Objective: To study the role of antibodies in protection against Leishmania tropica (L. tropica) infection in the experimental model of BALB/c mice.Methods: BALB/c mice were vaccinated against L. tropica by soluble Leishmania antigen or recombinant L. tropica stress-inducible protein-1 (LtSTI1) of L. tropica, and against Leishmania major (L. major) by soluble Leishmania antigen. Monophosphoryl lipid A was used as an adjuvant. The L. tropica- or L. major-vaccinated mice were challenged by L. tropica or L. major, respectively. The levels of anti-Leishmania antibodies (IgG1 and IgG2a) were determined after vaccination and after challenge. Results: All vaccinated groups caused a higher antibody response in comparison with the control group. The L. major-vaccinated group showed lower IgG1 response than the control group after the challenge. Conversely, in L. tropica-vaccinated mice, the levels of antibodies were higher than the control group. Moreover, the group receiving rLtSTI1 and monophosphoryl lipid A showed higher levels of antibodies than those of the rLtSTI1 group. In vaccinated mice, antibody responses against L. tropica remained high until 16 weeks after the challenge. Conclusions: The higher levels of post-challenge antibodies are associated with protective vaccination against L. tropica infection of BALB/c mice. Our findings provide new insight into the association of antibody with vaccine-induced protective immunity against L. tropica infection. More studies are needed to clarify the role of antibody in protection against L. tropica.

Objective: To compare limiting dilution assay and real-time PCR methods in Leishmania tropica parasite load measurement in vaccinated mice.Methods: BALB/c mice were vaccinated by Leishmania tropica soluble Leishmania antigen or recombinant Leishmania tropica stress-inducible protein-1 with/without adjuvant. After three vaccinations, mice were challenged by Leishmania tropica promastigotes. Two months after challenge, the draining lymph nodes of mice footpad were removed and parasite load was assayed by limiting dilution assay and real-time PCR methods. Limiting dilution assay was done by diluting tissue samples to extinction in a biphasic medium. For real-time PCR, DNA of the lymph nodes was extracted, equal dilutions of each sample were prepared and hot-start real-time PCR was done using appropriate primers. The data of the two methods were compared by appropriate statistical methods. Results: Both methods were able to measure different levels of parasite load in vaccinated/unvaccinated mice. In addition, wherever parasite load of a group was estimated high (or low) by one method, the estimated parasite load by another method was the same, although statistically significant differences were found between some groups. Conclusions: Both methods lead to approximately similar results in terms of differentiating parasite load of the experimental groups. However, due to the lower errors and faster process, the real-time PCR method is preferred.

Objective: To study the role of antibodies in protection against Leishmania tropica (L. tropica) infection in the experimental model of BALB/c mice. Methods: BALB/c mice were vaccinated against L. tropica by soluble Leishmania antigen or recombinant L. tropica stress-inducible protein-1 (LtSTI1) of L. tropica, and against Leishmania major (L. major) by soluble Leishmania antigen. Monophosphoryl lipid A was used as an adjuvant. The L. tropica- or L. major-vaccinated mice were challenged by L. tropica or L. major, respectively. The levels of anti-Leishmania antibodies (IgG1 and IgG2a) were determined after vaccination and after challenge. Results: All vaccinated groups caused a higher antibody response in comparison with the control group. The L. major-vaccinated group showed lower IgG1 response than the control group after the challenge. Conversely, in L. tropica-vaccinated mice, the levels of antibodies were higher than the control group. Moreover, the group receiving rLtSTI1 and monophosphoryl lipid A showed higher levels of antibodies than those of the rLtSTI1 group. In vaccinated mice, antibody responses against L. tropica remained high until 16 weeks after the challenge. Conclusions: The higher levels of post-challenge antibodies are associated with protective vaccination against L. tropica infection of BALB/c mice. Our findings provide new insight into the association of antibody with vaccine-induced protective immunity against L. tropica infection. More studies are needed to clarify the role of antibody in protection against L. tropica.

Objective: To compare limiting dilution assay and real-time PCR methods in Leishmania tropica parasite load measurement in vaccinated mice. Methods: BALB/c mice were vaccinated by Leishmania tropica soluble Leishmania antigen or recombinant Leishmania tropica stress-inducibleprotein-1 with/without adjuvant. After three vaccinations, mice were challenged by Leishmania tropica promastigotes. Two months after challenge, the draining lymph nodes of mice footpad were removed and parasite load was assayed by limiting dilution assay and real-time PCR methods. Limiting dilution assay was done by diluting tissue samples to extinction in a biphasic medium. For real-time PCR, DNA of the lymph nodes was extracted, equal dilutions of each sample were prepared and hot-start real-time PCR was done using appropriate primers. The data of the two methods were compared by appropriate statistical methods. Results: Both methods were able to measure different levels of parasite load in vaccinated/unvaccinated mice. In addition, wherever parasite load of a group was estimated high (or low) by one method, the estimated parasite load by another method was the same, although statistically significant differences were found between some groups. Conclusions: Both methods lead to approximately similar results in terms of differentiating parasite load of the experimental groups. However, due to the lower errors and faster process, the real-time PCR method is preferred.