1.Correlation of Family History of Gastric Cancer With Helicobacter pylori Infection and Pathological Changes of Gastric Mucosa in Patients With Chronic Gastritis
Tingting ZHU ; Rongqiu ZHANG ; Yingchun DOU ; Changhong ZHOU
Chinese Journal of Gastroenterology 2018;23(1):42-44
Background:Family history of gastric cancer is an important indicator of genetic susceptibility.Studies have shown that the family history of gastric cancer might have impact on Helicobacter pylori (Hp) infection and clinicopathological manifestations in patients with chronic gastritis.Aims:To investigate the correlation of family history of gastric cancer with Hp infection and pathological changes of gastric mucosa in patients with chronic gastritis.Methods:A total of 312 patients with chronic gastritis were enrolled to study the relationship between family history of gastric cancer and Hp infection,degree of gastric mucosal inflammation,activity of inflammation,and degree of atrophy and intestinal metaplasia.Results:In the 312 patients with chronic gastritis,165 (52.9%) had family history of gastric cancer,and 147 (47.1%) without family history of gastric cancer.Incidence of Hp infection,degree of gastric mucosal atrophy and intestinal metaplasia in patients with family history of gastric cancer were significantly higher than those without (P < 0.05),but no significant differences in degree and activity of inflammation were found between the two groups (P > 0.05).Conclusions:The incidence of Hp infection is higher in chronic gastritis patients with family history of gastric cancer.Family history of gastric cancer may aggravate gastric mucosal atrophy and intestinal metaplasia.
2.Effectiveness of the "14 plus 7 day quarantine" and "nucleic acid plus total antibody testing" strategy for screening imported patients with COVID-19 in Xiamen
Litong SHEN ; Zhenhua DUAN ; Zehui CHEN ; Tianci YANG ; Tao LIN ; Rongqiu ZHANG ; Lina JIANG ; Xiaohong ZENG ; Huixin WEN ; Qinyong ZHAN ; Yingying SU ; Yali ZHANG ; Zhibin PENG ; Jiandong ZHENG ; Rongrong ZHENG ; Ying QIN ; Quan YUAN ; Changrong CHEN
Chinese Journal of Epidemiology 2021;42(6):1002-1007
Objective:To analysis effectiveness of the "14 plus 7 day quarantine" and "nucleic acid plus total antibody testing" strategy (combined screening strategy) for screenin the imported patients with COVID-19 in Xiamen.Methods:The study populations were overseas travelers arriving in Xiamen from March 17 to December 31, 2020, and overseas travelers who had quarantine outside Xiamen for less than 21 days from July 18 to December 31, 2020. Data were collected and analyzed on the timing of detection, pathways, and test results of the imported patients with COVID-19 after implementing combined screening strategy.Results:A total of 304 imported patients with COVID-19 were found from 174 628 overseas travelers and 943 overseas travelers from other cities. A total of 163 cases (53.6%) were diagnosed by multitime, multisite intensive nucleic acid testing after positive finding in total antibody testing. Among them, 27 (8.9%) were first positive for nucleic acid in 14 plus 7 day quarantine and 136 were first positive for nucleic acid in 14-day quarantine. Only 8 of these individuals were tested positive for nucleic acid after positive total antibody testing. The other 128 individuals were tested positive for nucleic acid after being negative for average 2.3 times (maximum of 6 times). Aditional 155 cases might be detected by using the combined "14 plus 7 day quarantine" and " nucleic acid plus total antibody testing" strategy compared with "14-day quarantine and nucleic acid testing" strategy, accounting for 51.0% of the total inbound infections. So the combined screening strategy doubled the detection rate for imported patients with COVID-19. No second-generation case caused by overseas travelers had been reported in Xiamen as of February 26, 2021.Conclusions:Xiamen's combined screening strategy can effectively screen the imported patients with COVID-19 who were first positive for nucleic acid after 14 day quarantine. Compared with "14 day quarantine and nucleic acid testing", the combined screening strategy improved detection rate and further reduced the risk of the secondary transmission caused by the imported patients with COVID-19.
3. Clinical Analysis of Deep Learning Technology in Assisting Diagnosis of Colorectal Polyps
Lianghui JIANG ; Rongqiu ZHANG ; Xinying MENG ; Changhong ZHOU ; Xin SUN ; Xuetong LI
Chinese Journal of Gastroenterology 2020;25(7):389-394
Background: Computer-aided diagnosis based on deep learning technology is a research hotspot in the field of gastroenterology, and computer-aided diagnosis of colorectal polyps has received more and more attention. Aims: To validate a model based on deep learning for the automatic identification of colorectal polyps, and to analyze its auxiliary learning function for helping novice endoscopists. Methods: A total of 1 200 colonoscopy images (600 colorectal polyp images and 600 normal images) in the endoscopy center database of Qingdao Municipal Hospital (East) from January 2019 to January 2020 were retrospectively collected. Deep learning model was used to identify the 1 200 images. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and diagnosis time of deep learning model and 5 novice endoscopists for diagnosis of colorectal polyps were compared. Results: The deep learning model showed a sensitivity of 93.2%, specificity of 98.7%, accuracy of 95.9% for detecting colorectal polyps, and the diagnosis time of each image was (0.20±0.03) second. The sensitivity, accuracy, and diagnosis time of the model were superior to 5 novice endoscopists, and the specificity was superior to some novice endoscopists. The accuracies of model for polyps with size ≤5 mm and 6~9 mm were 88.1% and 96.8%, respectively, and were superior to 5 novice endoscopists; the accuracy of model for polyps with size ≥10 mm was 100%, and was similar to 5 novice endoscopists. The accuracy of model for polyps with protrude type was 94.8%, and was superior to some novice endoscopists; the accuracy of model for polyps with flat type was 91.7%, and was superior to 5 novice endoscopists. Missing the polyps with flat type (38.8%), polyps at mucosal folds (32.7%), and mistaking the mucosal folds as polyps (12.2%) were the main causes of false negative or false positive results of the model. Conclusions: The deep learning model has a high accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and shorter diagnosis time for diagnosis of colorectal polyps, and can be used to assist novice endoscopists in diagnosing small polyps and flat polyps.