1.Participation of GATA-3 in regulation of bone healing through transcriptional upregulation of bcl-x(L) expression.
Mei Hsiu LIAO ; Pei I LIN ; Wei Pin HO ; Wing P CHAN ; Ta Liang CHEN ; Ruei Ming CHEN
Experimental & Molecular Medicine 2017;49(11):e398-
We have previously demonstrated the expression of GATA-DNA-binding protein (GATA)-3, a transcription factor, in osteoblasts and have verified its function in transducing cell survival signaling. This translational study was further designed to evaluate the roles of GATA-3 in regulating bone healing and to explore its possible mechanisms. A metaphyseal bone defect was created in the left femurs of male ICR mice. Analysis by micro-computed topography showed that the bone volume, trabecular bone number and trabecular thickness were augmented and that the trabecular pattern factor decreased. Interestingly, immunohistological analyses showed specific expression of GATA-3 in the defect area. In addition, colocalized expression of GATA-3 and alkaline phosphatase was observed at the wound site. As the fracture healed, the amounts of phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated GATA-3 concurrently increased. Separately, GATA-3 mRNA was induced during bone healing, and, levels of Runx2 mRNA and protein were also increased. The results of confocal microscopy and co-immunoprecipitation showed an association between nuclear GATA-3 and Runx2 in the area of insult. In parallel with fracture healing, Bcl-XL mRNA was significantly triggered. A bioinformatic search revealed the existence of a GATA-3-specific DNA-binding element in the promoter region of the bcl-x(L) gene. Analysis by chromatin immunoprecipitation assays further demonstrated transactivation activity by which GATA-3 regulated bcl-x(L) gene expression. Therefore, this study shows that GATA-3 participates in the healing of bone fractures via regulating bcl-xL gene expression, owing to its association with Runx2. In the clinic, GATA-3 may be used as a biomarker for diagnoses/prognoses or as a therapeutic target for bone diseases, such as bone fractures.
Alkaline Phosphatase
;
Animals
;
Bone Diseases
;
Cell Survival
;
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation
;
Computational Biology
;
Femur
;
Fracture Healing
;
Fractures, Bone
;
Gene Expression
;
Humans
;
Immunoprecipitation
;
Male
;
Mice
;
Mice, Inbred ICR
;
Microscopy, Confocal
;
Osteoblasts
;
Promoter Regions, Genetic
;
RNA, Messenger
;
Transcription Factors
;
Transcriptional Activation
;
Up-Regulation*
;
Wounds and Injuries
2.Treatment outcomes of patients with stage II pure endometrioid-type endometrial cancer: a Taiwanese Gynecologic Oncology Group (TGOG-2006) retrospective cohort study.
Hung Chun FU ; Jen Ruei CHEN ; Min Yu CHEN ; Keng Fu HSU ; Wen Fang CHENG ; An Jen CHIANG ; Yu Min KE ; Yu Chieh CHEN ; Yin Yi CHANG ; Chia Yen HUANG ; Chieh Yi KANG ; Yuan Yee KAN ; Sheng Mou HSIAO ; Ming Shyen YEN
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2018;29(5):e76-
OBJECTIVE: Choice of hysterectomy and adjuvant treatment for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 stage II endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) is still controversial. Aims of this study were to evaluate survival benefits and adverse effects of different hysterectomies with or without adjuvant radiotherapy (RT), and to identify prognostic factors. METHODS: The patients at 14 member hospitals of the Taiwanese Gynecologic Oncology Group from 1992 to 2013 were retrospectively investigated. Patients were divided into simple hysterectomy (SH) alone, SH with RT, radical hysterectomy (RH) alone, and RH with RT groups. Endpoints were recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), adverse effects and prognostic factors for survival. RESULTS: Total of 246 patients were enrolled. The 5-year RFS, OS, DSS and recurrence rates for the entire cohort were 89.5%, 94.3%, 96.2% and 10.2%, respectively. Patients receiving RH had more adverse effects including blood loss (p < 0.001), recurrent urinary tract infections (p = 0.013), and leg lymphedema (p = 0.038). Age over 50-year (HR = 9.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2–70.9) and grade 3 histology (HR = 7.28; 95% CI, 1.45–36.6) were independent predictors of OS. Grade 3 histology was an independent predictor of RFS (HR = 5.13; 95% CI, 1.38–19.1) and DSS (HR = 5.97; 95% CI, 1.06–58.7). Patients receiving adjuvant RT had lower locoregional recurrence (p = 0.046), but no impact on survival. CONCLUSION: Different treatment modalities yield similar survival outcomes. Patients receiving SH with RT had lower locoregional recurrent with acceptable morbidity. Age and tumor grading remained significant predictors for survival among patients with FIGO 2009 stage II EEC.
Cohort Studies*
;
Endometrial Neoplasms*
;
European Union
;
Female
;
Gynecology
;
Humans
;
Hysterectomy
;
Leg
;
Lymphedema
;
Neoplasm Grading
;
Obstetrics
;
Radiotherapy
;
Radiotherapy, Adjuvant
;
Recurrence
;
Retrospective Studies*
;
Urinary Tract Infections
;
Uterine Neoplasms