1.Medial Ball and Socket Total Knee Arthroplasty in Indian Population: 5-Year Clinical Results
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 2022;14(1):90-95
Background:
Medial pivot total knee arthroplasty aims to restore native knee kinematics through highly conforming medial tibiofemoral articulation with survival comparable to contemporary knee designs. The aim of this study was to report preliminary clinical results of medial pivot total knee arthroplasty in an Indian population.
Methods:
A retrospective analysis of 45 patients (average age, 62 years; 40 women and 5 men) with end-stage arthritis (KellgrenLawrence grade 4) operated with a medial pivot prosthesis was done. All patients were assessed using Knee Society Score (satisfaction, expectation, and functional scores) and Oxford Knee Score, and range of motion was recorded at the end of 5-year postoperative follow-up. In addition, all patients underwent standardized radiological assessment.
Results:
At the final follow-up, patients reported significant improvement in mean Knee Society Score (satisfaction, expectation, and functional scores) and Oxford Knee Score (p < 0.05). The mean range of motion achieved at the end of 5 years ranged from 0° (extension) to 118.4° (further flexion). There was no evidence of loosening or osteolysis at a minimum follow-up of 5 years.
Conclusions
These results demonstrated satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes at 5 years after total knee arthroplasty with a medial pivot design, which may be related to better replication of natural knee kinematics with the medial pivot knee and inherent advantages of this design.
2.Difference of Neck Shortening in Femoral Neck Fracture between Femoral Neck System and Multiple Cannulated Cancellous Screws: Single Center, Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Saurabh GUPTA ; Abhay ELHENCE ; Sumit BANERJEE ; Sandeep YADAV ; Prabodh KANTIWAL ; Rajesh Kumar RAJNISH ; Pushpinder KHERA ; Rajesh MALHOTRA
Hip & Pelvis 2024;36(4):310-319
Purpose:
Fracture union after osteosynthesis of a fracture neck femur (FNF) occurs by compression of the fracture ends and potential neck shortening. Selection of an implant for fixation of a femoral fracture of the neck can be challenging when making management decisions. Femoral neck shortening after internal fixation of FNFs using a femoral neck system (FNS) or multiple cannulated cancellous screws (MCS) was compared.
Materials and Methods:
This prospective interventional single-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted at a university teaching hospital. Sixty patients undergoing internal fixation for management of sub-capital or trans-cervical FNFs were randomized and assigned, to one of the two groups—the test group (FNS group) and the control group (MCS group). Primary outcome was determined by measuring the difference in 1-year shortening of the femoral neck on radiographs between FNS and MCS. The secondary objective was to determine the correlation between neck shortening with patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) at the end of the final follow-up.
Results:
At the final follow-up, shortening of the femoral neck was 3.77±1.87 mm in the FNS group, significantly lower compared with the MCS group, 6.53±1.59 mm.
Conclusion
Significantly less shortening of the femoral neck was observed in the FNS group compared with the MCS group. No statistically significant difference in PROMs was observed at 1-year follow-up. The findings of the study suggest that FNS can be regarded as a suitable alternative for internal fixation in young adults (<60 years) with trans-cervical and subcapital FNFs.
3.Retraction: Difference of Neck Shortening in Femoral Neck Fracture between Femoral Neck System and Multiple Cannulated Cancellous Screws: Single Center, Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Saurabh GUPTA ; Abhay ELHENCE ; Sumit BANERJEE ; Sandeep YADAV ; Prabodh KANTIWAL ; Rajesh Kumar RAJNISH ; Pushpinder KHERA ; Rajesh MALHOTRA
Hip & Pelvis 2025;37(1):85-85
4.Difference of Neck Shortening in Femoral Neck Fracture between Femoral Neck System and Multiple Cannulated Cancellous Screws: Single Center, Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Saurabh GUPTA ; Abhay ELHENCE ; Sumit BANERJEE ; Sandeep YADAV ; Prabodh KANTIWAL ; Rajesh Kumar RAJNISH ; Pushpinder KHERA ; Rajesh MALHOTRA
Hip & Pelvis 2024;36(4):310-319
Purpose:
Fracture union after osteosynthesis of a fracture neck femur (FNF) occurs by compression of the fracture ends and potential neck shortening. Selection of an implant for fixation of a femoral fracture of the neck can be challenging when making management decisions. Femoral neck shortening after internal fixation of FNFs using a femoral neck system (FNS) or multiple cannulated cancellous screws (MCS) was compared.
Materials and Methods:
This prospective interventional single-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted at a university teaching hospital. Sixty patients undergoing internal fixation for management of sub-capital or trans-cervical FNFs were randomized and assigned, to one of the two groups—the test group (FNS group) and the control group (MCS group). Primary outcome was determined by measuring the difference in 1-year shortening of the femoral neck on radiographs between FNS and MCS. The secondary objective was to determine the correlation between neck shortening with patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) at the end of the final follow-up.
Results:
At the final follow-up, shortening of the femoral neck was 3.77±1.87 mm in the FNS group, significantly lower compared with the MCS group, 6.53±1.59 mm.
Conclusion
Significantly less shortening of the femoral neck was observed in the FNS group compared with the MCS group. No statistically significant difference in PROMs was observed at 1-year follow-up. The findings of the study suggest that FNS can be regarded as a suitable alternative for internal fixation in young adults (<60 years) with trans-cervical and subcapital FNFs.
5.Retraction: Difference of Neck Shortening in Femoral Neck Fracture between Femoral Neck System and Multiple Cannulated Cancellous Screws: Single Center, Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Saurabh GUPTA ; Abhay ELHENCE ; Sumit BANERJEE ; Sandeep YADAV ; Prabodh KANTIWAL ; Rajesh Kumar RAJNISH ; Pushpinder KHERA ; Rajesh MALHOTRA
Hip & Pelvis 2025;37(1):85-85
6.Difference of Neck Shortening in Femoral Neck Fracture between Femoral Neck System and Multiple Cannulated Cancellous Screws: Single Center, Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Saurabh GUPTA ; Abhay ELHENCE ; Sumit BANERJEE ; Sandeep YADAV ; Prabodh KANTIWAL ; Rajesh Kumar RAJNISH ; Pushpinder KHERA ; Rajesh MALHOTRA
Hip & Pelvis 2024;36(4):310-319
Purpose:
Fracture union after osteosynthesis of a fracture neck femur (FNF) occurs by compression of the fracture ends and potential neck shortening. Selection of an implant for fixation of a femoral fracture of the neck can be challenging when making management decisions. Femoral neck shortening after internal fixation of FNFs using a femoral neck system (FNS) or multiple cannulated cancellous screws (MCS) was compared.
Materials and Methods:
This prospective interventional single-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted at a university teaching hospital. Sixty patients undergoing internal fixation for management of sub-capital or trans-cervical FNFs were randomized and assigned, to one of the two groups—the test group (FNS group) and the control group (MCS group). Primary outcome was determined by measuring the difference in 1-year shortening of the femoral neck on radiographs between FNS and MCS. The secondary objective was to determine the correlation between neck shortening with patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) at the end of the final follow-up.
Results:
At the final follow-up, shortening of the femoral neck was 3.77±1.87 mm in the FNS group, significantly lower compared with the MCS group, 6.53±1.59 mm.
Conclusion
Significantly less shortening of the femoral neck was observed in the FNS group compared with the MCS group. No statistically significant difference in PROMs was observed at 1-year follow-up. The findings of the study suggest that FNS can be regarded as a suitable alternative for internal fixation in young adults (<60 years) with trans-cervical and subcapital FNFs.
7.Retraction: Difference of Neck Shortening in Femoral Neck Fracture between Femoral Neck System and Multiple Cannulated Cancellous Screws: Single Center, Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Saurabh GUPTA ; Abhay ELHENCE ; Sumit BANERJEE ; Sandeep YADAV ; Prabodh KANTIWAL ; Rajesh Kumar RAJNISH ; Pushpinder KHERA ; Rajesh MALHOTRA
Hip & Pelvis 2025;37(1):85-85
8.Cup-Cage Construct Using Porous Cup with Burch-Schneider Cage in the Management of Complex Acetabular Fractures
Rajesh MALHOTRA ; Deepak GAUTAM
Hip & Pelvis 2019;31(2):87-94
PURPOSE: Cup-cage construct technique was developed to address the massive acetabular defects during revision hip arthroplasty. Indications have extended to complex acetabular fractures with pelvic discontinuity necessitating acute total hip arthroplasty. However, its use is constrained in low socioeconomic countries due to non-availability of the original cages from Trabecular Metal Acetabular Revision System and high cost. We used a novel technique using the less expensive Burch-Schneider (BS) cage and Trabecular Metal Revision Shell (TMRS) to address the problem. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed a consecutive series of 8 cases of acetabular fractures reconstructed using a ‘cup-cage construct’ technique using a BS cage along with a TMRS. The mean age of the patients was 61.4 years. Patients were followed up for a mean period of 50.5 months (24 to 72 months). The patients were assessed clinically with Harris Hip Score and radiologically with serial X-rays. RESULTS: All the patients were available at the latest follow up. The mean Harris Hip Score was 87.2. There was no radiological evidence of failure. One patient had dislocation two months following the surgery, which was treated by closed reduction and hip abduction brace. One patient developed an infection at 3 weeks necessitating debridement. The same patient had sciatic nerve palsy that recovered after 4 months. CONCLUSION: This novel technique of the cup-cage construct seems to provide a stable construct at short to midterm follow-up. However, a long-term follow up would be required.
Acetabulum
;
Arthroplasty
;
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
;
Braces
;
Debridement
;
Dislocations
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Hip
;
Humans
;
Sciatic Neuropathy
9.A Randomized Controlled Study to Compare the Total and Hidden Blood Loss in Computer-Assisted Surgery and Conventional Surgical Technique of Total Knee Replacement.
Amit SINGLA ; Rajesh MALHOTRA ; Vijay KUMAR ; Chandra LEKHA ; G KARTHIKEYAN ; Vishwas MALIK
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 2015;7(2):211-216
BACKGROUND: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is associated with considerable blood loss. Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) is different from conventional TKA as it avoids opening the intramedullary canal. Hence, CAS should be associated with less blood loss. METHODS: Fifty-seven patients were randomized into two groups of CAS and conventional TKA. In conventional group intramedullary femoral and extramedullary tibial jigs were used whereas in CAS group imageless navigation system was used. All surgeries were done under tourniquet. Total and hidden blood loss was calculated in both groups and compared. RESULTS: The mean total blood loss was 980 mL in conventional group and 970 mL in CAS group with median of 1,067 mL (range, 59 to 1,791 mL) in conventional group and 863 mL (range, 111 to 2,032 mL) in CAS group. There was no significant difference in total blood loss between the two groups (p = 0.811). We have found significant hidden blood loss in both techniques, which is 54.8% of the total loss in the conventional technique and 59.5% in the computer-assisted navigation technique. CONCLUSIONS: There is no significant difference in total and hidden blood loss in the TKA in CAS and conventional TKA. However, there is significant hidden blood loss in both techniques. There was no relation of tourniquet time with blood loss.
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/*methods
;
Blood Loss, Surgical/*prevention & control/*statistics & numerical data
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Prospective Studies
;
*Surgery, Computer-Assisted
;
Time Factors
;
Tourniquets
10.Extraarticular bony ankylosis in a child with supracondylar fracture of humerus.
Sameer NARANJE ; Ramprasad KANCHERLA ; Arun KANNAN ; Rajesh MALHOTRA ; Lalit SHARMA ; Sukesh Rao SANKINEANI
Chinese Journal of Traumatology 2012;15(5):300-302
Myositis ossificans is defined as formation of bone at the site of injured muscle. It is one of the rare complications of supracondylar fracture of humerus in children. Myositis mass usually develops on the anterior aspect in the brachialis muscle and produces restriction of range of motion, but complete ankylosis is rare. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case to be reported in the literature as a consequence of myositis ossificans traumatica. In this case, a six-year-old child presented to the casualty department with pain in the right elbow after a fall on outstretched hand during play. After surgical excision through the anterior approach, the child had no symptoms referable to the elbow and a residual flexion deformity of 15 degrees with further painless flexion up to 100 degrees at last follow-up of one year after surgery.
Ankylosis
;
Child
;
Elbow Joint
;
Humans
;
Humeral Fractures
;
surgery
;
Humerus
;
Range of Motion, Articular