OBJECTIVE: To explore MSCT optimal examination time for patients with unconspicuous rib fracture. METHODS: Sixty-three patients with thoracic trauma from January 2009 to June 2011 were collected. They were examined by MSCT in the first week after trauma and re-examined during eighth weeks after trauma. The number of rib which had been found fractured in the first examination was compared to that in re-examinations. RESULTS: Patients with fine rib fracture often have different diagnostic results at different examination time after trauma. There was statistical difference between the number in the first week and the third week to the fifth week. CONCLUSION MSCT could show the pathophysiological changes of rib fracture objectively in the stage between the third week and the fifth week after trauma, which is optimal examination time for the fine rib fracture.
Adult ; Aged ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multidetector Computed Tomography ; Pleura/pathology* ; Radiography, Thoracic/methods* ; Rib Fractures/physiopathology* ; Thoracic Injuries/physiopathology* ; Time Factors ; Wounds, Nonpenetrating/physiopathology* ; Young Adult

OBJECTIVETo compare screw's inserting angle through the 11th and 12th rib in treating L1 burst fracture, explore effects on inserting screw and postoperative angle.

METHODSFrom October 2007 to October 2010, 108 patients with L1 brust fracture treated through anterior approach were analyzed,including 68 males and 40 females, aged from 21 to 64 years (mean 38.22 years). All patients were divided into the 11th (A, 51 cases) and 12th (B, 57 cases) approach. The data of operation time,blood loss, duration of incision pain, JOA score, Oswestry score, VAS score, quality of life (SF-36), recovery of nervous function, coronal Cobb angle, included angle between screw and plate were observed.

RESULTSAll patients were followed up for 9 to 37 months, mean 23 months. The operation time, blood loss, duration of incision pain, in group A were lower than group B (P<0.05), JOA score, Oswestry score, VAS score, SF-36, recovery of nervous function had no significant differences (P>0.05). There were no differences in Cobb angle before operation, but had significance after operation (P=0.000). There were statistically significance between two group in angle between screw and plate (P=0.000, P=0.003).

CONCLUSIONThe 11th rib approach for the treatment of L1 burst fracture has less effects on screw, less trauma and less angle between screw and plate.

Adult ; Bone Screws ; Female ; Fracture Fixation, Internal ; adverse effects ; instrumentation ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications ; Recovery of Function ; Rib Fractures ; diagnostic imaging ; physiopathology ; surgery ; Ribs ; surgery ; Spinal Cord ; physiopathology ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Young Adult