2.Safety Profile, Feasibility and Early Clinical Outcome of Cotransplantation of Olfactory Mucosa and Bone Marrow Stem Cells in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury Patients.
Vijay G GONI ; Rajesh CHHABRA ; Ashok GUPTA ; Neelam MARWAHA ; Mandeep S DHILLON ; Sudesh PEBAM ; Nirmal Raj GOPINATHAN ; Shashidhar BANGALORE KANTHARAJANNA
Asian Spine Journal 2014;8(4):484-490
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective case series. PURPOSE: To study the safety and feasibility of cotransplantation of bone marrow stem cells and autologous olfactory mucosa in chronic spinal cord injury. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Stem cell therapies are a novel method in the attempt to restitute heavily damaged tissues. We discuss our experience with this modality in postspinal cord injury paraplegics. METHODS: The study includes 9 dorsal spine injury patients with American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) A neurological impairment who underwent de-tethering of the spinal cord followed by cotransplantation with bone marrow stem cells and an olfactory mucosal graft. Participants were evaluated at the baseline and at 6 monthly intervals. Safety and tolerability were evaluated through the monitoring for adverse events and magnetic resonance imaging evaluation. Efficacy assessment was done through neurological and functional outcome measures. RESULTS: Surgery was tolerated well by all participants. No significant difference in the ASIA score was observed, although differences in the Functional Independence Measure and Modified Ashworth Scale were statistically significant. No significant complication was observed in any of our patients, except for neurogenic pain in one participant. The follow-up magnetic resonance imaging evaluation revealed an increase in the length of myelomalacia in seven participants. CONCLUSIONS: The cotransplantation of bone marrow stem cells and olfactory mucosa is a safe, feasible and viable procedure in AIS A participants with thoracic level injuries, as assessed at the 24-month follow-up. No efficacy could be demonstrated. For application, further large-scale multicenter studies are needed.
Asia
;
Bone Marrow*
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Humans
;
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
;
Olfactory Mucosa*
;
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
;
Prospective Studies
;
Spinal Cord
;
Spinal Cord Injuries*
;
Spinal Cord Regeneration
;
Spinal Injuries
;
Spine
;
Stem Cells*
;
Thorax
;
Transplants
3.Validation Study of Rajasekaran’s Kyphosis Classification System: Do We Clearly Understand Single- and Two-Column Deficiencies?
Ajoy Prasad SHETTY ; Rajesh RAJAVELU ; Vibhu Krishnan VISWANATHAN ; Kota WATANABE ; Harvinder Singh CHHABRA ; Rishi Mukesh KANNA ; Jason Pui Yin CHEUNG ; Yong HAI ; Mun Keong KWAN ; Chung Chek WONG ; Gabriel LIU ; Saumajit BASU ; Abhay NENE ; J. NARESH-BABU ; Bhavuk GARG
Asian Spine Journal 2020;14(4):475-488
Methods:
A total of 30 sets of images, including plain radiographs, computed tomography scans, and magnetic resonance imaging scans, were randomly selected from our hospital patient database. All patients had undergone deformity correction surgery for kyphosis. Twelve spine surgeons from the Asia-Pacific region (six different countries) independently evaluated and classified the deformity types and proposed their surgical recommendations. This information was then compared with standard deformity classification and surgical recommendations.
Results:
The kappa coefficients for the classification were as follows: 0.88 for type 1A, 0.78 for type 1B, 0.50 for type 2B, 0.40 for type 3A, 0.63 for type 3B, and 0.86 for type 3C deformities. The overall kappa coefficient for the classification was 0.68. Regarding the repeatability of osteotomy recommendations, kappa values were the highest for Ponte’s (Schwab type 2) osteotomy (kappa 0.8). Kappa values for other osteotomy recommendations were 0.52 for pedicle subtraction/disc-bone osteotomy (Schwab type 3/4), 0.42 for vertebral column resection (VCR, type 5), and 0.30 for multilevel VCRs (type 6).
Conclusions
Excellent accuracy was found for types 1A, 1B, and 3C deformities (ends of spectrum). There was more variation among surgeons in differentiating between one-column (types 2A and 2B) and two-column (types 3A and 3B) deficiencies, as surgeons often failed to recognize the radiological signs of posterior column failure. This failure to identify column deficiencies can potentially alter kyphosis management. There was excellent consensus among surgeons in the recommendation of type 2 osteotomy; however, some variation was observed in their choice for other osteotomies.