Moyamoya disease is a rare clinical disorder, characterized by chronic, progressive occlusion of supraclinoid internal carotid artery and proximal portions of the anterior and middle cerebral arteries, and consequent development of collateral vessels seen on imaging as puff of smoke appearance. Although the pathophysiology is unclear, various hematologic disorders have been associated with development of the moyamoya syndrome. We report a case of moyamoya syndrome in a 3 yr old girl who presented with recurrent ischemic strokes. The angiography was suggestive of moyamoya syndrome. The serum vitamin B12 level was remarkably low with bone marrow picture of megaloblastic anemia. There was also hyperhomocysteinemia. Moyamoya syndrome has not been previously reported to be associated with vitamin B12 defi ciency. We propose that vitamin B12 defi ciency with hyperhomocysteinemia could result in greater risk for arterial thrombosis and thus caused the moyamoya syndrome in our patient

Purpose: Fracture union after osteosynthesis of a fracture neck femur (FNF) occurs by compression of the fracture ends and potential neck shortening. Selection of an implant for fixation of a femoral fracture of the neck can be challenging when making management decisions. Femoral neck shortening after internal fixation of FNFs using a femoral neck system (FNS) or multiple cannulated cancellous screws (MCS) was compared. Materials and Methods: This prospective interventional single-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted at a university teaching hospital. Sixty patients undergoing internal fixation for management of sub-capital or trans-cervical FNFs were randomized and assigned, to one of the two groups—the test group (FNS group) and the control group (MCS group). Primary outcome was determined by measuring the difference in 1-year shortening of the femoral neck on radiographs between FNS and MCS. The secondary objective was to determine the correlation between neck shortening with patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) at the end of the final follow-up. Results: At the final follow-up, shortening of the femoral neck was 3.77±1.87 mm in the FNS group, significantly lower compared with the MCS group, 6.53±1.59 mm. Conclusion Significantly less shortening of the femoral neck was observed in the FNS group compared with the MCS group. No statistically significant difference in PROMs was observed at 1-year follow-up. The findings of the study suggest that FNS can be regarded as a suitable alternative for internal fixation in young adults (<60 years) with trans-cervical and subcapital FNFs.

Purpose: Fracture union after osteosynthesis of a fracture neck femur (FNF) occurs by compression of the fracture ends and potential neck shortening. Selection of an implant for fixation of a femoral fracture of the neck can be challenging when making management decisions. Femoral neck shortening after internal fixation of FNFs using a femoral neck system (FNS) or multiple cannulated cancellous screws (MCS) was compared. Materials and Methods: This prospective interventional single-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted at a university teaching hospital. Sixty patients undergoing internal fixation for management of sub-capital or trans-cervical FNFs were randomized and assigned, to one of the two groups—the test group (FNS group) and the control group (MCS group). Primary outcome was determined by measuring the difference in 1-year shortening of the femoral neck on radiographs between FNS and MCS. The secondary objective was to determine the correlation between neck shortening with patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) at the end of the final follow-up. Results: At the final follow-up, shortening of the femoral neck was 3.77±1.87 mm in the FNS group, significantly lower compared with the MCS group, 6.53±1.59 mm. Conclusion Significantly less shortening of the femoral neck was observed in the FNS group compared with the MCS group. No statistically significant difference in PROMs was observed at 1-year follow-up. The findings of the study suggest that FNS can be regarded as a suitable alternative for internal fixation in young adults (<60 years) with trans-cervical and subcapital FNFs.

Purpose: Fracture union after osteosynthesis of a fracture neck femur (FNF) occurs by compression of the fracture ends and potential neck shortening. Selection of an implant for fixation of a femoral fracture of the neck can be challenging when making management decisions. Femoral neck shortening after internal fixation of FNFs using a femoral neck system (FNS) or multiple cannulated cancellous screws (MCS) was compared. Materials and Methods: This prospective interventional single-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted at a university teaching hospital. Sixty patients undergoing internal fixation for management of sub-capital or trans-cervical FNFs were randomized and assigned, to one of the two groups—the test group (FNS group) and the control group (MCS group). Primary outcome was determined by measuring the difference in 1-year shortening of the femoral neck on radiographs between FNS and MCS. The secondary objective was to determine the correlation between neck shortening with patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) at the end of the final follow-up. Results: At the final follow-up, shortening of the femoral neck was 3.77±1.87 mm in the FNS group, significantly lower compared with the MCS group, 6.53±1.59 mm. Conclusion Significantly less shortening of the femoral neck was observed in the FNS group compared with the MCS group. No statistically significant difference in PROMs was observed at 1-year follow-up. The findings of the study suggest that FNS can be regarded as a suitable alternative for internal fixation in young adults (<60 years) with trans-cervical and subcapital FNFs.

Background: Anteromedial osteoarthritis is a recognized indication for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Favorable postoperative outcomes largely depend on proper patient selection, correct implant positioning, and limb alignment. Computer navigation has a proven value over conventional systems in reducing mechanical errors in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the lack of strong evidence impedes the universal use of computer navigation technology in UKA. Therefore, this study was proposed to investigate the accuracy of component positioning and limb alignment in computer navigated UKA and to observe the role of navigation in proper patient selection. Methods: A total of 50 knees (38 patients) underwent computer navigated UKA between 2016 and 2018. All operations were performed by the senior surgeon using the same navigation system and implant type. The navigation system was used as a tool to aid patient selection: knees with preoperative residual varus > 5° on valgus stress and hyperextension > 10° were switched to navigated TKA. We measured the accuracy of component placement in sagittal and coronal planes on postoperative radiographs. Functional outcomes were also evaluated at the final follow-up (a minimum of 16 months). Results: Nine patients had tibia vara and 14 patients had preoperative hyperextension deformity. We observed coronal outliers for the tibial component in 12% knees and for the femoral component in 10% knees. We also observed sagittal outliers for the tibial component in 14% knees and for the femoral component in 6% knees. There was a significant improvement in the functional score at the final follow-up. On multiple linear regression, no difference was found in functional scores of knees with or without tibia vara (p = 0.16) and with or without hyperextension (p = 0.25). Conclusions Our study further validates the role of computer navigation in desirable implant positioning and limb alignment. We encourage use of computer-assisted navigation as a tool for patient selection, as it allows intraoperative dynamic goniometry and provides real-time kinematic behavior of the knee to obviate pitfalls such as significant residual varus angulation and hyperextension that predispose early failure of UKA.

Background: Young age in osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) demands bone-preserving, short-stem arthroplasty. Several designs including neck-preserving stems and neck-resecting, shortened, standard stems are classified as short stems. There is a paucity of literature investigating risk factors and outcomes of intraoperative complications of neck preserving, short-stem arthroplasty in ONFH. Methods: A total of 107 hips operated with METHA short-stem arthroplasty for ONFH were retrospectively evaluated. The mean age of patients was 43.7 years (range, 27–60 years). Nine patients had an intraoperative fracture. Seven hips received prophylactic cerclage wiring for poor bone quality. Patients were invited for clinical and radiological evaluation at the latest follow-up. Results: The mean follow-up of patients was 47.2 months. Significant association with intraoperative fractures and the need for prophylactic cerclage wiring were found in steroids-, alcohol-, and chronic renal failure-induced ONFH. However, patient sex, body mass index, traumatic/idiopathic ONFH, previous implant in situ, prosthesis size, and single-sitting bilateral total hip replacement (THA) were not the risk factors. All hips showed signs of osteointegration at final follow-up. No revision was done during the study period for any cause. Conclusions METHA short-stem THA offers excellent functional and radiological outcomes in ONFH. However, precaution must be exercised in patients with steroids-, alcohol-, and renal disorders-induced ONFN due to poor bone quality and higher chances of intraoperative fractures. Also, additional measures such as the use of a high-speed burr and prophylactic cerclage wiring in ONFH may allow predictable and safe use of short stems.

Purpose: Due to COVID 19 pandemic, the treatment of cancer patients has become a dilemma for every oncologist. Cancer patients are at an increased risk of immunosuppression and have a higher risk to acquire any infection. There are individual experiences from some centers regarding the management of cancer patients during such a crisis. So we have developed our institutional strategy to balance between COVID and cancer management.Material & Methods: Radiation Oncology departmental meeting was held to prepare a consensus document on Radiotherapy schedules and department functioning during this pandemic. Results: Strategies were taken in form of following areas were steps need to be taken to decrease risk of infection, categorise treatment on the basis of priority, radiotherapy schedules modification, academic meetings and management of COVID positive patient/personnel in Radiation Oncology department. Conclusion We hope to strike the balance in overcoming both the battles and emerge as winners. Stringent long term follow up will be done for assessing the response or any unforeseen treatment related sequelae.