1.Observing the efficacy of azelastine hydrochloride nasal spray combined with budesonide nasal spray in treating persistent allergic rhinitis
Chinese Archives of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 2017;24(4):180-183
OBJECTIVE To observe clinical efficacy of azelastine hydrochloride nasal spray plus budesonide nasal spray on persistent allergic rhinitiss(AR). METHODS 120 patients with persistent AR were devided randomly into group A(n=40), group B(n=40) and group C(n=40). Group A were treated with azelastine hydrochloride nasal spray and budesonide nasal spray, group B received only azelastine hydrochloride nasal spray and group C received budesonide nasal spray only, the treatment process were 4 weeks. Clinical efficacy were compared among 3 groups 4 weeks later. RESULTS 1. VAS scores: VAS scores of nasal symptoms in group A were lower than those both in group B and in group C after 4 weeks, the difference were statistically significant(P<0.05); 2. RQLQ scores: RQLQ scores in 3 groups were all significantly improved after 4 weeks, the RQLQ scores of sleep, nonnose/eye symptoms, nasal symptoms and emotions in group A were improved more significantly than those in group B and in group C, the difference were statistically significant(P<0.05); 3. Clinical efficacy: the significant effective rate and the total effective rate were 50.00% and 93.33% in group A, but were 30.00% and 75.00% in group B and 27.50% and 77.50% in group C, the differences between group A and group B or group A and group C were statistically significant(P <0.05). CONCLUSION Azelastine hydrochloride nasal spray plus budesonide nasal spray can rapidly relieve nasal symptoms and improve the life quality of the patients with persistent AR.
2.The Influencing Factors of Competing Sentences Test in the Normal-hearing Adults
Xiaoqin HE ; Hang ZHAO ; Qiaoyun LIU ; Ziqin ZHANG ; Changxin ZHANG ; Renxia TAO ; Kun HAN
Journal of Audiology and Speech Pathology 2017;25(5):455-459
Objective To study the influencing factors of the competing sentences test in normal-hearing adults, in order to provide references for the preparation of the competing sentences test with children and the development of the diagnostic tools of the central auditory processing disorders.Methods According to the three kinds of test tables of semantic competition, sentence constituent competition and phonetic competition for the competing sentences test, the 2×3×3 factors mixed experimental design were used to test the 48 normal-hearing adults(forty-six right-handed adults and two left-handed adults) with the competing sentences test.The correct rate was obtained and the influencing factors were analyzed.Results ①The average correct rate of the Competing Sentences Test for the forty-six right-handed normal-hearing adults was 94.98%,and for the two left-handed normal-hearing adults was 96.12%.②The right-handed subjects'' right ear accuracy rate was significantly higher than that of the left ear(P<0.01),while the accuracy rate of the left ear was obviously higher than the right ear with left-handed subjects.③The effects of genders on the results of the competing sentences test was not significant(P>0.05)with the right-handed subjects.④For the results of three types sentences,the correct rate of semantic competition was the highest, the second was the sentence constituent competition and phonetic competition was the lowest with the right-handed subjects.Conclusion No gender factors were found to affect the results of the competing sentences test among adults.The normal-hearing right-handed adults have the right ear advantage in the competing sentences test, prompting us to become concerned about the choice of the ear sides.Different competition types of sentences will have a greater impact on the difficulty of the competing sentences test, so we should pay more attention to this in the preparation of competitive sentences test tables.
3.A Review of the Relationship between Language Ability and Theory of Mind in Children with Specific Language Disorders
Yanxia WANG ; Daoli XIE ; Zongyun ZHANG ; Renxia TAO ; Qiaoyun LIU
Journal of Audiology and Speech Pathology 2024;32(2):168-171
Children with specific language impairment(SLI)have normal cognitive abilities but experience language deficits.The heterogeneity of language disorders makes SLI children optimal subjects for investigating the correlation between language ability and theory of mind.This paper provides a comprehensive review of foreign em-pirical studies examining the relationship between language ability and theory of mind in SLI groups from various perspectives.The findings indicate that specific types of language disorders exhibit delayed development in theory of mind,which is closely associated with their language ability deficits.Among all linguistic elements,syntactic de-fects demonstrate the most concentrated evidence regarding their impact on theory of mind.It is noteworthy that al-though SLI children offer valuable insights into the correlation between language and theory of mind,further investi-gation is still required to comprehensively comprehend this association.The present study also provides recommenda-tions for future research endeavors in this domain.