1.Setup Error and Effectiveness of Weekly Image-Guided Radiation Therapy of TomoDirect for Early Breast Cancer.
Mi Joo CHUNG ; Guk Jin LEE ; Young Jin SUH ; Hyo Chun LEE ; Sea Won LEE ; Songmi JEONG ; Jeong Won LEE ; Sung Hwan KIM ; Dae Gyu KANG ; Jong Hoon LEE
Cancer Research and Treatment 2015;47(4):774-780
PURPOSE: This study investigated setup error and effectiveness of weekly image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) of TomoDirect for early breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and fifty-one breasts of 147 consecutive patients who underwent breast conserving surgery followed by whole breast irradiation using TomoDirect in 2012 and 2013 were evaluated. All patients received weekly IGRT. The weekly setup errors from simulation to each treatment in reference to chest wall and surgical clips were measured. Random, systemic, and 3-dimensional setup errors were assessed. Extensive setup error was defined as 5 mm above the margin in any directions. RESULTS: All mean errors were within 3 mm of all directions. The mean angle of gantry shifts was 0.6degrees. The mean value of absolute 3-dimensional setup error was 4.67 mm. In multivariate analysis, breast size (odds ratio, 2.82; 95% confidence interval, 1.00 to 7.90) was a significant factor for extensive error. The largest significant deviation of setup error was observed in the first week of radiotherapy (p < 0.001) and the deviations gradually decreased with time. The deviation of setup error was 5.68 mm in the first week and within 5 mm after the second week. CONCLUSION: In this study, there was a significant association between breast size and significant setup error in breast cancer patients who received TomoDirect. The largest deviation occurred in the first week of treatment. Therefore, patients with large breasts should be closely observed on every fraction and fastidious attention is required in the first fraction of IGRT.
Breast Neoplasms*
;
Breast*
;
Humans
;
Mastectomy, Segmental
;
Multivariate Analysis
;
Radiotherapy
;
Radiotherapy Setup Errors
;
Radiotherapy, Image-Guided*
;
Surgical Instruments
;
Thoracic Wall
2.Analysis of setup error in the head and neck cancer radiotherapy using cone-beam CT scanning.
Sisi JIANG ; Yiyan QU ; Penggang BAI ; Qixin LI ; Chuanben CHEN ; Libin LIU ; Zhaodong FEI
Journal of Biomedical Engineering 2012;29(5):851-854
Cone-beam CT (CBCT) of Elekta can be used to analyze the setup errors in intensity modulated radiotherapy. A total of 240 patients with head and neck cancer were chosen in the period from October, 2009 to October, 2010. Their CBCT images were obtained after initial setup, and registered to the planning CT images, and then the setup errors on translational directions (X, Y, Z) and on rotational directions (U, V, W) were obtained and analyzed. The results showed that the setup errors on translational directions in Y-axis and Z-axis were larger than in X-axis, and the setup errors on rotational directions in Y-axis was much more obvious than those on the other two directions, which should be taken care during the patient daily setup. It may be concluded that the CBCT system can improve the precision for radiotherapy.
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
;
methods
;
Head and Neck Neoplasms
;
diagnostic imaging
;
radiotherapy
;
Humans
;
Radiotherapy Setup Errors
;
prevention & control
;
statistics & numerical data
;
Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated
3.Primary study of the threatening of unfixed planning of image guided radiotherapy to the volume margin of neck tumor.
Yanlong WU ; Renming ZHONG ; Yingjie ZHANG ; Zhihui LIU ; Guangjun LI ; Sen BAI
Journal of Biomedical Engineering 2013;30(3):503-507
Some patients who have neck tumor but cannot tolerate the thermoplastic immobilization may be supported by simple cushions, and are marked on the neck skin during CT simulation. We therefore set 5 mm as the spinal cord-planning risk volume margin in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans in our Centre. Cone beam CT (CBCT) scans were acquired for three times, and matched with the simulation CT images in each radiotherapy. The mean and the standard deviation of the individual, the root mean-square and the standard deviation of the individual were calculated. The matched results of the third CBCT were used to calculate the spinal cord- planning risk volume margin. The results showed that the interfraction error was significantly reduced and the intrafraction error was stable by CBCT guiding. CBCT and 5 mm spinal cord-planning organ is feasible and safe without threatening volume margin to high dose radiotherapy for the patients with neck tumor and not able to tolerate thermoplastic immobilization.
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
;
Head and Neck Neoplasms
;
diagnostic imaging
;
radiotherapy
;
Humans
;
Patient Positioning
;
methods
;
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
;
methods
;
Radiotherapy Setup Errors
;
prevention & control
;
Radiotherapy, Image-Guided
;
methods
;
Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated
;
instrumentation
;
methods