OBJECTIVE: To explore whether anchor placement could improve holding force of anchors under the condition of osteoporosis, in order to solve the problem of clinical treatment for rotator cuff injury associated with osteoporosis. METHODS: Twenty one bone modules, which included 13 males and 8 females aged from 60 to 95 years old with an average of (77.6±10.3) years old, and were divided into three experimental groups named as group A, B and C, and 7 in each group. A single anchor was inserted in group A, two parallel anchors were screwed in group B, and a single anchor was screwed in group C, then after the anchor was pulled out, anchor was screwed back and another anchor was screwed in close to the anchor. X-ray examination was performed in all three groups to observe situation of anchor in osteoporosis module; the maximum axial pull-out force (Fmax) of the three groups was measured. RESULTS: Fmax of group A, B and C was (170.35±31.21) N, (314.47±23.47) N, and(292.74±25.36) N, respectively. Compared with group A, there were statistical difference of Fmax in group B and C(P<0.05), while no difference of Fmax between group B and C(P>0.05). CONCLUSION In the case of loose anchors in the osteoporosis module, holding force of anchors could be improved by adding anchor, which provide a remedy for single anchor failure in clinical operation.
Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Osteoporosis/surgery* ; Radiography ; Rotator Cuff Injuries/surgery* ; Suture Anchors ; Suture Techniques

Rotator cuff deficient arthritis of the glenohumeral joint, especially cuff tear arthropathy, has proved a challenging clinical entity for orthopaedic surgeons ever since Charles Neer originally detailed the problem in 1983. Understanding has improved regarding the pathophysiology and pathomechanics underlying cuff tear arthropathy. Surgical reconstruction options can lead to excellent outcomes for patients afflicted with these painful and functionally limited shoulders. Humeral hemiarthroplasty and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty have jumped to the forefront in the treatment of cuff tear arthropathy. As studies continue to look at the results of these procedures in cuff tear arthropathy, existing indications and treatment algorithms will be further refined. In this article the history and pathophysiology of cuff tear arthropathy are reviewed. Additionally, the clinical findings and results of surgical reconstruction are discussed.
Arthritis/diagnosis/etiology/*surgery ; Arthroplasty, Replacement/adverse effects/methods ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Rotator Cuff/*injuries ; Shoulder Joint/radiography/*surgery ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

BACKGROUND: We retrospectively assessed the clinical outcomes and investigated risk factors influencing retear after arthroscopic suture bridge repair technique for rotator cuff tear through clinical assessment and magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA). METHODS: Between January 2008 and April 2011, sixty-two cases of full-thickness rotator cuff tear were treated with arthroscopic suture bridge repair technique and follow-up MRA were performed. The mean age was 56.1 years, and mean follow-up period was 27.4 months. Clinical and functional outcomes were assessed using range of motion, Korean shoulder score, Constant score, and UCLA score. Radiological outcome was evaluated with preoperative and follow-up MRA. Potential predictive factors that influenced cuff retear, such as age, gender, geometric patterns of tear, size of cuff tear, acromioplasty, fatty degeneration, atrophy of cuff muscle, retraction of supraspinatus, involved muscles of cuff and osteolysis around the suture anchor were evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty cases (48.4%) revealed retear on MRA. In univariable analysis, retear was significantly more frequent in over 60 years age group (62.5%) than under 60 years age group (39.5%; p = 0.043), and also in medium to large-sized tear than small-sized tear (p = 0.003). There was significant difference in geometric pattern of tear (p = 0.015). In multivariable analysis, only age (p = 0.036) and size of tear (p = 0.030) revealed a significant difference. The mean active range of motion for forward flexion, abduction, external rotation at the side and internal rotation at the side were significantly improved at follow-up (p < 0.05). The mean Korean shoulder score, Constant score, and UCLA score increased significantly at follow-up (p < 0.01). The range of motion, Korean shoulder score, Constant score, and UCLA score did not differ significantly between the groups with retear and intact repairs (p > 0.05). The locations of retear were insertion site in 10 cases (33.3%) and musculotendinous junction in 20 cases (66.7%; p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Suture bridge repair technique for rotator cuff tear showed improved clinical results. Cuff integrity after repair did not affect clinical results. Age of over 60 years and size of cuff tear larger than 1 cm were factors influencing rotator cuff retear after arthroscopic suture bridge repair technique.
Adult ; Aged ; Analysis of Variance ; Arthroscopy/*methods ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Orthopedic Procedures/*methods ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Retrospective Studies ; Rotator Cuff/*injuries/radiography/*surgery ; *Suture Techniques ; Treatment Outcome