2.Diabetes mellitus does not increase the risk of knee stiffness after total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of 7 studies including 246 053 cases
Christopher JUMP ; Rayaz A MALIK ; Anoop ANAND ; Charalambos P CHARALAMBOUS
The Journal of Korean Knee Society 2019;31(3):e6-
PURPOSE:
The association of diabetes mellitus with knee stiffness after total knee arthroplasty is still being debated. The aim of this study was to assess through meta-analysis the impact of diabetes mellitus on the prevalence of postoperative knee stiffness after total knee arthroplasty.
METHODS:
We conducted a literature search for terms regarding postoperative knee stiffness and diabetes mellitus on Embase, CINAHL, and PubMed NCBI.
RESULTS:
Of 1142 articles, seven were suitable for analysis. Meta-analysis showed that diabetes mellitus does not confer an increased risk of primary or revision total knee arthroplasty-induced postoperative knee stiffness when compared to nondiabetic patients (primary total knee arthroplasty, estimated odds ratio [OR] 1.474 and 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.97–2.23; primary and revision total knee arthroplasty, OR 1.340 and 95% CI 0.97–1.83).
CONCLUSION
There is no strong evidence that diabetes mellitus increases the risk of knee stiffness after total knee arthroplasty. The decision to proceed with total knee arthroplasty, discussion as part of the consent process, and subsequent rehabilitation should not differ between patients with and without diabetes mellitus with regards to risk of stiffness.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III (meta-analysis)
3.Diagnosing Diabetic Neuropathy: Something Old, Something New.
Ioannis N PETROPOULOS ; Georgios PONIRAKIS ; Adnan KHAN ; Hamad ALMUHANNADI ; Hoda GAD ; Rayaz A MALIK
Diabetes & Metabolism Journal 2018;42(4):255-269
There are potentially many ways of assessing diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). However, they do not fulfill U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requirements in relation to their capacity to assess therapeutic benefit in clinical trials of DPN. Over the past several decades symptoms and signs, quantitative sensory and electrodiagnostic testing have been strongly endorsed, but have consistently failed as surrogate end points in clinical trials. Therefore, there is an unmet need for reliable biomarkers to capture the onset and progression and to facilitate drug discovery in DPN. Corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) is a non-invasive ophthalmic imaging modality for in vivo evaluation of sensory C-fibers. An increasing body of evidence from multiple centers worldwide suggests that CCM fulfills the FDA criteria as a surrogate endpoint of DPN.
Biomarkers
;
Diabetic Neuropathies*
;
Diagnosis
;
Drug Discovery
;
Microscopy, Confocal
;
Peripheral Nervous System Diseases
;
United States Food and Drug Administration