1.A Case of Acupuncture, Moxibustion and Kampo Medicine Therapy for Right Pelvic Bone Pain Caused by Renal Cell Carcinoma Metastasis
Rei MISHIMA ; Keiko OGAWA ; Junsuke ARIMITSU ; Masaki TSUDA
Kampo Medicine 2017;68(1):29-33
Patients with the best supportive care often get worse and worse, and it is very difficult to improve their symptoms. As cancer is currently a leading cause of death in Japan, and adequate control of the cancer-associated pain is important to improve the quality of life (QOL) in cancer patients. Pain caused by bone metastasis is particularly difficult to control, and the strong analgesic medication which it requires is generally difficult to control. Such metastases result in reduced mobility and markedly reduced activities of daily living (ADL) and the QOL of patients. Our patient was a 67-year-old man who had been treated for metastasis from the left kidney to cancer of the right pelvic bone ; palliative chemotherapy and mild treatment were provided for his sharp pain, but control of his sharp pain was insufficient. Here we expand on our experience in a patient with bone metastasis caused by renal cell carcinoma successfully treated with Kampo medicine, using acupuncture and decoction extract.
2.Adipose tissues differentiated by adipose-derived stem cells harvested from transgenic mice.
Feng LU ; Jian-hua GAO ; Rei OGAWA ; Hiroshi MIZURO ; Hiki HYKUSOKU
Chinese Journal of Traumatology 2006;9(6):359-364
OBJECTIVETo induce adipocyte differentiation in vitro by adipose-derived stromal cells (ASCs) harvested from transgenic mice with green fluorescent protein (GFP)and assess the possibility of constructing adipose tissues via attachment of ASCs to type I collagen scaffolds.
METHODSInguinal fat pads from GFP transgenic mice were digested by enzymes for isolation of ASCs (primary culture). After expansion to three passages of ASCs, the cells were incubated in an adipogenic medium for two weeks, and the adipocyte differentiation by ASCs in vitro was assessed by morphological observation and Oil Red O staining. Then they were attached to collagen scaffolds and co-cultured for 12 hours, followed by hypodermic implantation to the dorsal skin of nude mice for 2 months. The newly-formed tissues were detected by HE staining.
RESULTSThe cultured primary stem cells were fibroblast-like and showed active proliferation. After being incubated in an adipocyte differentiation medium, the lipid droplets in the cytoplasm accumulated gradually and finally developed into mature adipocytes, which showed positive in Oil Red O staining. A 0.5-cm3 new tissue clot was found under the dorsal skin of the nude mice and it was confirmed as mature adipose tissues by fluorescent observation and HE staining.
CONCLUSIONSASCs can successfully differentiate adipose tissues into mature adipocytes, which exhibit an adipocyte-like morphology and express as intracytoplasmic lipid droplets. It is an efficient model of adipose tissues engineered with ASCs and type I collagen scaffolds.
Adipogenesis ; Adipose Tissue ; cytology ; Animals ; Cell Separation ; Cells, Cultured ; Female ; Male ; Mice ; Mice, Inbred BALB C ; Mice, Transgenic ; Stem Cells ; cytology ; Stromal Cells ; cytology ; Tissue Engineering ; methods
3.Experimental study of adipose tissue differentiation using adipose-derived stem cells harvested from GFP transgenic mice.
Feng LU ; Jian-hua GAO ; Hiroshi MIZURO ; Rei OGAWA ; Hiko HYAKUSOKU
Chinese Journal of Plastic Surgery 2007;23(5):412-416
OBJECTIVETo identify the expression of protein which is characteristic of stem cell, induce the adipogenic differentiation in vitro by ASCs harvested from GFP transgenic mice, and to assess the possibility of constructing adipose tissue via the attachment of ASCs to type I collagen scaffold.
METHODSInguinal fat pads from GFP transgenic mice were used for the isolation of ASCs. Expression of CD29, CD34, CD45, CD133 and HLA-DR were detected by flow cytometry. After expansion to three passages, the ASCs were incubated in an adipogenic medium for two weeks. Then they were attached to collagen I scaffold and co-cultured for 12 hours, followed by transplantation under the dorsal skin of athymic mice for 2 months. Adipogenic differentiation of ASCs in vitro was assessed by morphological observation, Oil red O staining and newly formed tissue was detected by HE staining.
RESULTSThe cultured stem cells were fibroblast-like cells and showed highly homogeneous appearance with active proliferation capacity. Stem cells' characteristic CD expression was proved. After being incubated in an adipogenic medium, they could differentiate into mature adipocytes. Accumulation of lipid droplets in the cytoplasm was testified by Oil red O staining, morphological and biological observation. 0.5 ml new tissue was formed and was confirmed by fluorescent observation and HE staining to be mature adipose tissue.
CONCLUSIONSAdipose derived stem cells can successfully differentiate into mature adipocytes exhibiting an adipose-like morphology and expression of intracytoplasmic lipid droplet. It was an efficient model for adipose tissue engineering with ASCs and type I collagen scaffold.
Adipocytes ; cytology ; Adipose Tissue ; cytology ; Animals ; Cell Culture Techniques ; Cell Differentiation ; Cells, Cultured ; Female ; Male ; Mice ; Mice, Inbred BALB C ; Mice, Transgenic ; Stem Cells ; cytology ; Tissue Engineering ; methods
4.Characteristics of Metachronous Remnant Gastric Cancer After Proximal Gastrectomy: A Retrospective Analysis
Kenichi ISHIZU ; Tsutomu HAYASHI ; Rei OGAWA ; Masashi NISHINO ; Ryota SAKON ; Takeyuki WADA ; Sho OTSUKI ; Yukinori YAMAGATA ; Hitoshi KATAI ; Yoshiyuki MATSUI ; Takaki YOSHIKAWA
Journal of Gastric Cancer 2024;24(3):280-290
Purpose:
Despite annual endoscopy, patients with metachronous remnant gastric cancer (MRGC) following proximal gastrectomy (PG) are at times ineligible for endoscopic resection (ER). This study aimed to clarify the clinical risk factors for ER inapplicability.
Materials and Methods:
We reviewed the records of 203 patients who underwent PG for cT1 gastric cancer between 2006 and 2015. The remnant stomach was categorized as a pseudofornix, corpus, or antrum.
Results:
Thirty-two MRGCs were identified in the 29 patients. Twenty MRGCs were classified as ER (ER group, 62.5%), whereas 12 were not (non-ER group, 37.5%). MRGCs were located in the pseudo-fornix in 1, corpus in 5, and antrum in 14 in the ER group, and in the pseudofornix in 6, corpus in 4, and antrum in 2 in the non-ER group (P=0.019). Multivariate analysis revealed that the pseudo-fornix was an independent risk factor for non-ER (P=0.014). In the non-ER group, MRGCs at the pseudo-fornix (n=6) had more frequent undifferentiated-type histology (4/6 vs. 0/6), deeper (≥pT1b2; 6/6 vs. 2/6) and nodal metastasis (3/6 vs. 0/6) than non-pseudo-fornix lesions (n=6). We examined the visibility of the region developing MRGC on an annual follow-up endoscopy one year before MRGC detection. In seven lesions at the pseudofornix, visibility was only secured in two (28.6%) because of food residues. Of the 25 lesions in the non-pseudo-fornix, visibility was secured in 21 lesions (84%; P=0.010).
Conclusions
Endoscopic visibility increases the chances of ER applicability. Special preparation is required to ensure the complete clearance of food residues in the pseudo-fornix.
5.Characteristics of Metachronous Remnant Gastric Cancer After Proximal Gastrectomy: A Retrospective Analysis
Kenichi ISHIZU ; Tsutomu HAYASHI ; Rei OGAWA ; Masashi NISHINO ; Ryota SAKON ; Takeyuki WADA ; Sho OTSUKI ; Yukinori YAMAGATA ; Hitoshi KATAI ; Yoshiyuki MATSUI ; Takaki YOSHIKAWA
Journal of Gastric Cancer 2024;24(3):280-290
Purpose:
Despite annual endoscopy, patients with metachronous remnant gastric cancer (MRGC) following proximal gastrectomy (PG) are at times ineligible for endoscopic resection (ER). This study aimed to clarify the clinical risk factors for ER inapplicability.
Materials and Methods:
We reviewed the records of 203 patients who underwent PG for cT1 gastric cancer between 2006 and 2015. The remnant stomach was categorized as a pseudofornix, corpus, or antrum.
Results:
Thirty-two MRGCs were identified in the 29 patients. Twenty MRGCs were classified as ER (ER group, 62.5%), whereas 12 were not (non-ER group, 37.5%). MRGCs were located in the pseudo-fornix in 1, corpus in 5, and antrum in 14 in the ER group, and in the pseudofornix in 6, corpus in 4, and antrum in 2 in the non-ER group (P=0.019). Multivariate analysis revealed that the pseudo-fornix was an independent risk factor for non-ER (P=0.014). In the non-ER group, MRGCs at the pseudo-fornix (n=6) had more frequent undifferentiated-type histology (4/6 vs. 0/6), deeper (≥pT1b2; 6/6 vs. 2/6) and nodal metastasis (3/6 vs. 0/6) than non-pseudo-fornix lesions (n=6). We examined the visibility of the region developing MRGC on an annual follow-up endoscopy one year before MRGC detection. In seven lesions at the pseudofornix, visibility was only secured in two (28.6%) because of food residues. Of the 25 lesions in the non-pseudo-fornix, visibility was secured in 21 lesions (84%; P=0.010).
Conclusions
Endoscopic visibility increases the chances of ER applicability. Special preparation is required to ensure the complete clearance of food residues in the pseudo-fornix.
6.Characteristics of Metachronous Remnant Gastric Cancer After Proximal Gastrectomy: A Retrospective Analysis
Kenichi ISHIZU ; Tsutomu HAYASHI ; Rei OGAWA ; Masashi NISHINO ; Ryota SAKON ; Takeyuki WADA ; Sho OTSUKI ; Yukinori YAMAGATA ; Hitoshi KATAI ; Yoshiyuki MATSUI ; Takaki YOSHIKAWA
Journal of Gastric Cancer 2024;24(3):280-290
Purpose:
Despite annual endoscopy, patients with metachronous remnant gastric cancer (MRGC) following proximal gastrectomy (PG) are at times ineligible for endoscopic resection (ER). This study aimed to clarify the clinical risk factors for ER inapplicability.
Materials and Methods:
We reviewed the records of 203 patients who underwent PG for cT1 gastric cancer between 2006 and 2015. The remnant stomach was categorized as a pseudofornix, corpus, or antrum.
Results:
Thirty-two MRGCs were identified in the 29 patients. Twenty MRGCs were classified as ER (ER group, 62.5%), whereas 12 were not (non-ER group, 37.5%). MRGCs were located in the pseudo-fornix in 1, corpus in 5, and antrum in 14 in the ER group, and in the pseudofornix in 6, corpus in 4, and antrum in 2 in the non-ER group (P=0.019). Multivariate analysis revealed that the pseudo-fornix was an independent risk factor for non-ER (P=0.014). In the non-ER group, MRGCs at the pseudo-fornix (n=6) had more frequent undifferentiated-type histology (4/6 vs. 0/6), deeper (≥pT1b2; 6/6 vs. 2/6) and nodal metastasis (3/6 vs. 0/6) than non-pseudo-fornix lesions (n=6). We examined the visibility of the region developing MRGC on an annual follow-up endoscopy one year before MRGC detection. In seven lesions at the pseudofornix, visibility was only secured in two (28.6%) because of food residues. Of the 25 lesions in the non-pseudo-fornix, visibility was secured in 21 lesions (84%; P=0.010).
Conclusions
Endoscopic visibility increases the chances of ER applicability. Special preparation is required to ensure the complete clearance of food residues in the pseudo-fornix.
7.Characteristics of Metachronous Remnant Gastric Cancer After Proximal Gastrectomy: A Retrospective Analysis
Kenichi ISHIZU ; Tsutomu HAYASHI ; Rei OGAWA ; Masashi NISHINO ; Ryota SAKON ; Takeyuki WADA ; Sho OTSUKI ; Yukinori YAMAGATA ; Hitoshi KATAI ; Yoshiyuki MATSUI ; Takaki YOSHIKAWA
Journal of Gastric Cancer 2024;24(3):280-290
Purpose:
Despite annual endoscopy, patients with metachronous remnant gastric cancer (MRGC) following proximal gastrectomy (PG) are at times ineligible for endoscopic resection (ER). This study aimed to clarify the clinical risk factors for ER inapplicability.
Materials and Methods:
We reviewed the records of 203 patients who underwent PG for cT1 gastric cancer between 2006 and 2015. The remnant stomach was categorized as a pseudofornix, corpus, or antrum.
Results:
Thirty-two MRGCs were identified in the 29 patients. Twenty MRGCs were classified as ER (ER group, 62.5%), whereas 12 were not (non-ER group, 37.5%). MRGCs were located in the pseudo-fornix in 1, corpus in 5, and antrum in 14 in the ER group, and in the pseudofornix in 6, corpus in 4, and antrum in 2 in the non-ER group (P=0.019). Multivariate analysis revealed that the pseudo-fornix was an independent risk factor for non-ER (P=0.014). In the non-ER group, MRGCs at the pseudo-fornix (n=6) had more frequent undifferentiated-type histology (4/6 vs. 0/6), deeper (≥pT1b2; 6/6 vs. 2/6) and nodal metastasis (3/6 vs. 0/6) than non-pseudo-fornix lesions (n=6). We examined the visibility of the region developing MRGC on an annual follow-up endoscopy one year before MRGC detection. In seven lesions at the pseudofornix, visibility was only secured in two (28.6%) because of food residues. Of the 25 lesions in the non-pseudo-fornix, visibility was secured in 21 lesions (84%; P=0.010).
Conclusions
Endoscopic visibility increases the chances of ER applicability. Special preparation is required to ensure the complete clearance of food residues in the pseudo-fornix.