Objective:To observe and explore the feasibility and effectiveness of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) membrane packing and air filling in the treatment of refractory macular holes.Methods:A retrospective clinical study. From January 2019 to January 2020, 17 patients with refractory macular hole (17 eyes) who diagnosed in Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University were included in the study. Among them, there were 7 males (7 eyes) and 10 females (10 eyes), with the age of 55.18±7.91 years. All eyes underwent 23G minimally invasive vitrectomy combined with internal limiting membrane stripping and PRF packing, and air filling was performed at the end of the operation. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and optical coherence tomography angiography were performed in all eyes before surgery and at 1 week and 1, 3 months after surgery. The BCVA examination was performed using a international standard logarithmic visual acuity chart, which was converted into logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity during statistics. Taking 3 months after surgery was as the time point to judge the efficacy, the changes of BCVA, superficial retinal vascular density (SVD), foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area and central foveal thickness (CFT) before and after surgery were compared. Paired t-test was used to compare the indicators before and after surgery. Results:Among the 17 eyes, there were 6, 7, and 4 eyes with giant macular hole, high myopia macular hole, and recurrent macular hole, respectively; the hole diameter was 723.94±38.30 μm. Three months after surgery, all holes were closed. Compared with before surgery, the BCVA ( t=4.458) and SVD ( t=2.675) increased, and the CFT ( t=6.329) and FAZ area ( t=4.258) decreased at 3 months after surgery, and the differences were statistically significant ( P<0.05). At the last follow-up, there was no complications such as intraocular hypertension and retinal detachment in all eyes. Conclusion:Minimally invasive vitrectomy combined with internal limiting membrane stripping and PRF tamponade in the treatment of refractory macular holes can increase the closure rate, improve visual acuity and retinal blood perfusion.

Adhesive intestinal obstruction is the most common type of ileus, and conserva-tive treatment serves as its preferred treatment option. In the course of conservative treatment, gastrointestinal decompression will relieve symptoms, prevent ileus progression and promote gas-trointestinal function recovery, which has significant clinical effects. Currently, decompression effects of nasointestinal tubes and nasogastric tubes are controversial. There is a previous Meta-analysis evaluating decompression effects of these two methods, but this analysis includes non-randomized controlled trial and lacks research about Chinese patients. Therefore, the authors con-duct a Meta-analysis to evaluate decompression effects of nasointestinal tubes versus nasogastric tubes for adhesive intestinal obstruction.