OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy and safety of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in children with high-risk neuroblastoma (NB). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on the medical data of 24 children with high-risk NB who were diagnosed and treated with IMRT in the Department of Hematology and Oncology, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, from April 2018 to December 2020. The medical data included age, radiotherapy dose, times of radiotherapy, laboratory examination results, adverse reactions, and survival. RESULTS: All 24 children (14 boys and 10 girls) received IMRT, with a mean age of (65±23) months and a median age of 59 months. The primary tumor was located in the abdomen in 23 children and 1 child had primary tumor in the mediastinum. The median age was 41.5 months at the time of radiotherapy. The radiation dose of radiotherapy ranged from 14.4 to 36.0 Gy, with a mean dose of (22±3) Gy and a daily dose of 1.8-2.0 Gy. The radiotherapy was performed for a total number of 8-20 times, with a mean number of 11.9 times. Among these children, 6 received radiotherapy for the residual or metastatic lesion. Of all the 23 children, 3 experienced cough, 2 experienced diarrhea, and 1 experienced vomiting during radiotherapy. At 2 weeks after radiotherapy, serum creatinine ranged from 2.3 to 70.1 μmol/L and alanine aminotransferase ranged from 9.1 to 65.3 μ/L. Ten children experienced grade Ⅲ bone marrow suppression and 2 experienced grade Ⅳ bone marrow suppression 1 to 2 weeks after radiotherapy. Four children experienced grade Ⅲ bone marrow suppression and 1 experienced grade Ⅳ bone marrow suppression 3 to 4 weeks after radiotherapy. During a median follow-up time of 13.5 months, 23 children (96%) achieved stable disease and 1 died. Up to the follow-up date, second malignant tumor or abnormal organ function was not observed. CONCLUSIONS IMRT can improve the local control rate of NB. IMRT appears to be safe in the treatment of children with NB.
Child ; Child, Preschool ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Neuroblastoma/radiotherapy* ; Radiotherapy Dosage ; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/adverse effects* ; Retrospective Studies

BACKGROUNDFew studies were reported on the comparison of clinical outcomes between intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) in the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). This study aimed to determine whether IMRT improves clinical outcomes compared with 3D-CRT in patients with GBM.

METHODSThe records of 54 patients with newly-diagnosed GBM from July 2009 to December 2010 were reviewed. The patients underwent postoperative IMRT or 3D-CRT with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide. Kaplan-Meier method and log rank test were used to estimate differences of patients' survival.

RESULTSThe median follow-up was 13 months. Of the 54 patients, fifty (92.6%) completed the combined modality treatment. The 1-year overall survival rate (OS) was 79.6%. The pattern of failure was predominantly local. A comparative analysis revealed that no statistical difference was observed between the IMRT group (n = 21) and the 3D-CRT group (n = 33) for 1-year OS (89.6% vs. 75.8%, P = 0.795), or 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) (61.0% vs. 45.5%, P = 0.867). In dosimetric comparison, IMRT seemed to allow better sparing of organs at risk than 3D-CRT did (P = 0.050, P = 0.055). However, there was no significant difference for toxicities of irradiation between the IMRT group and the 3D-CRT group.

CONCLUSIONSOur preliminary results suggested that delivering standard radiation doses by IMRT is unlikely to improve local control or overall survival for GBM compared with 3D-CRT. Given this lack of survival benefit and increased costs of IMRT, the utilization of IMRT treatment for GBM needs to be carefully rationalized.

Adult ; Aged ; Brain Neoplasms ; mortality ; radiotherapy ; Female ; Glioblastoma ; mortality ; radiotherapy ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Radiotherapy, Conformal ; adverse effects ; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated ; adverse effects ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVE: To compare the side effects of intensity modulated radiotherapy(IMRT) and conventional radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. METHOD: Sixty nine cases of nasopharyngeal carcinoma were random selected by stages,with 32 cases in IMRT group and 37 cases in conventional radiotherapy group. The target areas in IMRT group were nasopharyngeal carcinoma, parapharyngeal space and neck lymphatic area with the fractional dose of 2.00-2.12 Gy per time, for 33-35 times. The cases in conventional radiotherapy group were given facio-cervical field radiation, DT 40-60 Gy per time, for 20-30 times. The reinforcing dosage in lateral facial field increased to DT 70 Gy in the nasopharyngeal area. The prophylactic irradiation dose of the neck was DT 50-55 Gy. RESULT: The incidence of dry mouth one year after radiotherapy in the IMRT and conventional radiotherapy groups were 9.38% (3/32) and 94.59% (35/37) respectively, with a significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.01). The incidence of difficulty in opening mouth in the IMRT and conventional radiotherapy groups were 6.25% (2/32) and 72.97% (27/37) respectively, with a significant difference between the two groups(P < 0.01). CONCLUSION Compared with the conventional radiotherapy, IMRT may improve the control rate and obviously de creases the side effects. It could be recommended for the radiotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Adult ; Carcinoma ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma ; Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms ; radiotherapy ; Radiotherapy ; adverse effects ; methods ; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated ; adverse effects

The influence of the position and radiation technique on the organs at risk (OARs) in radiotherapy of rectal cancer was evaluated. The relationship between the volume of irradiated small bowel (VSB) and acute bowel toxicity was determined. A total of 97 cases of rectal cancer were retrospectively randomized to receive radiotherapy with the designated treatment positions and radiation plans. Among 64 patients in the supine position, 32 patients were given three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCR) and 32 patients were subjected to intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) respectively. The rest 33 patients were treated with 3DCRT in the prone position with a belly board. The VSB was calculated for doses from 5 to 45 Gy at an interval of 5 Gy. With prescription dose in planned target volume (PTV) of 50 Gy, the dose distribution, conformal index for PTV (CI), dose-volume histogram (DVH) of OARs, the correlation of VSB and the acute toxicity were compared. The results were shown as follows: (1) Among the 3 methods, there were no differences in PTV's converge including V95 and D95; (2) For IMRT under a supine position, CIwas closest to 1, the mean dose of small bowel decreased (P<0.05), and the mean VSB from V30 to V45 significantly decreased (P<0.05). (3) For 3DCRT with a belly board under a prone position, the mean dose and the mean VSB from 40 to 45 Gy were less than those for 3DCRT under a supine position (P<0.05); (4) Mean proportion of VSB was significantly greater in the patients experiencing diarrhea grade 2-4 than in those with diarrhea grade 0-1 at dose levels from V30 to V45 (P<0.05). It was concluded that for the radiotherapy of rectal cancer, IMRT technique might decrease the high-dose VSB to reduce the risk of acute injury. 3DCRT with a belly board under a prone position is superior to 3DCRT under a supine position, which could be a second choice for radiation of rectal cancer.
Female ; Humans ; Intestine, Small ; pathology ; radiation effects ; Male ; Organs at Risk ; pathology ; radiation effects ; Prone Position ; Radiotherapy Dosage ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted ; Radiotherapy, Conformal ; adverse effects ; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated ; adverse effects ; Rectal Neoplasms ; pathology ; radiotherapy ; Urinary Bladder ; pathology ; radiation effects

PURPOSE: The validity of tomotherapy-based simultaneous integrated boost (TOMOSIB) was assessed in terms of acute intestinal/urinary toxicity by comparing with 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) in cases of whole-pelvis radiation therapy (WPRT) for prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight consecutive patients who underwent curative WPRT were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty six (68.4%) received 3DCRT and the others (31.6%) were treated with TOMOSIB. A local boost to the prostate circumferential area was added to WPRT sequentially for 3DCRT and concomitantly for TOMOSIB. The total median prostate or prostatic bed dose was 64.8 Gy including median 45.0 Gy of WPRT. Acute toxicities were assessed according to RTOG criteria. RESULTS: Overall intestinal toxicity was lower in TOMOSIB group than 3DCRT group (p=0.008). When it was divided into rectum and non-rectum intestine (NRI), TOMOSIB showed borderline superiority only in NRI toxicity (p=0.047). For the urinary toxicity, there was no significant difference between two groups (p=0.796). On dosimetric analysis for the rectum and bladder, dose delivered to 80% (p<0.001) and volume receiving 25-40 Gy (p<0.001) were remarkably higher in 3DCRT. For the NRI, only maximum dose showed significant results between two groups (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Intestinal toxicity should be verified with more detailed anatomic categorization such as rectum and NRI. TOMOSIB could not reduce urinary toxicity because of inevitably high dose exposure to the prostatic urethra. Current dosimetry system did not properly reflect intestinal/urinary toxicity, and suitable dosimetric guidelines are needed in TOMOSIB.
Adenocarcinoma/pathology/*radiotherapy ; Aged ; Humans ; Intestine, Small/*radiation effects ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pelvis/*radiation effects ; Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology/*radiotherapy ; Radiation Injuries ; Radiotherapy Dosage ; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/*adverse effects/methods ; Rectum/radiation effects ; Retrospective Studies ; Urinary Bladder/*radiation effects

PURPOSE: The validity of tomotherapy-based simultaneous integrated boost (TOMOSIB) was assessed in terms of acute intestinal/urinary toxicity by comparing with 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) in cases of whole-pelvis radiation therapy (WPRT) for prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight consecutive patients who underwent curative WPRT were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty six (68.4%) received 3DCRT and the others (31.6%) were treated with TOMOSIB. A local boost to the prostate circumferential area was added to WPRT sequentially for 3DCRT and concomitantly for TOMOSIB. The total median prostate or prostatic bed dose was 64.8 Gy including median 45.0 Gy of WPRT. Acute toxicities were assessed according to RTOG criteria. RESULTS: Overall intestinal toxicity was lower in TOMOSIB group than 3DCRT group (p=0.008). When it was divided into rectum and non-rectum intestine (NRI), TOMOSIB showed borderline superiority only in NRI toxicity (p=0.047). For the urinary toxicity, there was no significant difference between two groups (p=0.796). On dosimetric analysis for the rectum and bladder, dose delivered to 80% (p<0.001) and volume receiving 25-40 Gy (p<0.001) were remarkably higher in 3DCRT. For the NRI, only maximum dose showed significant results between two groups (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Intestinal toxicity should be verified with more detailed anatomic categorization such as rectum and NRI. TOMOSIB could not reduce urinary toxicity because of inevitably high dose exposure to the prostatic urethra. Current dosimetry system did not properly reflect intestinal/urinary toxicity, and suitable dosimetric guidelines are needed in TOMOSIB.
Adenocarcinoma/pathology/*radiotherapy ; Aged ; Humans ; Intestine, Small/*radiation effects ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pelvis/*radiation effects ; Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology/*radiotherapy ; Radiation Injuries ; Radiotherapy Dosage ; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/*adverse effects/methods ; Rectum/radiation effects ; Retrospective Studies ; Urinary Bladder/*radiation effects

OBJECTIVETo compare the radiation injuries of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) following three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

METHODSThirty-nine NPC patients without previous radiotherapy underwent 3D-CRT and another 32 received IMRT in our institute. The distance between the 2 dens incisivus medialis (DDIM) and LENT SOMA criteria were employed to evaluate TMJ injuries, clinical outcomes, and the performance-to-price ratios.

RESULTSThe short-term local response rates were similar between the two groups (P=0.878). The mean radiation doses of the TMJ were significantly higher in 3D-CRT group than in IMRT group (57.06 vs 40.90 Gy, P<0.001). The DDIM showed significant changes in 3D-CRT groups after the radiotherapy (P<0.05). No significant difference was found in the TMJ injuries between the two groups according to the SOMA criteria (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONRadiation injuries of the TMJ are tolerable in both 3D-CRT and IMRT groups, and 3D-CRT is a more economic choice for patients who can not afford IMRT.

Carcinoma ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms ; radiotherapy ; Radiation Injuries ; etiology ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted ; Radiotherapy, Conformal ; adverse effects ; methods ; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated ; adverse effects ; methods ; Temporomandibular Joint ; injuries

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is considered the treatment option for locally advanced pancreatic cancer, but accompanying gastrointestinal toxicities are the most common complication. With the introduction of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3-D CRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), CCRT-related adverse events are expected to diminish. Here, we evaluated the benefits of radiation modalities by comparing gastrointestinal toxicities between 3-D CRT and IMRT. METHODS: Patients who received CCRT between July 2010 and June 2012 in Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, were enrolled prospectively. The patients underwent upper endoscopy before and 1 month after CCRT. RESULTS: A total of 84 patients were enrolled during the study period. The radiotherapy modalities delivered included 3D-CRT (n=40) and IMRT (n=44). The median follow-up period from the start of CCRT was 10.6 months (range, 3.8 to 29.9 months). The symptoms of dyspepsia, nausea/vomiting, and diarrhea did not differ between the groups. Upper endoscopy revealed significantly more gastroduodenal ulcers in the 3-D CRT group (p=0.003). The modality of radiotherapy (3D-CRT; odds ratio [OR], 11.67; p=0.011) and tumor location (body of pancreas; OR, 11.06; p=0.009) were risk factors for gastrointestinal toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: IMRT is associated with significantly fewer gastroduodenal injuries among patients treated with CCRT for pancreatic cancer.
Aged ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gastrointestinal Diseases/*etiology ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pancreatic Neoplasms/*radiotherapy ; Prospective Studies ; Radiation Injuries/*complications ; Radiotherapy, Conformal/*adverse effects ; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/*adverse effects ; Risk Factors

OBJECTIVE: To observe the effect of adaptive replanning on adverse reactions and clinical outcome of nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated by helical tomotherapy. METHODS: Fifty nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated by TomoTherapy system were retrospectively analyzed. Among these patients, 25 received repetitive CT simulation and replanning, and another 25 case-matched control patients without replanning were identified by matching age, gender, pathological type, UICC stage, weight loss, etc. Wilcoxon test was used to evaluate the effect of replanning on acute and chronic radiation reactions within individuals. Kaplan-Meier study was used to estimate the survival of patients with or without replanning. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in late salivary grand damage between the replanning and the control group (P=0.046), while no difference was observed in acute or other late side effects between the two groups. The median follow-up of the two groups was 32 months (7-42 months) and 26 months (8-46 months), respectively. The median local relapse-free survival time, 2-year local relapse-free survival and 2-year lymphnode relapse-free survival in the two groups were similar (36 months, 92% and 100%). No significant difference was found in the 2-year metastasis relapsefree survival (80% and 96%) and the 2-year overall survival between the two groups (88% and 92%, P>0.05). CONCLUSION Adaptive replanning may reduce the severity of late damage of salivary glands after helical tomotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients without improvement of 2-year survival rate.
Adult ; Carcinoma ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell ; radiotherapy ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma ; Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms ; radiotherapy ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted ; methods ; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated ; adverse effects ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Rate ; Treatment Outcome

Postradiation nasopharyngeal necrosis is an important late effect of radiotherapy that affects prognosis in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. In the present study, we reviewed the clinical and imaging features of 67 patients with pathologically diagnosed postradiation nasopharyngeal necrosis who were treated at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between June 2006 and January 2010. Their clinical manifestations, endoscopic findings, and imaging features were analyzed. Early nasopharyngeal necrosis was limited to a local site in the nasopharyngeal region, and the tissue defect was not obvious, whereas deep parapharyngeal ulcer or signs of osteoradionecrosis in the basilar region was observed in serious cases. Those with osteoradionecrosis and/or exposed carotid artery had a high mortality. In conclusion, Postradiation nasopharyngeal necrosis has characteristic magnetic resonance imaging appearances, which associate well with clinical findings, but pathologic examination is essential to make the diagnosis.
Adult ; Aged ; Carcinoma ; Female ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms ; radiotherapy ; Nasopharynx ; pathology ; radiation effects ; Necrosis ; Osteoradionecrosis ; diagnosis ; etiology ; Radiation Injuries ; diagnosis ; etiology ; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated ; adverse effects