolin (NCL) and the transcriptional repressor TRIM28, and LIN28 loss leads to reduced occupancy of the NCL/TRIM28 complex on the Dux and rDNA loci, and thus de-repressed Dux and reduced rRNA expression. Lin28 knockout cells with nucleolar stress are more likely to assume a slowly cycling, translationally inert and anabolically inactive state, which is a part of previously unappreciated 2C-like transcriptional program. These findings elucidate novel roles for nucleolar LIN28 in PSCs, and a new mechanism linking 2C program and nucleolar functions in PSCs and early embryo development.
Animals ; Cell Differentiation ; Embryo, Mammalian/metabolism* ; Embryonic Development ; Mice ; Pluripotent Stem Cells/metabolism* ; RNA, Messenger/genetics* ; RNA, Ribosomal ; RNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism* ; Transcription Factors/metabolism* ; Zygote/metabolism*

Adult ; Aged ; China/epidemiology* ; Cohort Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Metabolic Syndrome/etiology* ; Middle Aged ; Parks, Recreational/supply & distribution* ; Prevalence ; Residence Characteristics/statistics & numerical data* ; Rural Population/statistics & numerical data* ; Young Adult