Objective To standardize an expert consensus on pulmonary rehabilitation nursing of chronic respiratory diseases. Methods On the basis of literature review, 5 experts were interviewed and 19 experts were consulted to establish the primary and secondary themes. 10 nursing experts in this field were invited to conduct peer review on the draft consensus to modify and improve the consensus content. Results After expert consultations，14 first-level themes and 40 second-level themes were established. The value of Ca (judgment coefficient),Cs (familiarity coefficient) and Cr (authority coefficient) were 0.895,0.839 and 0.867 ,which indicated the expert consultation have high authority and credibility. The Kendall coefficients of first-round expert consultation were 0.121 and 0.151, and they were 0.205 and 0.149 in the second round (P<0.05).In the first-round expert consultation, the coefficients of variation of the first and second themes were 0.197 and 0.200,and in the second round ,they were 0.202 and 0.237. They were all less than 0.25 , indicating that the expert's judgment results were relatively consistent. Conclusion As this consensus was developed based on 19 clinical nursing professionals from across the country, it is scientific and authoritative. This consensus can not only benefit to clinical nursing practice, but also lay the foundation for the development of guideline, and it still needs further theoretical and empirical research verification.

Objective? To explore the effects of family participation in the respiratory rehabilitation of the patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in terms of their treatment compliance and outcomes. Methods? Totally 80 COPD patients admitted in The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from March 2016 to August 2017 were selected and divided into the control group (n=40) and the observation group (n=40) according to the random number table. Patients in the control group received conventional respiratory rehabilitation intervention, while the patients had their family members participated in the rehabilitation process in the observation group. Treatment compliance and effects were compared between the two groups. Results? The compliance of the observation group totaled 97.50%, while that of the control group totaled 87.50% (χ2=7.207, P＜ 0.05). After 3 months' intervention, the walking distance within 6 min of the observation group was (278.72±45.89) m; the PEF pred% was (93.46±13.47)%; and FEV1% was (87.42±14.71)%, better than those of the control group (t=4.127,7.156,3.859;P＜ 0.05). Conclusions? Family participation in respiratory rehabilitation process can improve the compliance of COPD patients significantly, thus improve the treatment effects, which is worth promoting in clinical practice.