1.Acute renal failure following the use of rosiglitazone in a chronic kidney disease patient.
R Abdul GHANI ; S ZAINUDIN ; N A KAMARUDDIN ; N C T KONG
Singapore medical journal 2009;50(1):e32-4
Drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis is a well-recognised and important reversible cause of acute renal failure. Peroxisome-proliferator activated receptor-gamma agonists, such as rosiglitazone, have been proven to be safe in chronic kidney disease patients. We describe a 65-year-old man with long-standing diabetes mellitus and hypertension, presenting with a five-day history of fluid overload and uraemic symptoms. There was no ingestion of analgesics, alternative medicine and other nephrotoxic drugs, the only new prescription being rosiglitazone, which was commenced during his last clinic follow-up two weeks prior to presentation. He required haemodialysis with minimal improvement in renal profile, despite cessation of the offending drug. Renal biopsy revealed findings consistent with acute interstitial nephritis. An episode of upper gastrointestinal bleeding with bleeding duodenal ulcer limited the use of steroids. He was treated with a course of mycophenolate mofetil which showed good gradual response and he remained stable with residual renal impairment.
Acute Kidney Injury
;
chemically induced
;
drug therapy
;
Aged
;
Humans
;
Hypoglycemic Agents
;
adverse effects
;
Immunosuppressive Agents
;
therapeutic use
;
Kidney Failure, Chronic
;
complications
;
Male
;
Mycophenolic Acid
;
analogs & derivatives
;
therapeutic use
;
Renal Dialysis
;
Thiazolidinediones
;
adverse effects
2.Surgical Management of Distal Tibia Fracture: Towards An Outcome-based Treatment Algorithm
Rushdi I ; Che-Ahmad A ; Abdul-Ghani KAH ; Mohd-Rus R
Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal 2020;14(No.3):57-65
Introduction: Distal tibia fractures are frequently associated
with an extensive soft tissue injury which then leads to a
higher risk of complications such as infection, non-union and
eventually poor overall outcome. The purpose of this study is
to measure the outcome of distal tibia fractures treated with
internal fixation, external fixator or Ilizarov external
fixator(IEF). We aim to propose an algorithm for
management of distal tibia fractures by evaluating the
treatment options, outcomes and risk factors present.
Material and Methods: This study is a cross-sectional study
of all distal tibia fractures treated surgically in Tengku
Ampuan Rahimah Hospital, Klang from 1st January 2016 till
30th June 2018. Patient records were reviewed to analyse the
outcomes of surgical treatment and risk factors associated
with it.
Results: Ninety-one patients were included with a mean age
of 41.5 years (SD = 16.4). Thirty-nine cases (42.9%) were
open fractures. Thirty-eight patients (41.8%) were treated
with internal fixation, 27 patients (29.7%) were treated with
IEF and 26 patients (28.6%) were treated with an external
fixator. Among open fractures cases, no significant finding
can be concluded when comparing each surgical option and
its outcome, although one option was seen better than the
other in a particular outcome. Initial skeletal traction or
temporary spanning external fixator in close fractures
reduced the risk of mal-alignment (p value=0.001). Internal
fixation is seen superior to IEF and external fixator in close
fractures in term of articular surface reduction (p value =
0.043) and risk of mal-alignment (p value = 0.007).
Conclusion: There is no single method of fixation that is
ideal for all pilon fractures and suitable for all patients. This
proposed algorithm can help surgeons in deciding treatment
strategies in the challenging management of distal tibia
fractures to reduce associated complications.
3.Safety attitudes, burnout and well-being among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: an Indo-Pacific regional cross-sectional study.
Abhiram KANNEGANTI ; Benjamin Yong Qiang TAN ; Nik Hisamuddin NIK AB RAHMAN ; Aloysius Sheng-Ting LEOW ; Max DENNING ; Ee Teng GOH ; Lucas Jun HAO LIM ; Ching-Hui SIA ; Ying Xian CHUA ; James KINROSS ; Melanie TAN ; Li Feng TAN ; Yi Min WAN ; Arvind SHARMA ; Rivan DANUAJI ; R N KOMAL KUMAR ; Chew Keng SHENG ; Cheah Phee KHENG ; Sarah Shaikh ABDUL KARIM ; Mohd Najib ABDUL GHANI ; Suhaimi MAHMUD ; Yiong Huak CHAN ; Vijay Kumar SHARMA ; Kang SIM ; Shirley Beng SUAT OOI
Singapore medical journal 2023;64(11):667-676
INTRODUCTION:
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had an unprecedented impact in Asia and has placed significant burden on already stretched healthcare systems. We examined the impact of COVID-19 on the safety attitudes among healthcare workers (HCWs), as well as their associated demographic and occupational factors, and measures of burnout, depression and anxiety.
METHODS:
A cross-sectional survey study utilising snowball sampling was performed involving doctors, nurses and allied health professions from 23 hospitals in Singapore, Malaysia, India and Indonesia between 29 May 2020 and 13 July 2020. This survey collated demographic data and workplace conditions and included three validated questionnaires: the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ), Oldenburg Burnout Inventory and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. We performed multivariate mixed-model regression to assess independent associations with the SAQ total percentage agree rate (PAR).
RESULTS:
We obtained 3,163 responses. The SAQ total PARs were found to be 35.7%, 15.0%, 51.0% and 3.3% among the respondents from Singapore, Malaysia, India and Indonesia, respectively. Burnout scores were highest among respondents from Indonesia and lowest among respondents from India (70.9%-85.4% vs. 56.3%-63.6%, respectively). Multivariate analyses revealed that meeting burnout and depression thresholds and shifts lasting ≥12 h were significantly associated with lower SAQ total PAR.
CONCLUSION
Addressing the factors contributing to high burnout and depression and placing strict limits on work hours per shift may contribute significantly towards improving safety culture among HCWs and should remain priorities during the pandemic.
Humans
;
Cross-Sectional Studies
;
Pandemics
;
COVID-19/epidemiology*
;
Burnout, Psychological
;
Health Personnel