OBJECTIVETo investigate cachexia in hospitalized patients with digestive system cancer and evaluate its impact on clinical outcomes.

METHODSBy analyzing the clinical data of 5118 hospitalized patients with digestive system cancer in Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University from January 2012 to December 2013, cachexia was investigated and clinical outcomes between cachexia patients and non-cachexia patients was compared.

RESULTSThe total cachexia rate of hospitalized patients with digestive system cancer was 15.7%(803/5118). The highest rate of cachexia was 34.0%(89/262) in patients with pancreatic cancer followed by gastric cancer 22.4%(261/1164), colon cancer 21.7%(146/672), and rectal cancer 20.1%(117/581). In cachexia group and non-cachexia group, the overall completion rate of radical resection was 67.1%(539/803) and 74.5%(3214/4315) respectively(P<0.05). Compared to the non-cachexia group, the cachexia group was associated with longer postoperative hospital stay [(11.5±6.2) d vs. (9.4±4.9) d, P<0.05], slower postoperative recovery of bowel function [(3.4±0.9) d vs. (3.2±0.8) d, P<0.05], longer postoperative time to intake of semifluid [(4.4±1.5) d vs. (3.9±1.1) d, P<0.05], and more postoperative complications within 28 days after radical surgery [8.9%(48/539) vs. 5.8%(186/3214), P<0.05]. After radical surgery, the ICU admission rate of the cachexia group [24.3%(131/539)] was higher than that of the non-cachexia group [20.1%(646/3214)] with significant difference(P<0.05). Compared to non-cachexia group, the reoperation rate [3.2%(17/539) vs. 1.5%(48/3214), P<0.05], ventilator support rate [8.0%(43/539)vs. 5.7%(184/3214), P<0.05] and mortality [2.4%(13/539) vs. 1.1%(35/3214), P<0.05] in the cachexia group were all significantly higher(all P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONSCachexia is commen in patients with digestive system cancer. Cachexia has significant adverse effects on clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients with digestive system cancer.

Cachexia ; etiology ; Colonic Neoplasms ; complications ; Defecation ; Humans ; Postoperative Complications ; Rectal Neoplasms ; complications ; Reoperation ; Stomach Neoplasms ; complications

Metastases to the breast from extramammary neoplasms are very rare, constituting 2.7% of all malignant breast tumours. The most common primary tumor metastatic to the breast is primary breast cancer. Rectal cancer metastasizing to the breast is extremely rare. We report a case of aggressive rectal carcinoma with metastasis to the breast.
Breast Neoplasms ; secondary ; Female ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Rectal Neoplasms ; complications

No abstract available.
Body Mass Index* ; Humans ; Pelvic Exenteration* ; Postoperative Complications* ; Rectal Neoplasms*

Anal Canal ; surgery ; Humans ; Postoperative Complications ; Rectal Neoplasms ; surgery

OBJECTIVETo investigate the safety and feasibility of domestically made endoscopic stapling instrument in laparoscopic assisted rectal cancer resection (Dixon).

METHODSSixty-four patients with rectal cancer were randomly divided into the research group (35 cases) to receive laparoscopic assisted rectal cancer resection using ENDO RLC general endoscopic linear cutter and single-use loading unit and circular staplers with staples (from REACH medical equipment co.LTD) and the control group (29 cases) to receive surgery with the corresponding products widely used (fom Johnson and Johnson Medical Euipment C.Ltd). The clinical data of the two groups were compared.

RESULTSSatisfactory therapeutic effects were obtained in all the cases. The two groups showed no significant differences in the operative time, intraoperative anastomosis success rate, or postoperative complications (anastomotic bleeding, leakage, or stricture) between the two groups (P>0.05), but the average cost of endoscopic stapling instrument was significantly lower in the research group (6604.31 ± 699.95 vs 7822.28 ± 576.98 RMB Yuan, P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONThe domestic endoscopic stapling instrument is safe, effective and less costly for laparoscopic assisted rectal cancer resection.

Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Postoperative Complications ; Rectal Neoplasms ; surgery ; Surgical Stapling ; instrumentation

The majority of ureteric injury is iatrogenic during surgical procedures especially pelvic and retroperitoneal operations. Approximately 10% of ureteric injury is associated with colorectal procedures. The major cause is anatomical anomaly. The types of injuries mainly include contusion, clamp injury, ligation injury, cautery, cut injury and distorted traction to an acute angle. The injuries are mainly located in the lower segment of the ureter. An accurate evaluation of the risk of ureteric injury before rectal cancer operation, a better understanding of anatomy in both normal and abnormal conditions, and ureteral stent placement, are important methods to prevent ureteric injury. Primary repair is the best treatment option.
Humans ; Intraoperative Complications ; prevention & control ; Rectal Neoplasms ; surgery ; Ureter ; injuries

OBJECTIVETo report a case of rectal non-Hodgkin lymphoma with concomitant rectal adenocarcinoma.

METHODSClinical records of a 71 years old male patient with rectal non-Hodgkin lymphoma with concomitant rectal adenocarcinoma admitted on May 19, 2010 to the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yet-sen University were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment as well as postoperative pathology were summarized.

RESULTSThe preoperative diagnosis of the patient was severe atypical adenomatous hyperplasia with focal carcinogenesis, and the preoperative staging was T2N0-1M0. The patient underwent a Parks procedure (rectal resection and colo-anal anastomosis) and subtotal resection of left lateral liver. The operation was successful, postoperative recovery uneventful. Postoperative pathology showed moderately differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma with deep muscular invasion, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma with marginal zone cell. Both the distal and proximal resection margins were negative and no vascular and neural invasion were seen. Immunohistochemical staining indicated L26(+), Bcl-2(+), Bcl-6(+), CD3(-), CD23(-), CK epithelial cells(+), and M-CEA luminal border(+). The pathological and immunohistochemistry results of liver specimens showed hepatic mucosa-associated marginal zone lymphoma.

CONCLUSIONSRectal adenocarcinoma and lymphoma occurring at the same site simultaneously is extremely rare with unique pathologic features.

Adenocarcinoma ; complications ; pathology ; Aged ; Humans ; Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin ; complications ; pathology ; Male ; Rectal Neoplasms ; complications ; pathology

A 30-yr-old man was referred for suspicious rectal cancer because of ulcerated lesions in the rectum and a palpable mass in left inguinal area. Sigmoidoscopy showed two indurated masses and histologic evaluation of biopsy revealed obliterative endarteritis with heavy plasma cell infiltration. Both venereal disease research laboratories (VDRL) and fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption (FTA-ABS) tests were positive. After injection of penicillin G benzathine for 3 weeks, the rectal chancre and the palpable mass disappeared.
Adult ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Humans ; Male ; Rectal Diseases/*complications/drug therapy/*pathology ; Rectal Neoplasms/pathology ; Syphilis/*complications/drug therapy/*pathology

PURPOSE: Previous studies have demonstrated the prognostic impact of the prognostic nutritional index (PNI), a proposed indicator of immunonutritional statuses of surgical patients, on patients with various gastrointestinal cancers. Although the prognostic impact of the PNI on patients with colorectal cancer has been well established, its value has not been studied in patients treated with preoperative chemoradiation (pCRT). This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of PNI on patients receiving pCRT for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). METHODS: Patients with LARC who underwent curative pCRT followed by surgical resection were enrolled. The PNI was measured in all patients before and after pCRT, and the difference in values was calculated as the PNI difference (dPNI). Patients were classified according to dPNI (<5, 5–10, and >10). Clinicopathologic parameters and long-term oncologic outcomes were assessed according to dPNI classification. RESULTS: No significant intergroup differences were observed in clinicopathologic parameters such as age, histologic grade, tumor location, tumor-node-metastasis stage, and postoperative complications. Approximately 53% of the patients had a mild dPNI (<5); only 15% had a high dPNI (>10). Univariate and multivariate analyses identified the dPNI as an independent prognostic factor for disease-free status (P < 0.01; hazard ratio [HR], 2.792; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.577–4.942) and for cancer-specific survival (P = 0.012; HR, 2.469; 95%CI, 1.225–4.978). CONCLUSION: The dPNI is predictive of long-term outcomes in pCRT-treated patients with LARC. Further prospective studies should investigate whether immune-nutritional status correction during pCRT would improve oncologic outcomes.
Classification ; Colorectal Neoplasms ; Gastrointestinal Neoplasms ; Humans ; Multivariate Analysis ; Nutrition Assessment ; Postoperative Complications ; Prospective Studies ; Rectal Neoplasms*

OBJECTIVETo investigate the approach and efficacy of dealing the rectal ligament in resection of rectal cancer in obese male patients.

METHODSA total of 92 patients (BMI>25 kg/m(2)) undergoing resection of rectal cancer from December 2008 to December 2010 in Henan Tumor hospital were assigned into 2 groups according to the surgical technique, the modified group (paralleled clipping of rectal ligament, 48 patients) and traditional group (44 patients). Operative time, intra-operational bleeding, rectal ulceration, ureteral injury, mesorectal integrity, and positive rate of lateral margin of pelvic wall were compared between two groups.

RESULTSThe operative time was (66.9±99.8) min in modified group, which was significantly shorter than that in traditional group [(125.4±12.2) min, P=0.000]. Intra-operative bleeding was (160.3±27.2) ml in modified group and (150.5±28.5) ml in traditional group (P=0.093). Rectal ulceration rated were 0 and 18.2% (8/44), mesorectal disintegrity rates were 6.2% and 22.7%, pelvic infection rates were 2.1% (1/48) and 20.4 (9/44) in modified and traditional groups respectively, whose differences were all significant (all P<0.05). No ureteral injury and positive margin were found in both two groups.

CONCLUSIONThe approach of paralleled clipping of rectal ligament around the rectum meets the principle of TME, which is simple, safe and effective.

Adult ; Aged ; Humans ; Ligaments ; surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Obesity ; complications ; Rectal Neoplasms ; complications ; surgery ; Rectum ; surgery