No abstract available.
Abdominal Pain/etiology ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde/*adverse effects ; Female ; Humans ; Ileal Diseases/etiology/radiography/surgery ; Intestinal Obstruction/*etiology/radiography/surgery ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Treatment Outcome

A double gallbladder is a condition that arises during the fetal period due to the abnormal differentiation of presumptive gallbladder cells, which causes two separate gallbladders, each with their own cystic duct. Most cases are diagnosed incidentally during surgery. Detailed preoperative investigations (ultrasound, oral cholecystography, intravenous cholangiography, CT, ERCP and MRCP) are required for an accurate preoperative diagnosis before considering a cholecystectomy to avoid inadvertent damage to the biliary ductal system and to overlook the second gallbladder during surgery. A total cholecystectomy, with removal of both gallbladders, should be the appropriate treatment for a double gallbladder to avoid complications and a reoperation. We report a patient with an accessory gallbladder, originating from right hepatic duct, and also discuss the characeristics of this rare anomaly.
Cholangiography ; Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde ; Cholecystectomy ; Cholecystography ; Cystic Duct ; Diagnosis ; Gallbladder* ; Hepatic Duct, Common* ; Humans ; Reoperation

PURPOSE: The role of plain, abdominal radiography in childhood constipation has not been fully evaluated. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy and reliability of scoring systems assessing a fecal load on plain, abdominal radiographs in children with functional constipation. METHODS: Plain, abdominal radiographs from 38 constipated children and 39 control children were examined by four independent inspectors, pediatric residents. Four inspectors independently scored the radiographs according to three different scoring systems Barr, Blethyn, and Leech. No clinical information about the patients was available to the inspectors. Each abdominal radiograph was evaluated on two separate occasions, one week apart. Kappa coefficients were calculated as indicators of inter-and intra-inspector variability, coefficients < 0.20, 0.21~0.40, 0.40~0.60, 0.60, 0.61~0.80 and 0.81~1.00 were considered to indicate poor, fair, moderate, good, and very good agreement, respectively. RESULTS: The Leech score showed the highest reproducibility: the inter-inspector agreement was uniformly very good on two separate occasions (kappa values of 0.88, 0.91, 0.92, 0.86 in the first time and 0.81, 0.88, 0.89, 0.84 in the second time). Agreement using the Barr score was good (kappa values of 0.66, 0.67, 0.69, 0.66 in the first time and 0.68, 0.65, 0.71, 0.68 in the second time). However, agreement for the Blethyn score was the lowest of the three scoring systems. The Leech scoring system had the highest sensitivity and specificity compared to the Barr scoring system for the diagnosis of functional constipation by plain, abdominal radiographs. CONCLUSION: The Leech score appeared to be a more accurate and reliable method because of its high sensitivity and specificity for evaluating the fecal load on plain, abdominal radiographs in children with functional constipation. Therefore, the Leech scoring system was found to be the most useful for assessment for the degree of constipation on plain, abdominal radiographs in children.
Child ; Constipation* ; Diagnosis ; Humans ; Radiography ; Radiography, Abdominal ; Sensitivity and Specificity

Plain X-ray radiographs are the first line of investigation taken in the diagnosis of abdominal pathology and are considered an important diagnostic tool to provide guidelines for further imaging studies and comprehensive therapeutic management. Although most abdominal pathology demonstrates non-specific radiologic findings, the plain abdominal radiography is very useful in specific diseases, including certain gastrointestinal anomalies. This review provides image findings of normal plain abdominal radiography and some common abdominal pathology in infants and children.
Child ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Radiography, Abdominal

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic value of plain abdominal radiography in stroke patients with bowel dysfunction. METHODS: A total of 59 stroke patients were recruited and assigned into constipation or non-constipation group. Patients were interviewed to obtain clinical information, constipation score, and Bristol stool form scale. The total and segmental colon transit time (CTT) was measured using radio-opaque markers (Kolomark). The degree of stool retention was evaluated by plain abdominal radiography and scored by two different methods (Starreveld score and Leech score). The relationship between the clinical aspects, CTT, and stool retention score using plain abdominal radiography was determined. RESULTS: Average constipation score was 4.59+/-2.16. Average Bristol stool form scale was 3.86+/-1.13. The total and segmental CTTs showed significant differences between the constipation and non-constipation groups. There was statistically significant (p<0.05) correlation between the total CTT and constipation score or between Starreveld score and Leech score. Each segmental CTT showed significant correlation (p<0.05) between segmental stool retention scores. CONCLUSION: The stool retention score showed significant correlation with constipation score as well as total and segmental CTT. Thus, plain abdominal radiography is a simple and convenient method for the evaluation of bowel dysfunction in stroke patients.
Colon ; Constipation ; Humans ; Radiography, Abdominal* ; Stroke*

PURPOSE: To determine the value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using HASTE (half- Fourier single-shot turbo spin-echo) and true FISP (fast imaging with steady-state precession and heavy T2-weighting) sequences in diagnosing bowel obstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-one consecutive patients in whom suspected bowel obstruction was revealed at plain abdominal radiography, barium study, and computed tomography (CT) were admitted during an eight-month period. Eighteen of 27 in whom bowel obstruction was confirmed underwent MRI using HASTE and true FISP sequences. RESULTS: At MRI, bowel obstruction was diagnosed in all patients. Using the HASTE sequence, the site of obstruction was correctly identified in 16 patients(89%) and the cause of obstruction was correctly diagnosed in 15(83%). Using the true FISP sequence, the corresponding figures were 16(89%) and 16(89%). Of the 18 patients with confirmed bowel obstruction, 33%(6/18) showed better lesion conspicuity at true FISP, for 39%(7/18), conspicuity was equal at both sequences, 28%(5/18) showed better conspicuity at HASTE. CONCLUSION: MRI can be useful for evaluation the presence, site and cause of bowel obstruction. On comparing the findings of HASTE and true FISP sequences, no significant differences were observed.
Barium ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging* ; Radiography, Abdominal

OBJECTIVETo investigate the image quality, radiation dose and diagnostic value of the low-tube-voltage high-pitch dual-source computed tomography (DSCT) with sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE) for non-enhanced abdominal and pelvic scans.

METHODSThis institutional review board-approved prospective study included 64 patients who gave written informed consent for additional abdominal and pelvic scan with DSCT in the period from November to December 2012. The patients underwent standard non-enhanced CT scans (protocol 1) [tube voltage of 120 kVp/pitch of 0.9/filtered back-projection (FBP) reconstruction] followed by high-pitch non-enhanced CT scans (protocol 2) (100 kVp/3.0/SAFIRE). The total scan time, mean CT number, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), image quality, lesion detectability and radiation dose were compared between the two protocols.

RESULTSThe total scan time of protocol 2 was significantly shorter than that of protocol 1 (1.4±0.1 seconds vs. 7.6±0.6 seconds, P<0.001). There was no significant difference between protocol 1 and protocol 2 in mean CT number of all organs (liver, 55.4±6.3 HU vs. 56.1±6.8 HU, P=0.214; pancreas, 43.6±5.9 HU vs. 43.7±5.8 HU, P=0.785; spleen, 47.9±3.9 HU vs. 49.4±4.3 HU, P=0.128; kidney, 32.2±2.3 HU vs. 33.1±2.3 HU, P=0.367; abdominal aorta, 44.8±5.6 HU vs. 45.0±5.5 HU, P=0.499; psoas muscle, 50.7±4.1 HU vs. 50.3±4.5 HU, P=0.279). SNR on images of protocol 2 was higher than that of protocol 1 (liver, 5.0±1.2 vs. 4.5±1.1, P<0.001; pancreas, 4.0±1.0 vs. 3.6±0.8, P<0.001; spleen, 4.7±1.0 vs. 4.1±0.9, P<0.001; kidney, 3.1±0.6 vs. 2.8±0.6, P<0.001; abdominal aorta, 4.1±1.0 vs. 3.8±1.0, P<0.001; psoas muscle, 4.5±1.1 vs. 4.3±1.2, P=0.012). The overall image noise of protocol 2 was lower than that of protocol 1 (9.8±3.1 HU vs. 11.1±3.0 HU, P<0.001). Image quality of protocol 2 was good but lower than that of protocol 1 (4.1±0.7 vs. 4.6±0.5, P<0.001). Protocol 2 perceived 229 of 234 lesions (97.9%) that were detected in protocol 1 in the abdomen and pelvis. Radiation dose of protocol 2 was lower than that of protocol 1 (4.4±0.4 mSv vs. 7.3±2.4 mSv, P<0.001) and the mean dose reduction was 41.4%.

CONCLUSIONThe high-pitch DSCT with SAFIRE can shorten scan time and reduce radiation dose while preserving image quality in non-enhanced abdominal and pelvic scans.

The lateral margin of the psoas muscle, contrasted by retroperitoneal fat, is usually visualized o plainabdominal radiography. Failure to visualize all or segment of lateral margin of the psoas muscle, so called psoassing, has been emphasized as reliable finding of retroperitoneal pathology. But the significance of psoas sign hasbeen controversial. The authors reevaluated ‘psoas sign’ by comparing 160 abdominal radiography with CT. Theresults were as follows: 1. In 160 supine radiographys, good visualization was present in 106 cases(66.3%), faintvisualizatin in 24(15.0%), segmental nonvisualization in 18(11.3%), and completer nonvisualization in 12(7.5%). In113 erect radiographs, good visualization was present in only 36 cases(31.9%). 2. Asymmetric visualization waspresent in 84 out of 160 cases. In patient with scoliosis, lateral margin of convex side was seen more clearlythan concave side, and this finding was statistically significant (p<0.005). 3. Ascites did not directly influenceto psoa visualization contrary to common belief. 4. In 54 cases of faint or nonvisualization, normal was16(29.6%), intraperitoneal pathology was 16(29.6%), and retroperitoneal pathology was 22(40.7%). 1) In normalpatient, psoas contact with kidney or intestine and deformed psoas muscle were responsible for poor visualization. 2) The major cause of poor visualization in intraperitoneal pathology were psoas contact with displaced kidney byhepatomegaly, ascites with scanty retroperitoneal fat and derformed psaos muscle. 3) The major cause of poorvisualization in retroperitoneal pathology were psoas invasion by tumor or inflammation, psoas conntact withenlarged kidney or perirenal lesion. 5. In summary, the mechanism of faint or nonvisualization of psoas marginwere: 1) psoas contact with normal or pathologic organs 2) psoas invasion by tumor or inflammation 3) deformedpsoas muscle 4) scanty retroperitoneal fat
Ascites ; Humans ; Inflammation ; Intestines ; Intra-Abdominal Fat ; Kidney ; Pathology ; Psoas Muscles ; Radiography ; Radiography, Abdominal ; Scoliosis

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Due to widespread use of computerized tomography (CT) scan to examine patients with variable disease or complaints, detection of incidental or unsuspected gastrointestinal abnormalities are not uncommon. Clinical significance of incidentally detected bowel wall thickening (BWT) on abdominal CT scan is uncertain at present. Despite the necessity for the clinical guidelines describing the evaluation of incidental bowel wall thickening on CT scan, there have been few studies concerning these radiological abnormalities. Our objective was to determine whether endoscopic evaluation is necessary for the evaluation of these abnormal findings. METHODS: This study evaluated one hundred and forty patients with incidentally detected BWT on abdominal CT scan in Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital from 2001 to 2003. 102 patients of those were proceeded by endoscopic evaluation. Forty-eight patients had received upper endoscopy, 26 patients had colonoscopy, while 28 patients had sigmoidoscopy. RESULTS: Endoscopic work up revealed significant abnormalities in 83% of patients with incidental findings of the distal esophagus, 73% of patients with thickening of the stomach, 35% of patients with thickening of the right colon, and 71% of patients with thickening of the sigmoid colon and rectum. CONCLUSIONS: Although significant pathologic findings are less common in thickening of the right colon than other bowel wall thickening, all of these incidental findings on CT scan warrant further endoscopic evaluation.
Esophagus/radiography ; Female ; Humans ; Incidental Findings ; Intestines/pathology/*radiography ; Male ; Middle Aged ; *Radiography, Abdominal ; Stomach/radiography ; *Tomography, X-Ray Computed

PURPOSE: Precise localization of tumors and creation of sufficient proximal resection margins are complicated processes during total laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) for clinical T1/T2 gastric cancers. Various solutions to this problem have also yielded many disadvantages. In this study, we reviewed a preoperative endoscopic clipping method based on the results of negative biopsy and selective intraoperative radiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 345 consecutive patients who underwent TLDG and preoperative endoscopic clipping for tumor localization was conducted. During preoperative endoscopy, the endoscopists performed negative biopsies just 1–2 cm selectively above the tumor's upper limit. After confirming the biopsy results, endoscopic metal clips were applied just proximal to the negative biopsy site the day before surgery. Selective intraoperative tumor localization using portable abdominal radiography was performed only when we could not ensure a precise resection line. RESULTS: Negative biopsy was performed in 244 patients. Larger tumor size (P=0.008) and more distally located tumors (P=0.052) were observed more frequently in the negative biopsy group than in the non-negative biopsy group. The non-negative biopsy group had significantly higher frequencies of differentiated tumor types than the negative biopsy group (P=0.003). Of the 244 patients who underwent negative biopsies, 6 had cancer cells in their biopsy specimens. We performed intraoperative radiography in 12 patients whose tumors had difficult-to-determine proximal margins. No tumors were found in the proximal resection margins of any patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our tumor localization method is a promising and accurate method for securing a sufficient resection margin during TLDG.
Biopsy* ; Endoscopy ; Gastrectomy* ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Methods* ; Radiography* ; Radiography, Abdominal ; Retrospective Studies ; Stomach Neoplasms