PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical course and surgical outcome of infantile exotropia with large and constant angle, as defined by the onset of exotropia before 6 months. METHODS: We reviewed the records of 11 patients who were diagnosed with infantile exotropia and received surgery between July 1987 and December 2003. Age at onset and surgery, visual acuity, refractive error, pre- and post-operative angle of strabismus, and binocular sensory status after surgery were evaluated for each patient. RESULTS: The mean age at onset, diagnosis, and first surgery was 2.3 months (range, birth to 5 months), 14.9 months (range, 4 to 33 months), and 36.3 months (range, 11 to 45 months), respectively. The mean size of preoperative exodeviation was 57.3 prism diopters (PD) (range, 40 to 100 PD). Six patients (54.5%) required reoperation to correct residual or recurred exotropia, oblique dysfunction, and/or DVD. Two (18.2%) of the six required a third operation. Sensory tests including Lang test were performed in seven patients but all failed in Lang test and showed no fusion even with successful surgical treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Infantile exotropia should be observed for a long period and needs proper reoperation because it may be frequently associated with residual or recurred exotropia, oblique dysfunction, and/or DVD after initial operation. However, improvement of binocular function can rarely be expected even with successful surgical alignment.
Diagnosis ; Exotropia* ; Humans ; Parturition ; Refractive Errors ; Reoperation ; Strabismus ; Telescopes ; Visual Acuity

PURPOSE: To compare and evaluate the total and internal aberrations measured by two aberrometers: the laser ray tracing aberrometer (iTrace, Tracey Technology) and the automatic retinoscope aberrometer (OPD Scan, Nidek). METHODS: A total of 54 healthy eyes were enrolled in the study. Following pupil dilation, aberrations were measured with the iTrace and OPD Scan. We compared the aberrations obtained from measurements obtained at pupillary diameters of 4 mm and 6 mm with the OPD Scan and iTrace. Aberrations of internal optics and total aberrations were compared for the two aberrometers. For each aberrometer and each eye, the averaged Zernike data were used to calculate various root-mean-square (RMS) data. These parameters, together with the refractive parameters, were then analyzed and complimented by paired t-tests. RESULTS: At a pupil diameter of 4 mm, the number of total aberrations in the entire eye showed significant differences for the mean values of spherical aberrations (Z4,0) obtained with the OPD Scan and iTrace aberrometers (p=0.001). Aberrations of the internal optics showed significant differences in the mean values of total RMS, coma (Z3,-1), and trefoil (Z3,3) between the iTrace and OPD Scan (p<0.001, p=0.01, p<0.001) for the same pupil diameter of 4 mm. At a pupil diameter of 6 mm, the two instruments showed a similar number of total aberrations. Aberrations of the internal optics showed significant differences in the mean values of total RMS, spherical aberration (Z4,0), and coma (Z3,-1) between the two devices (p<0.001, p=0.01, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The iTrace and OPD Scan showed the largest number of differences for aberrations of internal optics rather than total aberrations for both pupil diameters. These results suggest that in healthy eyes, the two aberrometers may vary in some details. The aberrometers showed more agreement at a pupil diameter of 6 mm compared to 4 mm.
Adult ; Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological/*instrumentation ; Humans ; Pupil/physiology ; Refractive Errors/*diagnosis ; Reproducibility of Results

PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of the hand-held and table-top autorefractokeratometer in measuring refractive errors by comparing them with cycloplegic retinoscopy. METHODS: Included in the study were 112 eyes of 112 pediatric patients whose mean age was 6.78 +/- 2.61 years (range, 2 to 12 years). The refractive errors of all the eyes were measured with and without cycloplegia using a hand held autorefractokeratometer (Retinomax K-plus 3), table top autorefractokeratometer (Canon RK-F1) and performing cycloplegic retinoscopy. The spherical equivalent, cylindrical axis and keratometer values were statistically compared. RESULTS: The mean spherical equivalent obtained from the Retinomax K-plus 3 was significantly less hyperopic than that of Canon RK-F1 (p = 0.004) before cycloplegia. When the Bland Altman analysis was performed in comparisons of spherical equivalent values measured with the Retinomax K-plus 3, Canon RK-F1 and cycloplegic retinoscopy, it was seen that almost all of the differences between the measurements remained within the range of +/-2 standard deviation. Good agreement was found between Retinomax K-plus 3 and Canon RK-F1 for the Jackson cross-cylinder values at axis 0degrees and 45degrees; keratometer values respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The refractive error components were highly correlated between the two instruments and cycloplegic retinoscopy.
Child ; Child, Preschool ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Refractive Errors/*diagnosis ; *Retinoscopes ; *Retinoscopy ; Vision Screening

PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of the hand-held and table-top autorefractokeratometer in measuring refractive errors by comparing them with cycloplegic retinoscopy. METHODS: Included in the study were 112 eyes of 112 pediatric patients whose mean age was 6.78 +/- 2.61 years (range, 2 to 12 years). The refractive errors of all the eyes were measured with and without cycloplegia using a hand held autorefractokeratometer (Retinomax K-plus 3), table top autorefractokeratometer (Canon RK-F1) and performing cycloplegic retinoscopy. The spherical equivalent, cylindrical axis and keratometer values were statistically compared. RESULTS: The mean spherical equivalent obtained from the Retinomax K-plus 3 was significantly less hyperopic than that of Canon RK-F1 (p = 0.004) before cycloplegia. When the Bland Altman analysis was performed in comparisons of spherical equivalent values measured with the Retinomax K-plus 3, Canon RK-F1 and cycloplegic retinoscopy, it was seen that almost all of the differences between the measurements remained within the range of +/-2 standard deviation. Good agreement was found between Retinomax K-plus 3 and Canon RK-F1 for the Jackson cross-cylinder values at axis 0degrees and 45degrees; keratometer values respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The refractive error components were highly correlated between the two instruments and cycloplegic retinoscopy.
Child ; Child, Preschool ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Refractive Errors/*diagnosis ; *Retinoscopes ; *Retinoscopy ; Vision Screening

To confirm the value of the peripapillary atrophy(PPA) for the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with glaucoma, we performed magnification-corrected morphometry of photographs of 234 eyes of 141 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and 139 eyes of 86 normal subjects. For the data analysis, only one eye of each patient was randomly selected. Both groups did not differ significantly in age. refractive error and disc area. According to the neuroretinal rim/disc area ratio, the glaucoma group was divided into four stages(1; more than 0.61, 2; 0.60~0.41, 3; 0.40~0.21, 4; less than 0.20). PPA differentiated into two different zones(alpha and beta). Zone alpha(0.76+/-0.55mm2 vs 0.47+/-0.32mm2) and zone beta(0.50+/-0.63mm2 vs 0.06+/-0.15mm2) and the total PPA(1.26+/-0.97mm2 vs 0.54+/-0.38mm2) were significantly larger(p=0.0001), and zone beta occurred more often(59.5% vs 17.4%, P=0.0001) in the glaucoma group than in the normal group. The area, angular extent and width of both zones enlarged significantly with increasing stage of glaucoma. The frequency of zone beta increased with advancing stage of glaucoma. These findings suggest that both zone alpha and beta increase continuously with advancing neural rim damage. Therefore, the PPA is useful for the diagnosis and progression of glaucomatous nerve damage.
Atrophy* ; Diagnosis ; Follow-Up Studies ; Glaucoma ; Glaucoma, Open-Angle* ; Humans ; Refractive Errors ; Statistics as Topic

PURPOSE: The epicanthal fold in Korean children is a common cause of pseudoesotropia. Therefore, the present study was undertaken to evaluate the clinical characteristics of strabismus in children diagnosed with pseudoesotropia. METHODS: We reviewed the charts of children diagnosed with strabismus from February 2004 to January 2005. Strabismic children with a history of pseudoesotropia were included in this study. We recorded the age and chief complaints at the time of pseudoesotropia diagnosis as well as the type of strabismus, the visual acuity, chief complaints, and refractive error at the time of strabismus diagnosis. RESULTS: One hundred and two of 734 children with strabismus (13.9%) had a history of pseudoesotropia. The mean age at the time of pseudoesotropia diagnosis was 2.9 years. The mean age at the time of strabismus diagnosis was 4.4 years. The type of strabismus was exotropia in 58 (56.9%) and esotropia in 39 (38.2%) cases. Refractive accommodative esotropia was seen in 89.7% of esotropia cases and the basic type was seen in 86.2% of exotropia cases. The concurrence rate between chief complaints of pseudoesotropia and the type of strabismus diagnosed was lower in exotropia than in esotropia. There was hyperopia in all the esotropia cases, and the distribution of refractive error was variable in exotropia. The frequency of amblyopia was 19.6%. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of strabismus is high in the case of children diagnosed with pseodoesotropia. Therefore, regular examinations for strabismus, refractive error and amblyopia may be necessary.
Amblyopia ; Child* ; Diagnosis ; Esotropia ; Exotropia ; Humans ; Hyperopia ; Incidence ; Refractive Errors ; Strabismus ; Visual Acuity

OBJECTIVE: To compare the results of the three methods of Suresight handheld autorefractor, table-mounted autorefractor and retinoscopy in examination of juveniles patients with or without cycloplegia.
 METHODS: Firstly, 156 eyes of 78 juveniles (5 to 17 years old) were examined by using WelchAllyn Suresight handheld autorefractor and NIDEK ARK-510A table-mounted autorefractor with or without cycloplegia; secondly, retinoscopy was performed with cycloplegia.
 RESULTS: The spherical power measured by methods without cycloplegia were significantly greater than those measured with cycloplegia (P<0.05); without cycloplegia, there was no significant difference in spherical power, cylindrical power and cylindrical axis between Suresight handheld autorefractor and retinoscopy (P>0.05). These results were highly consistent, suggesting a tendency towards a short sight. However, the spherical power and cylindrical power measured by table-mounted autorefractor was significantly different (P<0.05); with cycloplegia, there was significant difference in spherical power between Suresight handheld autorefractor and retinoscopy (P<0.05).
 CONCLUSION Cycloplegic retinoscopy is necessary for juvenile refraction examination. Under natural pupil situation, Suresight handheld autorefractor is better than table-mounted autorefractor, though both show a myopia tendency. Nevertheless, table-mounted autorefractor can be taken as a recommendation for the prescription of lens trial. As a strong reference for subjective optometry, retinoscopy should be the gold standard for measuring refractive errors.
Adolescent ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Humans ; Myopia ; diagnosis ; Optometry ; instrumentation ; methods ; Refraction, Ocular ; Refractive Errors ; Retinoscopy

PURPOSE: The peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFL) was measured in normal children using optical coherence tomography (OCT), and the effect of various factors on the RNFL thickness was examined. METHODS: From April 2006 to January 2007, the RNFL thickness of 74 normal children (148 eyes) between the ages of 4 and 17 years old was measured by OCT, and the effect of factors such as age, gender, refractive error, C/D ratios, cooperation, and laterality on the peripapillary RNFL thickness was analyzed. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 10.2 years (4~17 years), and the mean peripapillary RNFL thickness was 106.3+/-12.8 micrometer. As to the thickness of the different peripapillary locations, the superior side was thickest (135.3+/-20.6 micrometer), followed in order by the inferior side (130.9+/-23.0 micrometer), the temporal side (86.3+/-18.9 micrometer), and the nasal side (71.9+/-20.8 micrometer). The refractive error was correlated positively with RNFL thickness (r=0.277, p=0.001), and age correlated negatively with RNFL thickness (r=-0.194, p=0.018). CONCLUSIONS: RNFL thickness in normal children increases as the refractive error becomes hyperopic and decreases with age. The data about RNFL thickness of normal children obtained in this study may provide useful information for an early diagnosis of pediatric neuroophthalmologic disease and for monitoring its progression.
Child ; Early Diagnosis ; Humans ; Negotiating ; Nerve Fibers ; Refractive Errors ; Retinaldehyde ; Tomography, Optical Coherence

Quantification of the optic nerve head topography is getting more and more important in diagnosis, differential diagnosis and follow-up of optic nerve diseases, especially in glaucoma. This study was undartaken to measura optic disc parameters and further to determine side, gender, age, refractive errorrelated differences in the size and topography of the optic disc. The radius and angle of the optic disc and cup were measured every 30 degrees by a computer graphic program(Adobe Photoshop(TM)) in 142 eyes of 78 normal subjects(37 men, 41 women, mean age 47.2 +/- 14.2). The actual optic disc sizes were corrected based on refraction and anterior corneal curvature utilizing Littmanns method. Optic disc area averaged 2.47 +/- 0.48mm2, vertical disc diameter 1.86 +/- 0.18mm, horizontal disc diameter 1.68 +/- 0.18mm. Optic cup area averaged 0.56 +/- 0.28mm2, vertical cup diameter 0.68 +/- 0.28mm, horizontal cup diameter 0.84 +/- 0.27mm. Neuroretinal rim area averaged 1.90 +/- 0.37mm2 and rim width was widest in the inferior disc pole, followed by the superior, nasal, and temporal poles. A highly significant linear correlation between disc area and rim area was observed(r=0.81, p=0.0001) together with a correlation between the disc area and cup area(r=0.58, p=0.0001). Concerning optic disc area, side differences of 0.25mm2 or less were found in 60% and of 0.5 mm2 or less in 90%. Concerning neuroretinal rim area, side differences of 0.25mm2 or less were found in 73% and of 0.5mm2 or less in 90%. There were no significant correlations between these morphometric optic disc data and side, gender, age, or refractive error.
Computer Graphics ; Diagnosis ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Female ; Glaucoma ; Humans ; Male ; Microcomputers* ; Optic Disk ; Optic Nerve Diseases ; Radius ; Refractive Errors

Quantitative analysis of the optic nerve head topography is important in diagnosis, differential diagnosis and follow-up of optic nerve diseases, especially in glaucoma. This study was undertaken to analyze the optic nerve head with confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope(TopSSTM Software Version 2.2, LDT.Inc) and further to determine gender, age, refractive error and axial length-based on differences in the size and topography of the optic disc. One hundred normal human optic nerve heads of 100 subjects (42 men, 58 women, mean age 43.3+/-14.5 years) were evaluated. The men value of the parameters in TopSSTM were as follows : horizontal disc diameter 1.62+/-0.17mm, vertical disc diameter 1.77+/-0.24mm average disc diameter 1.71+/-0.15mm, disc area 2.31+/-0.43 mm2, cup area 1.01+/-0.50 mm2, horizontal cup to disc ratio 0.52+/-0.17, vertical cup to disc ratio 0.47+/-0.20, average cup to disc ratio 0.45+/-0.18, rim area 1.30+/-0.35 mm2. There were no significant correlations between these morphometric optic disc parameters and age, refractive error or axial length(p>0.05). However, male subjects had about 10% larger optic discs compared with female subjects. The optic disc size was well correlated with cup area and rim area (p<0.05).
Diagnosis ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Glaucoma ; Humans ; Male ; Optic Disk ; Optic Nerve Diseases ; Refractive Errors