Background: The etiology of pleural effusion remains unclear in nearly 20% of cases. One way to diagnose malignancy is by doing pleural fluid cytology. There are factors that influence the yield of pleural fluid cytology and one of them is appropriate and timely fixation of samples. Currently, there is no local consensus regarding the timing with which the specimen should be fixed. Objective: The study aims to compare the yield of malignancy between early fixation versus usual fixation of pleural fluid samples, meaning there is no set time for fixation to be done. Methodology: The study employed a prospective cross-sectional research design. All patients with pleural effusion who fulfilled the criteria set by the study were included. Two sets of pleural fluid samples were collected amounting to 20cc each. First sample was assigned as Bottle #1 and placed immediately with fixative while the second sample was assigned as Bottle #2. Bottle #2 underwent routine fixation which follows no fixed or standard time of fixation. The time difference between the fixation of two sample groups greatly varied with Bottle #1 fixed immediately right after collection while Bottle#2 depends on the time it will be processed by the laboratory personnel. Both samples were submitted for cell block and cell cytology reading. Results: Characteristics of the 55 patients included in the study showed age group range from 41 to 65 years of age, with 27 male and 28 female patients. Only one third had history of smoking. There were 21.82% who had family history of cancer and with and suspicious mass on chest radiograph. Out of 55 patients, 29 patients had history of previous diagnosis of cancer, 23 had recurrent pleural effusion, and 28 had chest radiograph with suspicious nodules. Based on gross appearance, there were 20 serous and 21 sanguineous pleural fluid noted. Mean cell count was high (1,115.50 ± 741.02) with lymphocytic predominance (82.56 ± 24.46). Elevated protein concentration (5,388.25 ± 8,230.46) and LDH (484.17 ± 248.72) were noted. Glucose (8.78 ± 6.68 mmol/L) was low. There were 21 patients who had high WBC, 24 with high protein and 16 with elevated LDH. There were 3 patients who were positive for AFB and none for KOH. Comparative analysis showed that the pleural fluid samples assigned to the routinely fixed group which were handed to the nurse after thoracentesis, then forwarded to the laboratory through a ward laboratory aide or patient watcherfor fixation with with 95% alcoholby thelaboratory personnel significantly had a longer duration of 406.62 minutes as compared to immediately fixed at 12.27 minutes (P<0.01). For diagnosis of malignancy, significantly more cases were diagnosed in the immediately fixed group with 36.36% cases versus 18.18% (p=0.016). Conclusion Among patients with suspected malignant pleural effusions, early fixation of pleural fluid samples resulted in higher histopathology yields as compared to those fixed after going through the routine fixation.
Pleural Effusion, Malignant

: Contarini’s syndrome refers to the occurrence of bilateral pleural effusion which has different causes for each hemithorax. Based on extensive literature search, this is a rare finding and to date, only two published cases have recorded tuberculous effusion on one side. In this paper, the authors aim to present a case of Contarini’s syndrome, and to give emphasis that such condition with different etiologies exists and should be considered in managing bilateral effusion. : This is a case of a 69-year-old female with a 7-week history of dyspnea, 2-pillow orthopnea, fever, and right-sided chest discomfort. Patient sought consultation and was prescribed with Diclofenac and Cefalexin with no relief. Patient was then admitted and intubated due to worsening dyspnea. Patient was managed as COVID-19 confirmed critical with viral myocarditis, CAP-HR, and diabetic ketoacidosis. Initial chest x-ray showed right-sided pleural effusion. Thoracentesis was done and revealed exudative pleural fluid (PF) with WBC of 20,000 with neutrophilic predominance and negative RT-PCR MTB. Cytology revealed acute inflammatory pattern. Klebsiella pneumoniae ESBL was isolated. Antibiotics were shifted to levofloxacin and meropenem. Repeat chest x-ray showed left-sided pleural effusion. Thoracentesis was done and revealed exudative PF with WBC of 1,680 with neutrophilic predominance. No organism was isolated. RT-PCR for MTB was detected. Thus, anti-TB therapy was initiated. However, ETA TB culture showed resistance to isoniazid, rifampicin, and pyrazinamide. Patient was referred to PMDT for MDR-TB treatment. Bilateral effusion has resolved with no recurrence, and with uneventful removal of bilateral chest tubes. Patient was eventually extubated and transferred to the ward. Patient however developed HAP, was re-intubated and eventually expired due to the septic shock from VAP. This case report highlights the importance of weighing risk versus benefit in deciding to perform bilateral thoracentesis when there is a clinical suspicion of an alternate or concurrent diagnosis.
Pleural effusion ; Thoracentesis ; COVID-19

Background: COVID-19 infection poses a continuing challenge especially to those already with prior lung disease. To analyze such patients’ profile is essential in today’s health care management. Objective: The study aimed to compare the outcomes of COVID-19 confirmed patients with and without primary lung cancer in terms of hospital stay, recovery, and mortality. Methods: The study employed a retrospective cohort design. Chart review of all adult COVID-19 patients in Philippine General Hospital from January 2021 to June 2021 was done. A matched cohort study was conducted between COVID-19 patients with and without primary lung cancer. Results: Among the 953 COVID-19 patients, there were 14 patients with primary lung cancer. In terms of length of hospital stay, patients with primary lung cancer had shorter days from 1.32 to 15.1 days compared to 2.28 to 18.36 days in patients without primary lung cancer (p-value 0.271). Furthermore, they had 64% recovery rate compared to 78% in those without primary lung cancer (p-value 0.118). In terms of overall mortality rate, primary lung cancer patients had 36% rate as compared to 22% in the non-lung cancer group (p-value 0.119). Diabetes mellitus, mild to severe COVID, Remdesivir, and antibiotic use were associated with longer hospital stay while oxygen support via nasal cannula and invasive ventilation led to shorter hospital stay. Age above 50 years, chronic liver disease, other malignancy, shortness of breath, oxygen support via face mask, high flow nasal cannula, invasive ventilation, antibiotic use, hemoperfusion and nebulization showed a decrease chance of recovery while on contrary, Remdesivir showed an increase chance of recovery. An increase mortality rate was seen among age above 50 years, chronic liver disease, other malignancy, shortness of breath, oxygen support via facemask, high flow nasal cannula, invasive ventilation, antibiotics, hemoperfusion, and nebulization, in contrast to a decrease in Remdesivir therapy. Conclusions Among all admitted COVID-19 patients, primary lung cancer patients were associated with shorter hospital stay (8.21+6.89days), lower rate of recovery (64%), and higher mortality rate (36%) as compared to those without primary lung cancer. However, based on the computed p-values for each outcome, these differences are not statistically significant.
COVID-19 ; lung cancer ; lung neoplasm