No abstract available.
Diagnosis, Differential ; Endosonography ; Female ; Humans ; Incidental Findings ; *Intestinal Mucosa/pathology/radiography/surgery ; Intestinal Polyps/*diagnosis/pathology/radiography/surgery ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasms, Fibroepithelial/*diagnosis/pathology/radiography/surgery ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Rectal Neoplasms/*diagnosis/pathology/radiography/surgery ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

Multiple primary malignancy was reported firstly by Billroth in 1889. Recently, multiple primary malignancies are considered to increase due to improved survival rate of cancer patients, advanced diagnostic tools, and increased use of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. In Korea, several cases of triple primary malignancies were reported. However, four primary malignancies in gastro-intestinal tract was rarely reported. Recently, we experienced a 70 year-old male who was diagnosed with metachronous four primary malignancies in rectum, ascending colon, stomach, and ampulla of Vater. We report this rare case of metachronous four primary malignancies with a review of literature.
Adenocarcinoma/*diagnosis/pathology/surgery ; Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/diagnosis/surgery ; Aged ; Ampulla of Vater/*pathology ; Colonic Neoplasms/diagnosis/surgery ; Common Bile Duct Neoplasms/*diagnosis/pathology/surgery ; Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/*diagnosis/pathology/radiography ; Humans ; Male ; Neoplasms, Second Primary/*diagnosis/pathology ; Rectal Neoplasms/diagnosis/surgery ; Stomach Neoplasms/diagnosis/pathology/surgery ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

OBJECTIVE: To assess the follow-up results after negative findings on unenhanced hepatic MR imaging in rectal cancer patients who have undergone locally curative surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From all pertinent imaging reports and medical records, we selected 255 patients who had negative results on unenhanced hepatic MR imaging. When selecting patients who had undergone curative resection, the following patients were excluded from the study: 1) patients in whom extrahepatic metastases were detected on preoperative staging work-ups, 2) patients in whom the surgery was judged to be non-curative due to peritoneal seeding or local aggressiveness. Cases with follow-up periods of less than 18 months were also excluded, as these cases were considered insufficient to confirm the negative outcomes. Thus, a total of 149 patients were ultimately enrolled in our study. The follow-up results of unenhanced MR imagings were assessed according to the assumption that the newly developed hepatic metastases had been false-negative lesions on preoperative MR image. RESULTS: During a median follow-up period of 29.3 months, 25 hepatic metastases were detected in 13 patients (8.7%), which indicated a negative predictive value of 91.3%. CONCLUSION: Unenhanced hepatic MR imaging provides a high negative predictive value with regard to the detection of hepatic metastasis in the preoperative evaluation of rectal cancer.
Adenocarcinoma/*diagnosis/radiography/*secondary/surgery ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Carcinoembryonic Antigen/blood ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures ; False Negative Reactions ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Liver Neoplasms/*diagnosis/radiography/*secondary/surgery ; *Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Invasiveness ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Neoplasm Staging ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Rectal Neoplasms/*pathology ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Analysis ; *Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Treatment Outcome ; Tumor Markers, Biological/blood