1.Improving the self-confidence level of medical undergraduates during emergencies using high fidelity simulation
Rajesh Kumar Muniandy ; Khin Khin Nyein ; Felly Maujus
The Medical Journal of Malaysia 2015;70(5):300-302
Introduction: Medical practice involves routinely making
critical decisions regarding patient care and management.
Many factors influence the decision-making process, and
self-confidence has been found to be an important factor in
effective decision-making. With the proper transfer of
knowledge during their undergraduate studies, selfconfidence
levels can be improved. The purpose of this
study was to evaluate the use of High Fidelity Simulation as
a component of medical education to improve the
confidence levels of medical undergraduates during
emergencies.
Methodology: Study participants included a total of 60 final
year medical undergraduates during their rotation in Medical
Senior Posting. They participated in a simulation exercise
using a high fidelity simulator, and their confidence level
measured using a self-administered questionnaire.
Results: The results found that the confidence levels of
‘Assessment of an Emergency Patient’, ‘Diagnosing
Arrhythmias’, ‘Emergency Airway Management’, ‘Performing
Cardio-pulmonary Resuscitation’, ‘Using the Defibrillator’
and ‘Using Emergency Drugs’ showed a statistically
significant increase in confidence levels after the simulation
exercise. The mean confidence levels also rose from 2.85 to
3.83 (p<0.05).
Conclusion: We recommend further use of High Fidelity
Simulation in medical education to improve the confidence
levels of medical undergraduates.
Students, Medical
;
Practice Management, Medical
2.Doctors’ knowledge and attitudes on pain assessment and management in Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah
T. Kumaravadivel Dharmalingam ; Rajesh Kumar Muniandy
The Medical Journal of Malaysia 2020;75(1):68-73
Introduction: Doctors play an important role to assess and
manage pain. Failing to do so properly, pain will affect the
quality of life and increase the length of hospital stay for
patients. In Queen Elizabeth Hospital (QEH), Kota Kinabalu,
Sabah, pain assessment and management programs have
been conducted on a regular basis. However, there has been
no studies to assess the effectiveness of these programs.
Methodology: This is a cross-sectional study to assess the
knowledge and attitude on pain assessment and
management among medical officers at QEH. A universal
sampling technique was used, to represent medical officers
from major clinical departments. The Knowledge and
Attitudes Survey Regarding Pain (KASRP) questionnaire
was used for this study.
Results: A total of 278 questionnaires were distributed to
medical officers. The study sample consisted of 125 females
(44.9%), and 153 males (55.1%). The age group of the
participants ranged from 25 to 41 years old. A 116
respondents scored less than 60% on the knowledge of pain
(41.7%). These findings show there was a deficit in their
knowledge and attitude about pain. There was also a
difference of scores between genders, where the male
doctors performed better than the female doctors. There
was a difference between scores among doctors from
different departments. The highest mean score was from the
department of Anaesthesia (80.2%). There was also a
difference regarding pain knowledge based on the years of
working as a doctor, where the highest passing rate was
from doctors working for more than five years.
Conclusion: This study demonstrated that there is a lack of
knowledge and attitude on pain assessment and
management among QEH medical officers who responded
to this study. This will support the plan on a more aggressive
and continuous education programme to improve pain
assessment and management among doctors in QEH.
3.Family Members’ Satisfaction Levels : Impact Of An Intensive Care Unit Information Leaflet With Verbal Information Compared To Conventional Verbal Information
T Kumaravadivel Dharmalingam ; Narendran Kunasakaran ; Norazian Ahmad Zainuddin ; Rajesh Kumar Muniandy
Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences 2021;17(No.4):134-138
Introduction: Patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) experience intense physical stress. Family members
of these patients also experience stress during the admission. Therefore, it is an important task of the ICU staff to
provide the family members with appropriate and clear information. There are many methods to do this. This study
aimed to compare the impact of two methods of information sharing on the satisfaction levels among families of ICU
patients. The novel method being introduced and investigated was a locally designed information leaflet in combination
with verbal explanation. This new method was compared with the traditional method of verbal explanation
only. Methods: This was a randomized controlled study, conducted at the ICU of Teluk Intan Hospital. A total of 60
participants were enrolled, with 30 participants each in the intervention and control group. The Malay version of the
Validated Critical Care Family Satisfaction Survey (CCFSS) was used to measure family satisfaction with the care received
during their ICU admission. Results: The intervention group reported significantly higher level of satisfaction
in all of the components (Assurance, Proximity, Information, Support and Comfort). Upon further examination of the
results of the intervention group, the scores in the Assurance, Proximity and Comfort component were significantly
higher compared to the scores in the Information and Support component. Conclusion: Integrating an information
leaflet with the traditional verbal method of delivering information has proven to provide a significant difference in
satisfaction levels to the family members of patients who were admitted to the ICU.