OBJECTIVEThe aim of this study was to analyze the clinical features and prognostic factors in patients with brain metastasis from colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODSClinical materials of 45 colorectal cancer patients who developed brain metastasis were collected, and the data and follow-up data of those patients were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTSMost brain metastases were from rectal cancer (64.4%), and 80.0% of the 45 cases had extracranial metastases. The most common extracranial metastatic site was the lung (57.8%), followed by the liver (35.6%). All the brain metastases in patients with liver metastases were supratentorial, while in contrast, 44.8% of the patients without liver metastasis had subtentorial metastasis, showing a significant difference between them (P<0.05). The interval time from diagnosis of CRC to the development of brain metastases in case of Dukes D stage was 12.0 months, significantly shorter than that in the cases of Dukes A stage (24.0 months), B (36.0 months) and C (29.0 months) (P<0.05). The interval time was also shorter in the patients who developed extracranial metastasis within one year than those more than one year (12.0 months vs. 38.0 months)( P<0.05). The median survival time of patients with brain metastasis from colorectal was 6.0 months, with a 1-year survival rate of 21.1% and 2-year survival rate of 3.3% only. Univariate analysis showed that the median survival of patients with a KPS score of ≥70 was 8.0 months, significantly higher than 2.0 months in those with a KPS score of <70 (P<0.05). The median survival of patients with one or two brain metastases was 8.0 months, significantly higher than 4.0 months of those with >2 brain metastases (P<0.05). The median survival time after diagnosis of brain metastasis was 4.0 months for those who received monotherapy (only steroids, only chemotherapy or only radiotherapy), significantly shorter than 10.0 months of patients who received chemoradiotherapy, and 12.0 months of those who underwent surgery (P<0.05). Comparing each two differently treated groups, the survival time of surgery combined with chemotherapy or radiotherapy group was significantly different from that of all of other groups (P<0.05). The median survival time of chemoradiotherapy group was longer than that of monotherapy, but the difference was not significant (P>0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that brain metastases >2 and treatment modality type are independent prognostic factors for survival.

CONCLUSIONSPatients initially diagnosed with a Dukes D stage primary colorectal tumor and occurrence of extracranial metastasis (especially, pulmonary metastasis) within one year are associated to an increased risk of brain metastases and have a shorter survival time. Most brain metastases in patients with liver metastases are supratentorial, while many patients without liver metastasis have subtentorial metastasis. Brain metastases >2 and the type of treatment modality are independent prognostic factors for survival. The prognosis of patients who received chemoradiotherapy is better than those treated only with chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Some subsets of patients may benefit from surgery plus chemotherapy/radiotherapy.

Brain Neoplasms ; mortality ; secondary ; therapy ; Chemoradiotherapy ; Colorectal Neoplasms ; Humans ; Liver Neoplasms ; secondary ; Lung Neoplasms ; secondary ; Neoplasm Staging ; Prognosis ; Rectal Neoplasms ; pathology ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Rate ; Time Factors

OBJECTIVEThe present study assessed the pathological staging features of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, and its relation to prognosis.

METHODSPathologic data related to TNM classification were analyzed on the surgical specimens of 135 patients with mid-low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant themoradiotherapy from 2005 to 2012. Tumor invasion, nodal status, local invasive factors (including cancer deposit, radial margin, perivascular or perineural invasion) were investigated with patients' 3-year disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTSThe overall 3-year DFS was 85.2%, with a pathological complete response (pCR) rate of 19.26%. Three out of 29 patients (10.4%) with ypT0 were found to have positive lymph nodes. There was a trend towards decreased survival as the ypT category and ypTNM staging increased (χ(2) = 14.296 and 52.643, P = 0.006 and 0.000). ypT0-T2 in T category and yp0-I in TNM staging showed a favorable survival above 92%, while the patients with ypT3, or ypIIIB had a comparable lower DFS of 70.2% and 46.7%. DFS in patients with negative lymph node were significantly improved than those with positive nodes (93.5% vs. 66.7%, χ(2) = 34.125, P = 0.000). Patients with or without local invasive factor significantly differed in DFS (42.9% vs. 90.1%, χ(2) = 32.666, P = 0.000) . Cox regression analyze showed that the nodal status (RR = 12.312, 95%CI: 2.828-39.258, P = 0.000) and local invasive factors (RR = 5.422, 95%CI: 1.202-8.493, P = 0.020) were independent risk factors to 3-year survival. As the concept of clinical complete response (cCR) is obscure, there were 27.6% of patients with ypT0 had normal mucosa or no evidence of tumor by EUS or MRI tests before surgery.

CONCLUSIONPostoperative pathologic staging features were closely associated with patient's prognosis. The increasing of ypT or ypTNM staging was correlated to decreasing of DFS. Nodal status, positive radial margin, perivascular and perineural invasion were independent risk factors to DFS. Since cCR did not correlate and could not predict pCR, the ongoing radical surgery could not be avoided even there was no evidence of tumor existing before operation.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Neoplasm Staging ; Postoperative Period ; Prognosis ; Rectal Neoplasms ; diagnosis ; mortality ; pathology ; Young Adult

OBJECTIVETo summarize and analyze the clinicopathological features and surgical management of patients with pathologic complete response (pCR) in the primary tumor after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for rectal cancer, and to explore the rational treatment of this entity.

METHODSClinical data of fifty-two patients with locally advanced mid-low rectal cancer admitted to the Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from January 1994 to December 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. They were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and achieved pathological complete response in the primary tumor. The preoperative clinical staging were stage II (cT3~4N0) in 10 cases and stage III (cT3~4N+) in 42 cases. After the neoadjuvant therapy, 10 cases achieved clinical complete response (cCR) (19.2%).

RESULTSRadical surgery was performed in 51 patients. Among them, five patients (9.8%) had pathological lymph node metastasis. One cCR patient underwent transanal local excision. The postoperative complication rate was 21.2%. During a median follow-up of 23.6 months, only one patient developed bone metastasis and another one had enlarged mesenteric and retroperitoneal lymph nodes detected by imaging. All the patients were alive by the last follow-up. The 2-year disease-free survival rate was 96.2% and overall survival rate was 100%.

CONCLUSIONSRadical surgery remains the standard therapy for cCR patients with rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Local excision and "wait and see" should be recommended with great caution and limited to patients who cannot tolerate or refuse radical surgery with a strong demanding for sphincter saving, or applied in clinical trials.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ; methods ; Disease-Free Survival ; Humans ; Lymph Nodes ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; methods ; Neoplasm Staging ; Postoperative Complications ; Rectal Neoplasms ; drug therapy ; mortality ; pathology ; surgery ; Remission Induction ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Rate

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The objective of this study was to assess the prognostic roles of treatment response and tissue necrosis after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS: A total of 243 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant CRT were included. Three treatment response groups were classified by their pathological stage results: complete treatment response (CTR), intermediate treatment response (ITR), and poor treatment response (PTR). Three tissue necrosis groups were classified based on tissue pathological results: complete necrosis response (CNR), intermediate necrosis response (INR), and poor necrosis response (PNR). RESULTS: Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate at three years were 74.5% and 61.3%, respectively. The 3-year OS rates of the CTR, ITR, and PTR groups were 83.7%, 75.9%, and 69.7%, respectively (p < 0.001); the 3-year RFS rates were 76.7%, 69.0%, and 52.1%, respectively (p < 0.001). The 3-year OS rates of the CNR, INR, and PNR groups were 83.7%, 80.6%, and 61.8%, respectively (p < 0.001); the 3-year RFS rates were 76.7%, 68.9%, and 44.3%, respectively (p < 0.001). When compared to CTR/CNR, PTR/PNR was strongly related to an increased risk of recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 5.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.01 to 15.23 vs. HR, 6.37; 95% CI, 2.29 to 17.74, respectively) in univariate Cox regression. Both PTR and PNR were strongly associated with shorter RFS and OS when compared with CTR and CNR in the multivariate Cox regression. CONCLUSIONS: Tissue necrosis is an equally important prognostic marker as treatment response for oncologic outcomes in locally advanced rectal cancer.
Aged ; Biopsy ; *Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant/adverse effects/mortality ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Disease Progression ; Disease-Free Survival ; Female ; Humans ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; *Laparoscopy/adverse effects/mortality ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Necrosis ; *Neoadjuvant Therapy/adverse effects/mortality ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Neoplasm Staging ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Rectal Neoplasms/mortality/pathology/*therapy ; Remission Induction ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome