1.Investigation of the Location of the Ureteral Stone and Diameter of the Ureter in Patients with Renal Colic.
Ha Jong SONG ; Sung Tae CHO ; Ki Kyung KIM
Korean Journal of Urology 2010;51(3):198-201
PURPOSE: The objective of this study were to evaluate the location of ureteral stones and the diameter of the ureter in patients with renal colic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 95 consecutive patients who presented to the emergency department with renal colic in whom urinary stones were diagnosed by computed tomography between January 2009 and August 2009. The size and location of the stones were investigated. The length and diameter of unaffected ureters were also measured. RESULTS: The mean size of the stones was 4.87+/-3.49 mm (range, 0.9-22 mm). Stones were located at ureterovesical junction (UVJ) in 44 cases (46.3%), proximal ureter in 29 (30.5%), distal ureter in 16 (16.8%), ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) in 5 (5.2%), and the ureter crossing external iliac vessel (UEIV) in 1 case (1%). The mean length of the ureter was 226.8+/-20.8 mm (range, 175-286 mm). The mean diameter of the ureter was 3.40+/-0.61 mm (range, 1.9-5.3 mm). The mean diameter of the UEIV was 3.28+/-0.59 mm (range, 2.2-5.3 mm). CONCLUSIONS: The UPJ and UEIV were not common sites of ureteral stones. The smaller the stones, the closer to the UVJ that the stones were located. Spontaneous passage of the stones was most frequently observed for stones in the UVJ. The UEIV was not significantly narrower than the other parts of the ureter.
Colic
;
Emergencies
;
Glycosaminoglycans
;
Humans
;
Renal Colic
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Ureter
;
Ureteral Calculi
;
Urinary Calculi
2.The Effect of Tamsulosin on Expulsion of Ureteral Stones after Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy.
Tae Heung KIM ; Seung Young OH ; Young Tae MOON
Korean Journal of Urology 2008;49(12):1100-1104
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of tamsulosin on expulsion of ureteral stones after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-six patients(39 with upper ureteral stones and 37 with lower ureteral stones) treated with ESWL for stones <10mm were randomly divided into two groups. Tamsulosin(0.2mg orally once daily) was administered to group 1; group 2 received no medications. All patients were evaluated with respect to the number of episodes of ureteral colic, the expulsion rates of stones after ESWL, and the mean number of sessions of ESWL until complete expulsion of stones. RESULTS: The complete expulsion rates of upper and lower ureteral stones did not differ significantly between groups 1 and 2 during each session of ESWL; however, the mean session of ESWL was lower in group 1 than in group 2. For upper ureteral stones, 1.8 sessions were necessary per patient in group 1, while 2.3 sessions were required for the patients in group 2(p=0.039). For lower ureteral stones, 2.0 sessions were necessary per patient in group 1, while 2.9 sessions were required for the patients in group 2(p=0.032). There were significant decreases in the number of episodes of pain in group 1 with lower ureteral stones(p=0.014). There were no side effects associated with tamsulosin. CONCLUSIONS: The use of tamsulosin in the treatment of upper and lower ureteral stones after ESWL can decrease the mean number of sessions of ESWL and the number of episodes of pain, but cannot improve the expulsion rate. Further research regarding the cost-effectiveness of tamsulosin after ESWL is needed.
Calculi
;
Humans
;
Lithotripsy
;
Renal Colic
;
Shock
;
Sulfonamides
;
Ureter
3.Clinical Experience of Shock Wave Lithotripsy Using the Genostone 190 Lithotriptor.
Woen Ho CHOI ; Hae Young PARK ; Tchun Yong LEE
Korean Journal of Urology 1998;39(11):1087-1092
PURPOSE: The authors evaluated of the efficacy of Genestone 190 lithotriptor (Genemed company) for the treatment of the patients with urinary calculi. MATERIALS AND METHOD: From August, 1995 to February, 1997, Seventy patients with venal stones and 103 patients with ureteral stones underwent SWL using fluoroscopy targeting, under intramuscular analgesics. Characteristics of site and size of stones, number of SWL sessions according to the size of stones, success rate according to site or size of stones, and their complications were analysed. RESULTS: The cumulative stone-free rates of first, second, and third SWL session of renal stones were 47%, 74%, and 86% and the cumulative stone-free rates of ureter stones were 65%, 79%, and 87% respectively. As the size of urinary calculi increased, the numbers of SWL sessions increased, but, the success rates were reduced. Success rate of calyx stone was lower than that of pelvis and multiple stone. Post-SWL complications were transient gross hematuria in 161 cases, steinstrasse in 18 cases, renal colic in 15 cases, and fever in one case. CONCLUSIONS: SWL monotherapy with Genestone 190 lithotriptor is a effective, safe and useful treatment modality which can resolve almost all cases of urinary calculi without any clinically significant complications.
Analgesics
;
Fever
;
Fluoroscopy
;
Hematuria
;
Humans
;
Lithotripsy*
;
Pelvis
;
Renal Colic
;
Shock*
;
Ureter
;
Urinary Calculi
4.Hematuria Testing in Patients with Suspected Urinary Stone Disease: Correlation with Contrast Enhanced Multidetector Computed Tomography Results.
Tae Hun KIM ; Seung Pill CHOI ; Sang Hoon OH ; Jung Hee WEE ; Jeong Ho PARK ; Soo Hyun KIM
Journal of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine 2011;22(5):508-516
PURPOSE: Our aim was to determine the efficacy of hematuria testing in suspected urinary stone disease using contrast enhanced multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) as the reference standard. METHODS: Records of all patients who presented to the emergency department with suspicion of urinary stone that undergone MDCT during a 2-year period were reviewed. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the positive hematuria on the urinalysis for renal colic were calculated. The rates of incidence of negative hematuria were obtained. In addition, significant alternative CT findings requiring immediate or deferred treatment were classified. RESULTS: A total of 492 enhanced MDCTs were performed. Urinary stone had been identified in 414(84.1%) of the 492 patients, and 78 patients had a negative stone, including 33 (6.7%) with clinically significant alternative diagnoses in the latter group. Microscopic urinalysis had a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 89.4%, 41.1, 88.9%, and 42.1%, respectively. The combination of microscopic urinalysis and Urine Dipstick test (UDT) yielded a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 96.9%, 28.2%, 87.5%, 62.9%, respectively. The incidence of negative hematuria for microscopic urinalysis, UDT, and the combination were 10.6%, 4.4%, 3.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The presence or absence of blood on urinalysis alone cannot be used to reliably determine which patients actually have urinary stone. Therefore, patients presenting with an episode of clinically suspected urinary stone should undergo CT scanning because it enhances diagnostic certainty by identifying alternative significant diagnoses not suspected on clinical grounds alone.
Emergencies
;
Hematuria
;
Humans
;
Incidence
;
Multidetector Computed Tomography
;
Renal Colic
;
Sensitivity and Specificity
;
Urinalysis
;
Urinary Calculi
;
Urolithiasis
5.Management of Ureteral Stones.
Korean Journal of Urology 1982;23(2):155-159
During 5 years, from January 1976 to December 1980, clinical observation on management of ureteral stones was made on 169 admitted patients with ureter stones. Following results were obtained. 1) Among total 1054 in-patients, 169 cases (16.0%) had ureteral stones, and male to female ratio was 2 : 1. 2) Patients with 20-40 of his age was half. 3) On seasonal distribution, it was most prevalent on Summer. 4) 113 cases were located on lower ureter, and laterality was even. 5) Most common symptoms were renal colic and hematuria (91.8%) 6) Ureterolithotomy was done in 127 cases. In 86 cases of lower ureter stones, less than 1cm in size. conservative fluid therapy and cystoscopic extraction was successful in 44 cases. 7) Post-operative complications were urinary leaking (16 cages), wound infection(12 cases), hematuria (3 cases), ureteral stricture (1 case), and pyelonephritis (1 case).
Constriction, Pathologic
;
Female
;
Fluid Therapy
;
Hematuria
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Pyelonephritis
;
Renal Colic
;
Seasons
;
Ureter*
;
Wounds and Injuries
6.Clinical Experience of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Urinary Calculi.
Jae Young YOON ; Jeong Hoon LEE ; Tae Kon HWANG ; Yong Hyun PARK
Korean Journal of Urology 1989;30(1):35-40
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is a non-contact, non-invasive technique for disintegrating urinary tract calculi into sand-sized particles which can be passed spontaneously by a patient during normal urine flow. ESWL with an Edap lithotriptor which uses piezoelectric elements, was performed in 465 cases with urinary calculi from May 1987 to October 1988. The overall success rate of ESWL in 465 cases was 92.7% and renal stones were more successfully (95.9%) treated than ureteral stone (86.7%) main complications of ESWL for urinary calculi were hematuria (70.8%), hypertension(8.0 %). renal colic (2.6%), ileus (2.5%) and fever (1.2%) and then they were controlled without specific treatment. ESWL using ultrasonic localization was effective for treatment of the urinary stones.
Calculi
;
Fever
;
Hematuria
;
Humans
;
Ileus
;
Lithotripsy*
;
Renal Colic
;
Shock*
;
Ultrasonics
;
Ureter
;
Urinary Calculi*
;
Urinary Tract
7.Efficacy of Diclofenac versus Caroverine in the ED Treatment of Acute Ureteral Colic.
Kwang Jung LEE ; Sung Eun KIM ; Young Jin CHEON
Journal of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine 2001;12(4):426-432
BACKGROUND: Ureteral colic due to acute obstruction of urine flow is a frequent and painful condition presenting in the emergency department. Proper control of ureteral colic is important in the management of such a patient. Many drugs, including narcotics, had been used to control ureteral colic, and of them, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are most commonly used. This study was carried out to compare the analgesic effect of diclofenac with that of caroverine which is used empirically in ureteral colic. METHODS: We carried out a randomized, prospective clinical trial in the emergency department of a university hospital. Sixty patients in whom ureteral colic had been diagnosed on the basis of physical signs and symptoms were included in this study. Each patients received an IM dose of diclofenac 75 mg, a IV bolus dose of caroverine 20 mg, or a continuous infusion of caroverine 60 mg. An additional dose of medication was added 20 min after the initial medication if needed. RESULTS: The main outcome was measured by using both the visual analogue scale(VAS), four-point categorial pain scale at times of 20, 40, and 60 min after initial medication. The requirement for supplemental medication was also measured. At 40 min, diclofenac was more effective than the other two treatments according to its pain- relieving capacity(p<0.05) and the categorial pain scale. By 60 min, caroverine continuous infusion was less effective than the other two treatments according to visual analogue scale(VAS) and the categorial pain scale(p<0.05). There were no significant differences between the diclofenac group and the caroverine bolus injection group at this time. The diclofenac group needed significantly less rescue medication for pain control(p<0.05). CONCLUSION: IM diclofenac, a non-steroidal antiinflammatory drug, was superior to the spasmolytics, single bolus or continuous intravenous infused, in treatment of ureteral colic.
Diclofenac*
;
Emergency Service, Hospital
;
Humans
;
Narcotics
;
Parasympatholytics
;
Prospective Studies
;
Renal Colic*
;
Ureter*
8.Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Experience with Domestic SDS-5000 in 173 Patients with 195 Urinary Calculi.
Won Ho KIM ; Byung Kyu JEUN ; Kyung Jun OH
Korean Journal of Urology 1999;40(12):1592-1596
PURPOSE: This study was performed to evaluate the success rate, failure causes, complications, safety and effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy(SWL) with domestic SDS-5000 lithotriptor for the treatment of urinary calculi. MATERIALS AND METHODS: SWL monotherapy using the Domestic SDS-5000 lithotripter was performed in 195 urinary stones from 173 patients between 9 years and 74 years old from March 1998 to February 1999. Distribution of stones, location and size of stones, session, success rate, causes of failure and complications of SWL were reviewed. RESULTS: Of 195 cases, 88(45.1%) had renal, and 107(54.9%) ureteral stones. Of these cases 44.6% had stones smaller than 0.9cm, 33.3% from 1 to 1.9cm, 15.9% from 2 to 2.9cm, and 4% larger than 3cm. The overall success rate of complete SWL was 91.3% with 90.1% in 5-9mm, 96.9% in 10-19mm, 90.3% in 20-29mm and 62.5% over 30mm stone size. There were no significant complications. The cases of transient gross hematuria were developed in 11.3%, renal colic in 8.7%, steinstrasse in 2.0% and fever in 1.0%. These complications were controlled with conservative treatment or repeated session of shock wave lithotripsy, Double - J stent insertion. CONCLUSIONS: SWL with Domestic SDS-5000 lithotriptor is considered to be a safe and efficient outpatient procedure for the initial treatment of urinary stone.
Aged
;
Fever
;
Hematuria
;
Humans
;
Lithotripsy*
;
Outpatients
;
Renal Colic
;
Shock*
;
Stents
;
Ureter
;
Urinary Calculi*
9.Clinical Experience of Domestic SDS-2 Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotriptor (ESWL) for 315 Urinary Calculi.
Ki Woon SON ; Mun Gab SON ; Sang Ik LEE ; Hyeon Soo KIM ; Tae Hee OH ; Hee Young SHIM
Korean Journal of Urology 1996;37(5):553-558
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotheraphy was performed in 315 urinary stones from 278 patients with the Domestic SDS-2 lithotriptor using C-arm fluoroscopy between December 1991 and December 1994. Of 315 cases, renal stones were 150 cases(47.6%) and ureteral stones 165 cases(36.1%). No regional or general anesthesia was required but parenteral or oral analgesics were required in some patients. Among 315 cases who completed extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, the overall success rate of treatment was 90.5% with 92.4% in 5-9 mm, 94.8% in 10-19 mm, 89.7% in 20-29 mm and 61.5% over 30 mm or staghorn stones. Post lithotripsy complications were transient gross hematuria in 17.1%, renal colic in 11.4%, steinstrasse in 4.8%, petechia in 2.9% and fever in 1.9% and these complications were controlled with conservative treatment or repeated session of extracorporeal shock wave lothotropsy, percutaneous nephrodtomy, Double-J stent insertion or ureterolithotomy. We suggest that extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotheraphy with the Domestic SDS-2 lithotriptor was considered to be effective and safe procedure for the initial treatment of urinary stones.
Analgesics
;
Anesthesia, General
;
Fever
;
Fluoroscopy
;
Hematuria
;
Humans
;
Lithotripsy
;
Renal Colic
;
Shock*
;
Stents
;
Ureter
;
Urinary Calculi*
10.Central Lucency of Pelvic Phleboliths: Comparison of Plain Radiographs and Noncontrast Helical CT.
Journal of the Korean Radiological Society 2000;43(1):81-85
PURPOSE: Central lucency of pelvic phleboliths is frequently observed on plain pelvic radiographs. When it is also present on noncontrast helical CT images, pelvic phleboliths may be easily diagnosed, with no suspicion of distal ureteral calculi. The objective of this study was to determine the frequency with which this phenome-non is seen on plain radiographs and noncontrast helical CT images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During a recent two-year period we identified 70 patients with renal colic who under-went both abdomino-pelvic radiography and noncontrast helical CT scanning. Radiographs were obtained at 70 -85 kVp and 30 -40 mA; CT scans were preformed within one month of plain radiography with parameters of 120 kVp, 200 -220 mA, 5-mm collimation, and pitch of 1 -1.6, and using soft tissue and bone window settings. With regared to the central lucency of pelvic phleboliths, as seen on both on radiographs and CT im-ages, two experienced radiologists reached a consensus. RESULTS: Among the 70 patients, a total of 150 pelvic phleboliths was found. In all cases except one, pelvic radi-ography and noncontrast helical CT revealed the same number of phleboliths. The exception was a case in which one of two phleboliths demonstrated by CT was not seen on radiographs. Pelvic radiography revealed central lucency in 95 of these 150 phleboliths (63%), but noncontrast helical CT failed to depict a hypodense center in any phlebolith. CONCLUSION: Central lucency of pelvic phleboliths, as frequently seen on plain pelvic radiographs, was not revealed by routine noncontrast helical CT in any patient.The presence or absence of central lucency on these CT images cannot, therefore, be used to differentiate phleboliths from distal ureteral calculi.
Consensus
;
Humans
;
Radiography
;
Renal Colic
;
Tomography, Spiral Computed*
;
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
;
Ureteral Calculi