1.Associations between income and survival in cholangiocarcinoma:A comprehensive subtype-based analysis
Calvin X. GENG ; Anuragh R. GUDUR ; Jagannath KADIYALA ; Daniel S. STRAND ; Vanessa M. SHAMI ; Andrew Y. WANG ; Alexander PODBOY ; Tri M. LE ; Matthew REILLEY ; Victor ZAYDFUDIM ; Ross C. D. BUERLEIN
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery 2024;28(2):144-154
Background:
s/Aims: Socioeconomic determinants of health are incompletely characterized in cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). We assessed how socioeconomic status influences initial treatment decisions and survival outcomes in patients with CCA, additionally performing multiple sub-analyses based on anatomic location of the primary tumor.
Methods:
Observational study using the 2018 submission of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-18 Database. In total, 5,476 patients from 2004−2015 with a CCA were separated based on median household income (MHI) into low income (< 25th percentile of MHI) and high income (> 25th percentile of MHI) groups. Seventy-three percent of patients had complete follow up data, and were included in survival analyses. Survival and treatment outcomes were calculated using R-studio.
Results:
When all cases of CCA were included, the high-income group was more likely than the low-income to receive surgery, chemotherapy, and local tumor destruction modalities. Initial treatment modality based on income differed significantly between tumor locations. Patients of lower income had higher overall and cancer-specific mortality at 2 and 5 years. Non-cancer mortality was similar between the groups. Survival differences identified in the overall cohort were maintained in the intrahepatic CCA subgroup. No differences between income groups were noted in cancer-specific or overall mortality for perihilar tumors, with variable differences in the distal cohort.
Conclusions
Lower income was associated with higher rates of cancer-specific mortality and lower rates of surgical resection in CCA. There were significant differences in treatment selection and outcomes between intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal tumors. Population-based strategies aimed at identifying possible etiologies for these disparities are paramount to improving patient outcomes.
2.Enhanced efficiency of stannous penetration and lipopolysaccharide neutralization by a novel stabilized stannous-containing sodium fluoride dentifrice
Linhua LIU ; Yunming SHI ; Hongmei LI ; Tao HE ; Jiahui LI ; Yanyan HE ; Ross STRAND ; Weili DONG
Journal of Practical Stomatology 2017;33(6):758-762
Objective:To evaluate the dental biofilm penetration efficiency of a novel stabilized stannous-containing sodium fluoride dentifric(EXP) and its lipopolysaccharide (LPS) neutralization efficiency.Methods:A controlled,randomized,examiner-blind in situ clinical trial was conducted with the treatment of PBS(control),EXP and a marketed stannous-containing sodium fluoride dentifrice (MKD).Fluorescent dye,fluorescent probe and fluorescence colocalization were used for sample examination and analysis.Results:EXP offered better stannous penetration into the biofilm than MKD and PBS(P <0.05),as well as greater LPS neutralization efficiency(P <0.05).There was a 96.52% overlap of stannous ions and bounded LPS at the same sites treated by EXP.Conclusion:EXP is more effective than MKD in the delivery of stannous into the biofilm and in the neutralization of LPS.
3.Comparative accuracy of four guidelines to predict high-grade dysplasia or malignancy in surgically resected pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms:Small nuances between guidelines lead to vastly different results
Irene C. PEREZ ; Andrew BIGELOW ; Vanessa M. SHAMI ; Bryan G. SAUER ; Andrew Y. WANG ; Daniel S. STRAND ; Alexander J. PODBOY ; Todd W. BAUER ; Victor M. ZAYDFUDIM ; Allan TSUNG ; Ross C. D. BUERLEIN
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery 2024;28(4):483-493
Background:
s/Aims: The guidelines regarding the management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) all have slightly different surgical indications for high-risk lesions. We aim to retrospectively compare the accuracy of four guidelines in recommending surgery for high-risk IPMNs, and assess the accuracy of elevated CA-19-9 levels and imaging characteristics of IPMNs considered high-risk in predicting malignancy or high-grade dysplasia (HGD).
Methods:
The final histopathological diagnosis of surgically resected high-risk IPMNs during 2013−2020 were compared to preoperative surgical indications, as enumerated in four guidelines: the 2015 American Gastroenterological Association (AGA), 2017 International Consensus, 2018 European Study Group, and 2018 American College of Gastroenterology (ACG). Surgery was considered “justified” if histopathology of the surgical specimen showed HGD/malignancy, or there was postoperative symptomatic improvement.
Results:
Surgery was postoperatively justified in 26/65 (40.0%) cases. All IPMNs with HGD/malignancy were detected by the 2018 ACG and the combined (absolute and relative criteria) 2018 European guidelines. The combined (“high-risk stigmata” and “worrisome features”) 2017 International guideline missed 1/19 (5.3%) IPMNs with HGD/malignancy. The 2015 AGA guideline missed the most cases (11/19, 57.9%) of IPMNs with HGD/malignancy. We found the features most-associated with HGD/malignancy were pancreatic ductal dilation, and elevated CA-19-9 levels.
Conclusions
Following the 2015 AGA guideline results in the highest rate of missed HGD/malignancy, but the lowest rate of operating on IPMNs without these features; meanwhile, the 2018 ACG and the combined (absolute and relative criteria) 2018 European guidelines result in more operations for IPMNs without HGD/malignancy, but the lowest rates of missed HGD/malignancy in IPMNs.
4.Comparative accuracy of four guidelines to predict high-grade dysplasia or malignancy in surgically resected pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms:Small nuances between guidelines lead to vastly different results
Irene C. PEREZ ; Andrew BIGELOW ; Vanessa M. SHAMI ; Bryan G. SAUER ; Andrew Y. WANG ; Daniel S. STRAND ; Alexander J. PODBOY ; Todd W. BAUER ; Victor M. ZAYDFUDIM ; Allan TSUNG ; Ross C. D. BUERLEIN
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery 2024;28(4):483-493
Background:
s/Aims: The guidelines regarding the management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) all have slightly different surgical indications for high-risk lesions. We aim to retrospectively compare the accuracy of four guidelines in recommending surgery for high-risk IPMNs, and assess the accuracy of elevated CA-19-9 levels and imaging characteristics of IPMNs considered high-risk in predicting malignancy or high-grade dysplasia (HGD).
Methods:
The final histopathological diagnosis of surgically resected high-risk IPMNs during 2013−2020 were compared to preoperative surgical indications, as enumerated in four guidelines: the 2015 American Gastroenterological Association (AGA), 2017 International Consensus, 2018 European Study Group, and 2018 American College of Gastroenterology (ACG). Surgery was considered “justified” if histopathology of the surgical specimen showed HGD/malignancy, or there was postoperative symptomatic improvement.
Results:
Surgery was postoperatively justified in 26/65 (40.0%) cases. All IPMNs with HGD/malignancy were detected by the 2018 ACG and the combined (absolute and relative criteria) 2018 European guidelines. The combined (“high-risk stigmata” and “worrisome features”) 2017 International guideline missed 1/19 (5.3%) IPMNs with HGD/malignancy. The 2015 AGA guideline missed the most cases (11/19, 57.9%) of IPMNs with HGD/malignancy. We found the features most-associated with HGD/malignancy were pancreatic ductal dilation, and elevated CA-19-9 levels.
Conclusions
Following the 2015 AGA guideline results in the highest rate of missed HGD/malignancy, but the lowest rate of operating on IPMNs without these features; meanwhile, the 2018 ACG and the combined (absolute and relative criteria) 2018 European guidelines result in more operations for IPMNs without HGD/malignancy, but the lowest rates of missed HGD/malignancy in IPMNs.
5.Comparative accuracy of four guidelines to predict high-grade dysplasia or malignancy in surgically resected pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms:Small nuances between guidelines lead to vastly different results
Irene C. PEREZ ; Andrew BIGELOW ; Vanessa M. SHAMI ; Bryan G. SAUER ; Andrew Y. WANG ; Daniel S. STRAND ; Alexander J. PODBOY ; Todd W. BAUER ; Victor M. ZAYDFUDIM ; Allan TSUNG ; Ross C. D. BUERLEIN
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery 2024;28(4):483-493
Background:
s/Aims: The guidelines regarding the management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) all have slightly different surgical indications for high-risk lesions. We aim to retrospectively compare the accuracy of four guidelines in recommending surgery for high-risk IPMNs, and assess the accuracy of elevated CA-19-9 levels and imaging characteristics of IPMNs considered high-risk in predicting malignancy or high-grade dysplasia (HGD).
Methods:
The final histopathological diagnosis of surgically resected high-risk IPMNs during 2013−2020 were compared to preoperative surgical indications, as enumerated in four guidelines: the 2015 American Gastroenterological Association (AGA), 2017 International Consensus, 2018 European Study Group, and 2018 American College of Gastroenterology (ACG). Surgery was considered “justified” if histopathology of the surgical specimen showed HGD/malignancy, or there was postoperative symptomatic improvement.
Results:
Surgery was postoperatively justified in 26/65 (40.0%) cases. All IPMNs with HGD/malignancy were detected by the 2018 ACG and the combined (absolute and relative criteria) 2018 European guidelines. The combined (“high-risk stigmata” and “worrisome features”) 2017 International guideline missed 1/19 (5.3%) IPMNs with HGD/malignancy. The 2015 AGA guideline missed the most cases (11/19, 57.9%) of IPMNs with HGD/malignancy. We found the features most-associated with HGD/malignancy were pancreatic ductal dilation, and elevated CA-19-9 levels.
Conclusions
Following the 2015 AGA guideline results in the highest rate of missed HGD/malignancy, but the lowest rate of operating on IPMNs without these features; meanwhile, the 2018 ACG and the combined (absolute and relative criteria) 2018 European guidelines result in more operations for IPMNs without HGD/malignancy, but the lowest rates of missed HGD/malignancy in IPMNs.