Laparoscopic procedures for urological diseases in children have been proven to be safe and effective. However, the availability of laparoscopic procedures is still partly limited to experienced, high-volume centers because the procedures are technically demanding. The da Vinci robot system is being used for an increasing variety of reconstructive procedures because of the advantages of this approach, such as motion scaling, greater optical magnification, stereoscopic vision, increased instrument tip dexterity, and tremor filtration. Particularly in pediatric urologic surgery, where the operational field is limited owing to the small abdominal cavity of children, robotic surgical technology has its own strengths. Currently, robots are used to perform most surgeries in children that can be performed laparoscopically. In this review, we aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the current role of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in Pediatric Urology by analyzing the published data in this field. A growing body of evidence supports the view that robotic technology is technically feasible and safe in pediatric urological surgery. Robotic technology provides additional benefits for performing reconstructive urologic surgery, such as in pyeloplasty, ureteral reimplantation, and enterocystoplasty procedures. The main limitations to robotic surgery are its high purchase and maintenance costs and that the cost-effectiveness of this technology remains to be validated.
Child ; Humans ; Laparoscopy/*methods ; Robotic Surgical Procedures/*methods ; Urologic Diseases/*surgery ; Urologic Surgical Procedures/*methods

Minimally invasive esophagectomy for the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer has gradually been recognized and applied. With the application of robot-assisted technology in esophageal surgery, robot-assisted esophagectomy has been carried out in large domestic centers, and its feasibility and safety have been recognized by some domestic experts. In view of no advice or guidelines about robot-assisted esophagectomy has been written before, Committee of Esophageal Cancer in China Anticancer Association organized relevant domestic experts to establish this expert recommendation for standardization of robot-assisted esophagectomy, aiming at helping surgeons perform this complex procedure safely.
Esophageal Neoplasms ; surgery ; Esophagectomy ; methods ; Humans ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Robotic Surgical Procedures

No abstract available.
Evidence-Based Medicine/methods ; Humans ; Male ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods ; Prostatectomy/*methods ; Robotic Surgical Procedures/*methods

Robotic gastric cancer surgery developed rapidly in recent years and its future prospect has received continuous attention. Compared with traditional laparoscopy, robotic surgery has obvious technical advantages and superior efficacy. Although some problems and deficiencies still exist, robotic gastric cancer surgery will be further popularized with more high-quality evidence-based medicine research and the development of new domestic surgical robots, and therefore bring greater benefits for more patients. We believe that robotic gastric cancer surgery will become the mainstream of minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer.
Gastrectomy/methods* ; Humans ; Laparoscopy/methods* ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods* ; Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods* ; Stomach Neoplasms/surgery*

BACKGROUND: The KangDuo-Surgical Robot-01 (KD-SR-01) system is a new surgical robot recently developed in China. The aim of this study was to present our single-center experience and mid-term outcomes of urological procedures using the KD-SR-01 system. METHODS: From August 2020 to April 2023, consecutive urologic procedures were performed at Peking University First Hospital using the KD-SR-01 system. The clinical features, perioperative data, and follow-up outcomes were prospectively collected and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 110 consecutive patients were recruited. Among these patients, 28 underwent partial nephrectomy (PN), 41 underwent urinary tract reconstruction (26 underwent pyeloplasty, 3 underwent ureteral reconstruction and 12 underwent ureterovesical reimplantation [UR]), and 41 underwent radical prostatectomy (RP). The median operative time for PN was 112.5 min, 157.0 min for pyeloplasty, 151.0 min for ureteral reconstruction, 142.5 min for UR, and 138.0 min for RP. The median intraoperative blood loss was 10 mL for PN, 10 mL for pyeloplasty, 30 mL for ureteral reconstruction, 20 mL for UR, and 50 mL for RP. All procedures were successfully completed without conversion, and there were no major complications in any patient. The median warm ischemia time of PN was 17.3 min, and positive surgical margin was not noted in any patient. The overall positive surgical margin rate of RP was 39% (16/41), and no biochemical recurrence was observed in any RP patient during the median follow-up of 11.0 months. The surgical success rates of pyeloplasty and UR were 96% (25/26) and 92% (11/12) during the median follow-up of 29.5 months and 11.5 months, respectively. CONCLUSION The KD-SR-01 system appears feasible, safe, and effective for most urological procedures, based on our single-center experience.
Male ; Humans ; Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods* ; Robotics ; Treatment Outcome ; Retrospective Studies ; Ureter/surgery* ; Urologic Surgical Procedures/methods* ; Laparoscopy/methods*

OBJECTIVE: To study the trend of surgical type, surgical procedure and etiological distribution of upper urinary tract repair in recent 10 years. METHODS: The preoperative and perioperative variables and follow-up data of upper urinary tract reconstruction surgery in RECUTTER (Reconstruction of Urinary Tract: Technology, Epidemiology and Result) database from 2010 to 2021 were searched, collected and analyzed. The surgical type, surgical procedure, duration of hospitalization, time of operation, incidence of short-term complications, and proportion of the patients undergoing reoperations were compared between the two groups of 2010-2017 period and 2018-2021 period. RESULTS: A total of 1 072 patients were included in the RECUTTER database. Congenital factors and iatrogenic injuries were the main causes of upper urinary tract repair. Among them, 129 (12.0%) patients had open operation, 403 (37.6%) patients had laparoscopic surgery, 322 (30.0%) patients had robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery and 218 (20.3%) patients had endourological procedure. In the last decade, the total number of surgeries showed a noticeable increasing annual trend and the proportion of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in 2018-2021 was significantly higher than that in 2010-2017 (P < 0.001). The 1 072 patients included 124 (11.6%) cases of ileal ureter replacements, 440 (41.1%) cases of pyeloplasty, 229 (21.4%) cases of balloon dilation, 109 (10.2%) cases of ureteral reimplantation, 49 (4.6%) cases of boari flap-Psoas hitch surgery, 60 (5.6%) cases of uretero-ureteral anastomosis, 61 (5.7%) cases of lingual mucosal onlay graft ureteroplasty or appendiceal onlay flap ureteroplasty. Pyeloplasty and balloon dilatation had been the main types of surgery, while the proportion of lingual mucosal onlay graft ureteroplasty plus appendiceal onlay flap ureteroplasty had increased significantly in recent years (P < 0.05). In addition, the time of operation was significantly increased (P < 0.05) after 2018, which was considered to be related to the sharp increase in the proportion of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. We found that minimally invasive surgery (endourological procedure and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery) as an independent risk factor (P=0.050, OR=0.472) could reduce the incidence of short-term post-operative complications. CONCLUSION We have justified the value of the RECUTTER database, created by the Institute of Urology, Peking University in data support for clinical research work, and provided valuable experience for the construction of other multi-center databases at home and abroad. In recent 10 years, we have observed that, in upper urinary tract reconstruction surgery, the surgery type tends to be minimally invasive and the surgery procedure tends to be complicated, suggesting the superiority of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery.
Humans ; Laparoscopy/methods* ; Retrospective Studies ; Robotic Surgical Procedures ; Treatment Outcome ; Ureter/surgery* ; Ureteral Obstruction/surgery* ; Urologic Surgical Procedures/methods*

Laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer has been developed in China for more than 20 years. It has gone through the initial stage of exploration in the 1990s, the stage of learning and accumulation in the early 21st century, the stage of development and expansion in the 2010s, and the current stage of standardization, and innovation. Laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery in China has developed from less to more, from more to popular. Surgical techniques have gradually become mature, innovated, and standardized, medical evidence has accumulated, and academic exchanges have become increasingly active and valued by the world. In the future, it is expected to make new progress and breakthrough in tumor specific laparoscopic navigation surgery system, intelligent robotic gastric cancer surgery platform, functional preservation surgery for early gastric cancer under the integration of gastroenterologists and surgeons, and laparoscopic comprehensive treatment for peritoneal metastasis. By reviewing the development of laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery in China, the authors draw inspiration from the depths of history, inherit and innovate, look forward to the future, and pay tribute to the predecessors.
China ; Gastrectomy/methods* ; Humans ; Laparoscopy/methods* ; Reference Standards ; Robotic Surgical Procedures ; Stomach Neoplasms/surgery*

Humans ; Male ; Prostate/surgery* ; Prostatectomy/methods* ; Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery* ; Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods*

No abstract available.
Humans ; Laparoscopy/methods ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/*methods ; Periodicals as Topic ; Robotic Surgical Procedures/*methods ; Urolithiasis/diagnosis/therapy ; Urologic Surgical Procedures/*methods ; Urology/trends

Joint arthroplasty is an effective method for treating end-stage joint lesions and damages. Robotic arm-assisted arthroplasty, a rapidly developing technology that combines navigation technology, minimally invasive technology, and precise control technology of the robotic arm, can achieve accurate preoperative planning, optimal selection of implants, minimally invasive surgery, precise osteotomy, and accurate placement of the artificial joint. It has the characteristics of high accuracy and stability, and thus is more and more widely used in the field of joint surgery. In this paper, we systematically reviewed the application and clinical efficacy of robotic arm-assisted technology in hip and knee arthroplasty to provide reference for its future promotion.
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/methods* ; Humans ; Knee Joint/surgery* ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures ; Robotic Surgical Procedures ; Treatment Outcome