1.Stellate ganglion catheter retention with discontinuous block on efficacy and safety in the treatment of sudden deafness.
Hui GAO ; Zhizhuo ZHANG ; Wenping GUO ; Gaifang ZHANG
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2015;29(14):1291-1294
OBJECTIVE:
To investigate effect and safty evaluation of stellate ganglion catheter retention with discontinuous block on sudden deafness.
METHOD:
One hundred and twenty-six patiens with sudden monaural deafness were randomly divided into Catheterp and block and control groups with 42 cases in each group. All patients' throats were given conventional blood activating drugs, hormone and hyperbaric oxygen therapy. stellate ganglion puncture retained catheter were administrated to the patients in catheter group followed by ropivacaine block 1 times/day, block group stellate ganglion puncture and ropivacaine block 1 times/day. The patients in control group were only received routine comprehensive treatment. Patients in both catheter group and block groups were treated by hyperbaric oxygen therapy after the block treatment. Curative effects of three groups were observed. The patients' satisfaction, heart rate, the chages of blood pressure before and after the block, detachment of tubes, and adverse drug reaction were recorded.
RESULT:
The effect of the treatment in both catheter group, block group was better than in control group (85.7%, 37 cases); 83.3%, 35 cases) vs 64.3%, 27 cases, P < 0.05). The satisfactory rate in the patients in catheter group was significantly higher than block group (83.3%, 35 cases vs 61.9%, 26 cases, P < 0.05). The heart rate and the blood pressure before and 5 minutes after catheterization in catheter group and block groupwere changed obviously. Moreover, no adverse drug reaction and detachment of tubes were observed.
CONCLUSION
It is a safe and effective administration of stellate ganglion catheter retention with interrupted ropivacaine block.
Amides
;
therapeutic use
;
Autonomic Nerve Block
;
methods
;
Blood Pressure
;
Catheterization
;
Catheters
;
Hearing Loss, Sudden
;
surgery
;
Heart Rate
;
Humans
;
Hyperbaric Oxygenation
;
Ropivacaine
;
Stellate Ganglion
;
surgery
2.Effect of dexmedetomidine on supraclavicular brachial plexus block: a randomized double blind prospective study.
Yan LI ; Hui WANG ; Ying DENG ; Yao YAO ; Min LI
Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences) 2018;50(5):845-849
OBJECTIVE:
To evaluate the effect of dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine on brachial plexus block in patients scheduled for elective shoulder arthroscopy.
METHODS:
Ninety patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I or II, scheduled for elective shoulder arthroscopy, were randomly divided into three groups. In group R (n=30), the patients were given 10 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine in branchial plexus block (interscalene approach guided by ultrasound), in group D1 (n=30), the patients were given 10 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine (interscalene approach guided by ultrasound) + dexmedetomidine 0.2 μg/(kg×h) (intravenous pump infusion), and in group D2 (n=30), the patients were given 10 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine (interscalene approach guided by ultrasound) + dexedetomidine 0.7 μg/(kg×h) (intravenous pump infusion). To evaluate the effect of brachial plexus block before general anesthesia. Group D1 and group D2 were given dexmedetomidine intravenously for 1.0 μg/kg during 10 min, then the drug was pumped by 0.2 μg/(kg×h) and 0.7 μg/(kg×h) respectively until 30 min before the operation finished. Changes in systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate (HR), and before anesthesia (T0), 10 min (T1), 30 min (T2) after giving dexmedetomidine, discontinue medication (T3), after operation (T4), and extubation (T5) were investigated. Motor and sensory block onset times, block durations, and duration of analgesia were recorded. The scores of pain after operation and the adverse effects of shiver, hypopiesia, drowsiness, and blood loss were recorded during operation.
RESULTS:
Compared with group R, the duration of analgesia and duration of sensory block in group D1 and group D2 were significant longer (P<0.01), there was no significant difference between groups D1 and D2 (P>0.05). Compared with group R, at each time point of T1-T5, the heart rate and systolic blood pressure in group D1 and group D2 were significantly decreased (P<0.01). Compared with D1 group, the incidence of hypotension and bradycardia in group D2 were significantly different (P<0.05).
CONCLUSION
Intravenous dexmedetomidine could prolong the duration of analgesia time and sensory block within the brachial plexus block, inhibiting the stress response during arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Compared with high-dose, low-dose can provide safer and better clinical effect and reduce the adverse effects of dexmedetomidine.
Analgesics, Non-Narcotic
;
Anesthetics, Local/therapeutic use*
;
Arthroscopy
;
Brachial Plexus
;
Brachial Plexus Block
;
Dexmedetomidine/therapeutic use*
;
Double-Blind Method
;
Humans
;
Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacology*
;
Prospective Studies
;
Ropivacaine/therapeutic use*
;
Shoulder Joint/surgery*