1.Radiation safety assessment of X-ray baggage scanners in a Metro Manila hotel and a port facility
Kristina Marie S. Maxino ; Migel Antonio Catalig ; Chryzel Angelica B. Gonzales
Philippine Journal of Health Research and Development 2022;26(CAS Issue):94-100
Background:
The ionizing radiation produced by X-ray baggage scanners may cause harmful health effects to the health of occupational workers and members of the public. Hence, the International Commission on Radiological Protection recommends that radiation exposures from X-ray baggage scanners be kept as low as reasonably achievable.
Objectives:
This study was done to assess the occupational risk from the measured ambient radiation from anti-crime X-ray scanners from a hotel and a port facility in Metro Manila. This was done by comparing the measured radiation levels with the acceptable limits required by the Center for Device Regulation, Radiation Health, and Research (CDRRHR) –Department of Health (DOH) – Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Methodology:
Ambient radiation of X-ray baggage scanners from Manila North Harbour Port Inc. (MNHPI) and Marriott Hotel Manila (MHM) were measured using RaySafe Xi survey detector while both machines were in operation. Measurements were done at a five-cm distance from the surface of the scanner console, front, back, left, and right sides. Peak measurements of ambient radiation were then obtained to overestimate the scattered radiation dose received by the worker assigned to the scanner. Values from the peak measurement were then compared with the limits set by the CDRRHR-DOH-FDA.
Results:
The maximum measured ambient radiations at 5 cm from the surface of the machine were 0.590 μSv/hr and 3.519 μSv/hr from MNHPI and MHM, respectively. Both peak measurements were less than the 5.000 μSv/hr limit set by the CDRRHR-DOH-FDA.
Conclusion
Measurements from both facilities are within the required limit of the 5 μSv/hr at 5 cm distance from the external surface of the X-ray baggage scanner, set by the CDRRHR-DOH-FDA. It was also seen that the calculated annual occupation dose of the operator is within the limits set by ICRP. It is also recommended to study measuring at other distances from the surface of the scanner to determine whether safety protocols should be reassessed.
Radiation Protection
2.Establishment of Evaluation System for Medical Optical Radiation Protective Eyewears.
Yongjie LUO ; Jingtao WANG ; Jianhua PENG ; Pengbin HUA
Chinese Journal of Medical Instrumentation 2022;46(5):570-573
As a kind of class II medical device, medical optical radiation protective eyewears should meet the requirements of safety and effectiveness. In this study, the evaluation system of medical optical radiation protective eyewears is established. Combined with the medical device registration unit division guidelines, the classification method of medical optical radiation protective eyewears is given. Medical optical radiation protective eyewears are not only assembled spectacles, but also have special optical radiation protection performance. The performance evaluation method of medical optical radiation protective eyewears and the evaluation method of shelf life for medical optical radiation protective eyewears are given.
Radiation Protection
3.Radiation Exposure of the Hand and Chest during C-arm Fluoroscopy-Guided Procedures.
Cheol Hee JUNG ; Jae Sung RYU ; Seung Woo BAEK ; Ji Hye OH ; Nam Sik WOO ; Hae Kyoung KIM ; Jae Hun KIM
The Korean Journal of Pain 2013;26(1):51-56
BACKGROUND: The C-arm fluoroscope is an essential tool for the intervention of pain. The aim of this study was to investigate the radiation exposure experienced by the hand and chest of pain physicians during C-arm fluoroscopy-guided procedures. METHODS: This is a prospective study about radiation exposure to physicians during transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) and medial branch block (MBB). Four pain physicians were involved in this study. Data about effective dose (ED) at each physician's right hand and left side of the chest, exposure time, radiation absorbed dose (RAD), and the distance from the center of the X-ray field to the physician during X-ray scanning were collected. RESULTS: Three hundred and fifteen cases were included for this study. Demographic data showed no significant differences among the physicians in the TFESIs and MBBs. In the TFESI group, there was a significant difference between the ED at the hand and chest in all the physicians. In physician A, B and C, the ED at the chest was more than the ED at the hand. The distance from the center of the X-ray field to physician A was more than that of the other physicians, and for the exposure time, the ED and RAD in physician A was less than that of the other physicians. In the MBB group, there was no difference in the ED at the hand and chest, except for physician D. The distance from the center of the X-ray field to physician A was more than that of the other physicians and the exposure time in physician A was less than that of the other physicians. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the distance from the radiation source, position of the hand, experience and technique can correlate with the radiation dose.
Hand
;
Prospective Studies
;
Radiation Protection
;
Thorax
4.Development of Lead Free Shielding Material for Diagnostic Radiation Beams.
Tae Jin CHOI ; Young Kee OH ; Jin Hee KIM ; Ok Bae KIM
Korean Journal of Medical Physics 2010;21(2):232-237
The shielding materials designed for replacement of lead equivalent materials for lighter apron than that of lead in diagnostic photon beams. The absorption characteristics of elements were applied to investigate the lead free material for design the shielding materials through the 50 kVp to 110 kVp x-ray energy in interval of 20 kVp respectively. The idea focused to the effect of K-edge absorption of variable elements excluding the lead material for weight reduction. The designed shielding materials composited of Tin 34.1%, Antimon 33.8% and Iodine 26.8% and Polyisoprene 5.3% gram weight account for 84 percent of weight of lead equivalent of 0.5 mm thickness. The size of lead-free shielder was 200x200x1.5 mm3 and 3.2 g/cm3 of density which is equivalent to 0.42 mm of Pb. The lead equivalent of 0.5 mm thickness generally used for shielding apron of diagnostic X rays which is transmitted 0.1% for 50 kVp, 0.9% for 70 kVp and 3.2% for 90 kVp and 4.8% for 110 kVp in experimental measurements. The experiment of transmittance for lead-free shielder has showed 0.3% for 50 kVp, 0.6% for 70 kVp, 2.0% for 90 kVp and 4.2% for 110 kVp within 0.1%. respectively. Using the attenuation coefficient of experiments for 0.5 mm Pb equivalent of lead-free materials showed 0.1%. 0.3%, 1.0% and 2.4%, respectively. Furthermore, the transmittance of lead-free shielder for scatter rays has showed the 2.4% in operation energy of 50 kVp and 5.9% in energy of 110 kVp against 2.4% and 5.1% for standard lead thickness within 0.2% discrepancy, respectively. In this experiment shows the designed lead-free shielder is very effective for reduction the apron weight in diagnostic radiation fields.
Absorption
;
Iodine
;
Radiation Protection
;
Tin
;
Weight Loss
5.From microdosimetry to nanodosimetry--the link between radiobiology and radiation physics.
Journal of Biomedical Engineering 2014;31(3):703-707
The link between micro- and macro-parameters for radiation interactions that take place in living biological systems is described in this paper. Meanwhile recent progress and development in microdosimetry and nanodosimetry are introduced, including the methods to measure and calculate these micro- or nano-parameters. The relationship between radiobiology and physical quantities in microdosimetry and nanodosimetry was presented. Both the current problems on their applications in radiation protection and radiotherapy and the future development direction are proposed.
Humans
;
Physics
;
Radiation Protection
;
Radiobiology
;
Radiometry
6.Radiation protection in dental clinic.
Korean Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology 2007;37(3):117-126
Although the diagnostic information provided by radiographs may be of definite benefit to the patients, the radiographic examination does carry the potential for harm from exposure to ionizing radiation. Therefore we should try to expose radiation as low as reasonably achievable and to give diagnostic information to patients as much as possible. All of dentists should have competence in radiation protection. I wish to deal with what we should do for the optimization of radiation protection in dental clinic.
Dental Clinics*
;
Dentists
;
Humans
;
Mental Competency
;
Radiation Protection*
;
Radiation, Ionizing
7.The reduction methods of operator's radiation dose for portable dental X-ray machines.
Jeong Yeon CHO ; Won Jeong HAN
Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics 2012;37(3):160-164
OBJECTIVES: This study was aimed to investigate the methods to reduce operator's radiation dose when taking intraoral radiographs with portable dental X-ray machines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two kinds of portable dental X-ray machines (DX3000, Dexcowin and Rextar, Posdion) were used. Operator's radiation dose was measured with an 1,800 cc ionization chamber (RadCal Corp.) at the hand level of X-ray tubehead and at the operator's chest and waist levels with and without the backscatter shield. The operator's radiation dose at the hand level was measured with and without lead gloves and with long and short cones. RESULTS: The backscatter shield reduced operator's radiation dose at the hand level of X-ray tubehead to 23 - 32%, the lead gloves to 26 - 31%, and long cone to 48 - 52%. And the backscatter shield reduced operator's radiation dose at the operator's chest and waist levels to 0.1 - 37%. CONCLUSIONS: When portable dental X-ray systems are used, it is recommended to select X-ray machine attached with a backscatter shield and a long cone and to wear the lead gloves.
Hand
;
Radiation Dosage
;
Radiation Protection
;
Radiography, Dental, Digital
;
Thorax
8.Some concerns about ionizing radiation for diagnostic studies.
Chinese Journal of Cardiology 2011;39(2):97-100
Imaging has been a wonderful addition to diagnosing cardiac and other non-cardiac problems. However, there has been a huge increase in the number of procedures related to the use of ionizing radiation in the United States over the last several years. In 2010 clinical cardiologists use all available imaging modalities to optimally manage patients with cardiovascular disease. This article will focus only on imaging requiring ionizing radiation. The purpose of this report is to highlight the amount of radiation exposure used to investigate cardiac and non-cardiac disease states and to call attention to the potential short and long term effects of ionizing radiation on your patients.
Diagnostic Imaging
;
adverse effects
;
Humans
;
Radiation Protection
;
Radiation, Ionizing
9.Study on Intelligent Automatic Tracking Radiation Protection Curtain.
Longyang ZHAO ; Jindong HAN ; Minjian OU ; Jinlong CHEN
Chinese Journal of Medical Instrumentation 2015;39(5):344-346
In order to overcome the shortcomings of traditional X-ray inspection taking passive protection mode, this paper combines the automatic control technology, puts forward a kind of active protection X-ray equipment. The device of automatic detection of patients receiving X-ray irradiation part, intelligent adjustment in patients and shooting device between automatic tracking radiation protection device height. The device has the advantages of automatic adjustment, anti-radiation device, reduce the height of non-irradiated area X-ray radiation and improve the work efficiency. Testing by the professional organization, the device can decrease more than 90% of X-ray dose for patients with non-irradiated area.
Humans
;
Radiation Dosage
;
Radiation Protection
;
instrumentation
;
methods
;
X-Rays
10.Design and Test of Automatic Dispensing and Injecting System for Positron Radiopharmaceuticals.
Ning GUO ; Tong WANG ; Li HUO ; Fang LI ; Li-Jie LIU ; Yi LI ; Jian-Tao BA
Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae 2021;43(3):429-434
Objective To design a novel automatic dispensing and injecting system of positron radiopharmaceuticals,for precise dose dispensing,simplified operation,and reduction of occupational radiation exposure. Methods The automatic dispensing and injecting system was fabricated with tungsten alloy as the shielding material.The performance and radiation protection of the device were assessed. Results The total time of injection using the automatic dispensing and injecting system was about 60 s.The ratio of successful injection in stability test was 100%.The deviation of the dispensing dose with the system was ≤3%.With the tungsten alloy shield(40 mmPb of the cabinet,60 mmPb of the countertop,15 mmPb of the protective shield,and 50 mmPb of the inbuilt jar for radiopharmaceuticals),the average dose rate at 30 cm from the device was 1.44 μSv/h,and the radiation dose at the operator's extremity was reduced by 99%. Conclusions This automatic dispensing and injecting system of positron radiopharmaceuticals is easy to operate with precise dispensing dose.It is safe and meets the requirements of radiation protection.
Electrons
;
Occupational Exposure/analysis*
;
Radiation Dosage
;
Radiation Protection
;
Radiopharmaceuticals