Rectal syphilis, known as a great masquerader, can be difficult to diagnose because of its variable symptoms. Gastroenterologists should be aware of the possibility of rectal syphilis when confronted with anorectal ulcers, and should gather a detailed history about sexual preferences and practices, including homosexuality. We report a case of primary rectal syphilis mimicking rectal cancer on radiologic imaging. In this report, we described the clinical, endoscopic, and radiologic features of this rare case.
Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Rectal Diseases/*diagnosis/pathology/radiography ; Rectal Neoplasms/*pathology/radiography ; Syphilis/*diagnosis/pathology/radiography

OBJECTIVE: To determine the helical CT findings which help differentiate between focal eosinophilic necrosis (FEN) of the liver and metastasis in patients with underlying gastric or colorectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHDOS: In 21 patients with underlying gastric and colorectal cancer examined during a recent 18-month period, the presence of FEN (n=90) was proven at CT. The diagnosis was verified by biopsy in eight patients and by the transient nature of the findings related to peripheral eosinophilia (>10%) in the remainder. For comparison, 20 consecutive patients with pathologically proven hepatic metastasis from gastric or colorectal cancer (n=158) were selected. Single-phase helical CT images (7-mm collimation, pitch 1:1) were independently analyzed in a random order by two blinded readers. The parameters evaluated included the margin (depicted border, fuzzy), shape (spherical, non-spherical), attenuation (subtle hypoattenuation, hypoattenuation), and the presence or absence of rim enhancement. RESULTS: FEN far more frequently showed a fuzzy margin (81%, 84%), subtle hypoattenuation (89%, 91%), and a non-spherical shape (84% for both readers) than metastasis, for which the respective findings were 6%, 22%; 20%, 39%; and 15%, 23%. Rim enhancement was seldom found in FEN (0%, 2%), but was recognized by both readers in 40% of metastases. For all parameters, the results were statistically significant (p < .01), and showed that both readers correctly differentiated FEN from metastasis in 78% of the patients (32/41). Interobserver agreement was, in addition, excellent (K= 0.66). CONCLUSION: When focal hepatic lesions with a fuzzy margin, non-spherical shape and subtle hypoattenuation without rim enhancement are found, the possibility of FEN should be considered even in patients with underlying gastrointestinal malignancy.
Algorithms ; Colonic Neoplasms/*radiography ; Eosinophilia/*pathology ; Female ; Human ; Liver/*pathology ; Male ; Middle Age ; Necrosis ; Rectal Neoplasms/*radiography ; Stomach Neoplasms/*radiography ; *Tomography, X-Ray Computed

No abstract available.
Diagnosis, Differential ; Endosonography ; Female ; Humans ; Incidental Findings ; *Intestinal Mucosa/pathology/radiography/surgery ; Intestinal Polyps/*diagnosis/pathology/radiography/surgery ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasms, Fibroepithelial/*diagnosis/pathology/radiography/surgery ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Rectal Neoplasms/*diagnosis/pathology/radiography/surgery ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

Anorectum is a rare location for malignant lymphoma. Involvement of is rare even for the lymphoma associated with acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), and AIDS has a relatively increased frequency of anorectal lymphoma. Most lymphomas in AIDS patients are of a B-cell origin, and T-cell lymphoma of the gastrointestinal tract is extremely rare. We report here on a case of anorectal and gastric peripheral T-cell lymphoma, unspecified (PTCLu) in a non-AIDS patient. A previously healthy 29-year-old man presented with hematochezia and tenesmus that he had suffered with for the previous 2 months. Sigmoidoscopy showed anal and rectal submucosal tumor. Multiple round-shaped, flat and elevated lesions were noted on the gastric antrum and body as well. He underwent excisional biopsy for the anal mass and the diagnosis was PTCLu. Biopsies of the gastric lesions gave the same diagnosis. There was no lymphoma involved in the bone marrow. At admission, no antibodies against human immunodeficiency virus were detected. He underwent systemic chemotherapy and upfront autologous stem cell transplantation.
Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Stomach Neoplasms/*pathology/radiography ; Sigmoidoscopy ; Rectal Neoplasms/*pathology/radiography ; Male ; Lymphoma, T-Cell, Peripheral/*pathology/radiography ; Humans ; Gastroscopy ; Follow-Up Studies ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Biopsy ; Adult ; Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/*diagnosis

No abstract availble.
Aged ; Humans ; Liver Neoplasms/radiography/*radionuclide imaging/*secondary ; Male ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/*radionuclide imaging ; *Positron-Emission Tomography ; Rectal Neoplasms/pathology/*radionuclide imaging ; Sigmoidoscopes

OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR)-applied ultra-low-dose CT (ULDCT) in detecting small lung nodules. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients underwent both ULDCT and standard dose CT (SCT). After determining the reference standard nodules, five observers, blinded to the reference standard reading results, independently evaluated SCT and both subsets of ASIR- and filtered back projection (FBP)-driven ULDCT images. Data assessed by observers were compared statistically. RESULTS: Converted effective doses in SCT and ULDCT were 2.81 +/- 0.92 and 0.17 +/- 0.02 mSv, respectively. A total of 114 lung nodules were detected on SCT as a standard reference. There was no statistically significant difference in sensitivity between ASIR-driven ULDCT and SCT for three out of the five observers (p = 0.678, 0.735, < 0.01, 0.038, and < 0.868 for observers 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively). The sensitivity of FBP-driven ULDCT was significantly lower than that of ASIR-driven ULDCT in three out of the five observers (p < 0.01 for three observers, and p = 0.064 and 0.146 for two observers). In jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic analysis, the mean values of figure-of-merit (FOM) for FBP, ASIR-driven ULDCT, and SCT were 0.682, 0.772, and 0.821, respectively, and there were no significant differences in FOM values between ASIR-driven ULDCT and SCT (p = 0.11), but the FOM value of FBP-driven ULDCT was significantly lower than that of ASIR-driven ULDCT and SCT (p = 0.01 and 0.00). CONCLUSION: Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-driven ULDCT delivering a radiation dose of only 0.17 mSv offers acceptable sensitivity in nodule detection compared with SCT and has better performance than FBP-driven ULDCT.
Adult ; Aged ; Female ; Humans ; Lung/pathology/*radiography ; Lung Neoplasms/*radiography/secondary ; Male ; Middle Aged ; ROC Curve ; Radiation Dosage ; Radiographic Image Enhancement ; Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted ; Rectal Neoplasms/pathology ; Retrospective Studies ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

Multiple primary malignancy was reported firstly by Billroth in 1889. Recently, multiple primary malignancies are considered to increase due to improved survival rate of cancer patients, advanced diagnostic tools, and increased use of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. In Korea, several cases of triple primary malignancies were reported. However, four primary malignancies in gastro-intestinal tract was rarely reported. Recently, we experienced a 70 year-old male who was diagnosed with metachronous four primary malignancies in rectum, ascending colon, stomach, and ampulla of Vater. We report this rare case of metachronous four primary malignancies with a review of literature.
Adenocarcinoma/*diagnosis/pathology/surgery ; Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/diagnosis/surgery ; Aged ; Ampulla of Vater/*pathology ; Colonic Neoplasms/diagnosis/surgery ; Common Bile Duct Neoplasms/*diagnosis/pathology/surgery ; Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/*diagnosis/pathology/radiography ; Humans ; Male ; Neoplasms, Second Primary/*diagnosis/pathology ; Rectal Neoplasms/diagnosis/surgery ; Stomach Neoplasms/diagnosis/pathology/surgery ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

No abstract availble
Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/*adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Colon/pathology/radiography ; Colonoscopy ; Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous/diagnosis/*etiology ; Fluorouracil/*adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Rectal Neoplasms/*drug therapy ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

OBJECTIVE: To assess the follow-up results after negative findings on unenhanced hepatic MR imaging in rectal cancer patients who have undergone locally curative surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From all pertinent imaging reports and medical records, we selected 255 patients who had negative results on unenhanced hepatic MR imaging. When selecting patients who had undergone curative resection, the following patients were excluded from the study: 1) patients in whom extrahepatic metastases were detected on preoperative staging work-ups, 2) patients in whom the surgery was judged to be non-curative due to peritoneal seeding or local aggressiveness. Cases with follow-up periods of less than 18 months were also excluded, as these cases were considered insufficient to confirm the negative outcomes. Thus, a total of 149 patients were ultimately enrolled in our study. The follow-up results of unenhanced MR imagings were assessed according to the assumption that the newly developed hepatic metastases had been false-negative lesions on preoperative MR image. RESULTS: During a median follow-up period of 29.3 months, 25 hepatic metastases were detected in 13 patients (8.7%), which indicated a negative predictive value of 91.3%. CONCLUSION: Unenhanced hepatic MR imaging provides a high negative predictive value with regard to the detection of hepatic metastasis in the preoperative evaluation of rectal cancer.
Adenocarcinoma/*diagnosis/radiography/*secondary/surgery ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Carcinoembryonic Antigen/blood ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures ; False Negative Reactions ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Liver Neoplasms/*diagnosis/radiography/*secondary/surgery ; *Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Invasiveness ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Neoplasm Staging ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Rectal Neoplasms/*pathology ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Analysis ; *Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Treatment Outcome ; Tumor Markers, Biological/blood