During the routine tests, it's found that the testing method related to Hemodialysis mentioned in the industry standard YY0598-2006 cannot reflect the real bicarbonate concentration in Hemodialysis. To discuss the reaction principle and its interference factors deeply by studying the assay determination of bicarbonate in Hemodialysis, and it could be cited as reference for amending the quality standard or troubleshooting. The improved way of determining bicarbonate concentration in Hemodialysis is also put up.
Bicarbonates ; analysis ; Dialysis Solutions ; analysis ; standards ; Renal Dialysis ; methods ; standards

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of recirculation rate according to cannulation direction and interval among hemodialysis patients with arteriovenous fistula (AVF).METHOD: The research used repeated measures design. This study was conducted among thirty patients who received hemodialysis three times a week for longer than a year through AVF at the I University hospital. Three different types of interventions were administered to the participants each week for three weeks. Needles were placed at a different distance and in a different direction each week: 7 cm apart from each other in antegrade direction during the first week, 5 cm apart in retrograde direction in the following week, and 7 cm apart in retrograde direction in the third week.RESULTS: No significant differences in the recirculation rate were found due to any of the three tested methods (p = 1.00).CONCLUSION: This finding suggests that, if the patients have well-functioned AVF, we can choose an appropriate intervention from among the three methods in consideration of the patient's diverse needs.
Arteriovenous Fistula ; Catheterization ; Humans ; Methods ; Needles ; Punctures ; Renal Dialysis

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We investigated which dialysis unit blood pressure (BP) is the most useful for predicting home BP in patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD). METHODS: Patients undergoing HD who had been treated > 3 months were included in this study. Exclusion criteria were hospitalized patients with acute illness and changes in dry weight and anti-hypertensive drugs 2 weeks before the study. We used the dialysis unit BP recording data, such as pre-HD, intra-HD, post-HD, mean pre-HD, and post-HD (pre-post-HD), mean pre-HD, intra-HD, and post-HD (pre-intra-post-HD) BP. Home BP (the same period of dialysis unit BP) was monitored as a reference method during 2 weeks using the same automatic oscillometric device. Patients were asked to record their BP three times daily (wake up, between noon and 6:00 PM, and at bedtime). RESULTS: Significant differences were detected between home systolic blood pressure (SBP) and pre-HD, post-HD, and intra-HD SBP (p = 0.003, p = 0.001, p = 0.016, respectively). In contrast, no differences were observed between home SBP and pre-intra-post-HD and pre-post-HD SBP (p = 0.235, p = 0.307, respectively). Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for pre-intra-post-HD and prepost-HD SBP with 2-week home BP as the reference standard were 0.812 and 0.801, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that pre-intra-post-HD and pre-post-HD SBP had similar accuracy for predicting mean 2-week home SBP in HD patients. Therefore, pre-intra-post-HD and pre-post-HD SBP should be useful for predicting home SBP in HD patients if ambulatory or home BP measurements are unavailable.
Antihypertensive Agents ; Blood Pressure* ; Dialysis* ; Hemodialysis Units, Hospital ; Humans ; Hypertension ; Methods ; Renal Dialysis* ; ROC Curve

The therapeutic technique of hemodialysis and the concept of clearance have both followed a long but instructive course of development. In addition, it recently has been shown that physiological changes occurring during hemodialysis have important clinical consequences both in the treatment of drug toxicity and in the selection of appropriate replacement doses of therapeutic drugs. Two major approaches for calculating hemodialysis clearance are currently used. The first approach, termed the recovery method is the “gold standard” that is recommended for use in the current US FDA draft guidance on the conduct of pharmacokinetic studies in patients with impaired renal function. The second approach, termed the A-V difference method, is used more commonly. Unfortunately, this method results in erroneous plasma clearance estimates when improper values for dialyzer flow are chosen. This constitutes a major pitfall that should be avoided in future studies.
Dialysis* ; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions ; Humans ; Methods ; Plasma ; Renal Dialysis*

INTRODUCTION: In patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) suitable for peritoneal dialysis (PD), PD should ideally be planned and initiated electively (planned-start PD). If patients present late, some centres initiate PD immediately with an urgent-start PD strategy. However, as urgent-start PD is resource intensive, we evaluated another strategy where patients first undergo emergent haemodialysis (HD), followed by early PD catheter insertion, and switch to PD 48-72 hours after PD catheter insertion (early-start PD). Conventionally, late-presenting patients are often started on HD, followed by deferred PD catheter insertion before switching to PD≥14 days after catheter insertion (deferred start PD). METHODS: This is a retrospective study of new ESKD patients, comparing the planned-start, early-start and deferred-start PD strategies. Outcomes within 1 year of dialysis initiation were studied. RESULTS: Of 148 patients, 57 (38.5%) patients had planned-start, 23 (15.5%) early-start and 68 (45.9%) deferred-start PD. Baseline biochemical parameters were similar except for a lower serum urea with planned-start PD. No significant differences were seen in the primary outcomes of technique and patient survival across all 3 subgroups. Compared to planned-start PD, early-start PD had a shorter time to catheter migration (hazard ratio [HR] 14.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.65-121.04, P=0.016) while deferred-start PD has a shorter time to first peritonitis (HR 2.49, 95% CI 1.03-6.01, P=0.043) and first hospital admission (HR 2.03, 95% CI 1.35-3.07, P=0.001). CONCLUSION Planned-start PD is the best PD initiation strategy. However, if this is not possible, early-start PD is a viable alternative. Catheter migration may be more frequent with early-start PD but does not appear to impact technique survival.
Female ; Humans ; Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy* ; Male ; Peritoneal Dialysis/methods* ; Renal Dialysis ; Retrospective Studies ; Time Factors

Drugs, Chinese Herbal ; Humans ; Medicine, Chinese Traditional ; methods ; Renal Dialysis ; methods

OBJECTIVEContinuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is a continuous process of bedside blood purification which is widely used in the treatment of acute kidney injury (AKI) and for fluid management. However, since AKI and fluid overload are often found to be associated with hemodynamic abnormalities, determining the relationship between CRRT and hemodynamics remains a challenge in the treatment of critically ill patients. The aim of this review was to summarize key points in the relationship between CRRT and hemodynamics and to understand and monitor renal hemodynamics in critically ill patients, especially those with AKI.

DATA SOURCESThis review was based on data in articles published in the PubMed databases up to January 30, 2017, with the following keywords: "continuous renal replacement therapy," "Hemodynamics," and "Acute kidney injury."

STUDY SELECTIONOriginal articles and critical reviews on CRRT were selected for this review.

RESULTSCRRT might treat AKI by hemodynamic therapy, and it was an important form of hemodynamic therapy. The targets of hemodynamic therapy should be established when using CRRT. Therefore, hemodynamic management and stability were very important during CRRT. Most studies suggested that renal hemodynamics should be clearly identified.

CONCLUSIONSCRRT is not only a replacement for organ function, but an important form of hemodynamic therapy. Improved hemodynamic management of critically ill patients can be achieved by establishing specific therapeutic hemodynamic targets and maintaining circulatory stability during CRRT. Over the long term, observation of renal hemodynamics will provide greater opportunities for the progression of CRRT hemodynamic therapy.

Acute Kidney Injury ; physiopathology ; therapy ; Animals ; Female ; Hemodynamics ; physiology ; Humans ; Male ; Renal Dialysis ; methods ; Renal Replacement Therapy ; methods

Adequate fluid management is an important therapeutic goal of dialysis. Recently, bioelectrical impedance methods have been used to determine body fluid status, but pediatric reports are rare. To determine the accuracy of bioelectrical impedance methods in the assessment of body fluid statusof children undergoing hemodialysis (HD), 12 children on HD were studied. A multi-frequency bioimpedance analysis device (Inbody S10) and bioimpedance spectroscopy device (BCM) were used to evaluate fluid status. Fluid removal during a HD session (assessed as body-weight change, ΔBWt) was compared with the difference in total body water determined by each device (measured fluid difference, ΔMF), which showed strong correlation using either method (Pearson's coefficient, r = 0.772 with Inbody S10 vs. 0.799 with BCM). Bioimpedance measurement indicated fluid overload (FO; ΔHS greater than 7%) in 34.8% with Inbody S10 and 56.5% with BCM, and only about 60% of children with FO by bioimpedance methods showed clinical symptoms such as hypertension and edema. In some patients with larger weight gain Inbody S10-assessed overhydration (OH) was much smaller than BCM-assessed OH, suggesting that BCM is more relevant in estimating fluid accumulation amount than Inbody S10. To our knowledge, this is the first report on the use of body composition monitors to assess fluid status in Korean children receiving HD.
Body Composition ; Body Fluids ; Body Water ; Child ; Dialysis ; Edema ; Electric Impedance ; Humans ; Hypertension ; Methods* ; Renal Dialysis* ; Spectrum Analysis ; Weight Gain

PURPOSE: This study was a cross-sectional study comparing differences in self-management knowledge, self-management, physiologic indexes, and symptoms experience for two methods of dialysis. METHODS: Participants were 90 patients on hemodialysis and 91 on peritoneal dialysis at A hospital. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the two groups for knowledge of self-management. A comparison of the categories in the evaluation of self-management showed that patients in the peritoneal dialysis group took better care of their dialysis access route (F=17.61, p < .001) and dialysis schedule (F=4.30, p=.040). The physiologic indexes between the two dialysis groups showed that hemoglobin levels were higher in the hemodialysis group (F=5.28, p=.023). The product of serum calcium and phosphate was higher in the peritoneal dialysis group (F=11.42, p=.001). Serum sodium level was also higher in the peritoneal dialysis group (t=5.36, p < .001) while serum albumin level (t=−3.36, p=.001) and mean arterial blood pressure (t=−2.50, p=.013) were higher in hemodialysis patients. There were no significant differences in the proportion of uncomfortable experiences between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Medical personnel should consider differences in self-management knowledge/self-management, physiologic indexes, and symptoms experience for hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis populations, and should provide adequate education accordingly and promote behavioral change to improve physiologic indexes and reduce symptoms.
Appointments and Schedules ; Arterial Pressure ; Biomarkers ; Calcium ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Dialysis* ; Education ; Humans ; Methods* ; Peritoneal Dialysis ; Renal Dialysis ; Self Care* ; Serum Albumin ; Sodium ; Symptom Assessment

PURPOSE: Thirst has been reported as an important source of distress for patients on hemodialysis. However, there is no instrument available that assesses thirst distress of Turkish patients on hemodialysis. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Thirst Distress Scale (TDS-T) for patients on hemodialysis. METHODS: This study was conducted methodologically. A convenience sample of 142 Turkish patients on hemodialysis participated in this study. Data were collected by using a questionnaire, the TDS-T and a visual analogue scale for thirst intensity. The analysis of data included descriptive statistics, the one-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Kruskal-Wallis test, Mann-Whitney U test, correlation coefficients and psychometric tests. RESULTS: The TDS-T demonstrated acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficient = .81), good test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = .88), and correlations with interdialytic weight gain values and thirst intensity scores (measured by visual analogue scale) indicating concurrent and convergent validity, respectively. Construct validity was supported by known-group comparisons. The results revealed a one-component structure of the instrument. CONCLUSIONS: The psychometric properties of the TDS-T were consistent with those reported in the original study. The TDS-T was found to be a valid and reliable tool for evaluating thirst distress in patients on hemodialysis.
Humans ; Methods ; Psychometrics ; Renal Dialysis* ; Reproducibility of Results* ; Thirst* ; Turkey ; Weight Gain ; Surveys and Questionnaires