Objective To evaluate the relationship between intraocular pressure (IOP) and anterior chamber angle in patients with different types of acute angle-closure glaucoma after phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation. Design Retrospective case series. Participants 173 cases of acute angle-closure glaucoma coexisting cataract (173 eyes) in Mingren Eye Hospital from January, 2005 to June, 2007. Methods All patients with acute angle-closure glaucoma underwent phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation, and were examined with high-frequency ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM). Anterior chamber depth (ACD), intraocular pressure (IOP) and anterior chamber angle (ACA) were measured. Follow-up was 1-48 weeks after surgery. Main Outcome Measures Intraocular pressure, phacoemulsification complications, re-open rate of anterior chamber angle. Results At 8th week after surgery, the rate of IOP control in pupillary block group, non-pupillary blocking group, and multimechanism group was 88.9%, 52.0%, 83.4%, respectively and there was a statistically significant between these groups (?2=7.13, P=0.022). At 48th week, the rate of IOP control was 54.2%, 33.3%, 35.8%, respectively(?2=12.56, P=0.003). Fifty patients were follow up with UBM, and 66.7% in pupillary block group, 33.3% in non-pupillary blocking group and 33.3% in multimechanism group in 48 weeks postoperatively showed evidence of the widened anterior chamber angle. No specific postoperative complications were found in this study compared with those with phacoemulsification without glaucoma. Conclusions The use of phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation for acute angle-closure glaucoma coexsiting cataract can get best IOP-controlled rates in pupillary block group. It is related to the degree of widened anterior chamber angle.

BACKGROUND:Hidden blood loss is an important risk for the intertrochanteric fracture patients, especial y the elderly patients, which can cause anemia in patients after internal fixation and can affect wound healing and patient recovery. OBJECTIVE:To compare the perioperative hidden blood loss and the risk factors of proximal femoral anti-rotation intramedul ary nail internal fixation and dynamic hip screw fixation for the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fracture. METHODS:We selected 70 cases of femoral intertrochanteric fracture patients who treated with proximal femoral anti-rotation intramedul ary nail and dynamic hip screw fixation, including 21 patients with the age ≥ 80 years and 49 patients with the age<80 years;28 patients with the body mass index>30 kg/m2 and 42 patients with the body mass index ≤ 30 kg/m2;30 patients received anti-rotation intramedul ary nail internal fixation and 40 patients received dynamic hip screw fixation. The perioperative blood loss was calculated with Gross formula according to the changes of height, body mass index and the hematocrit before and after fixation. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:The mean total blood loss was 936 mL, the mean dominant blood loss was 237 mL and the mean hidden blood loss was 699 mL. The hidden blood loss was accounted for 74.7%in total blood loss. The dominant blood loss in the dynamic hip screw fixation group was higher than that in the anti-rotation intramedul ary nail internal fixation group, and the hidden blood loss was lower than the anti-rotation intramedul ary nail internal fixation group. The total blood loss and the hidden blood loss of the elderly patients were higher than those of the non-elderly patients;there was no significant difference between male and female patients, obesity and normal patients. The results indicate that hidden blood loss is the major reason for total blood loss of femoral intertrochanteric fracture after internal fixation. The hidden blood loss of anti-rotation intramedul ary nail internal fixation is larger than that of dynamic hip screw fixation, and elder is the risk factor for hidden blood loss.

Objective:To analyze the factors influencing the success rate of external cephalic version (ECV) and to create a preoperative scoring scale for stratified management of pregnant women who were preparing for ECV.Methods:This prospective study was conducted on singleton pregnant women who underwent ECV without anesthesia in Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2019. Univariate (two independent samples t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Chi-square test) and multivariate logistic regression were used to screen the clinical characteristics affecting the success of ECV, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the cut-off value and convert quantitative variables into dichotomous variables. The independent variables were scored according to the regression coefficient in multivariate logistic regression analysis, and then a preoperative scoring scale was created. The ROC curve was used to calculate the cut-off value for the scoring scale. The subjects were divided into low and high score groups according to the cut-off value. The area under the ROC curve was used for evaluating the effectiveness of the scale in predicting the success of ECV. The success rate of ECV, difficulty of the operation and mode of delivery were compared between the two groups. Results:A total of 1 338 pregnant women met the inclusion criteria during the study period. After the exclusion of 885 women, 165 refused ECV in favor of direct cesarean section, 27 spontaneously converted to cephalic position before ECV, 261 who voluntarily accepted ECV were finally enrolled. ECV succeeded in 202 cases and failed in 59. (1) Favorable factors for ECV without anesthesia were the distance between the fetal breech and ischial spine <－3.5 cm ( OR=0.177, 95% CI: 0.071-0.438, P=0.009), the sum of the fundal height and the station of the fetal breech based on the ischial spine <30.25 cm ( OR=0.225, 95% CI: 0.094-0.537, P=0.001), amniotic fluid index ≥12 cm ( OR=0.399, 95% CI: 0.164-0.969, P=0.042), the surgeon's ability to hold the fetal head or breech with one hand ( OR=0.241, 95% CI: 0.098-0.589, P=0.002; OR=0.219, 95% CI: 0.087-0.546, P=0.001), and the fetal head located on the right or left upper abdomen of the mother ( OR=0.184, 95% CI: 0.059-0.568, P=0.003; OR=0.253, 95% CI: 0.084-0.760, P=0.014). (2) The area under the ROC curve of the preoperative score for predicting the success of ECV was 0.881 (95% CI: 0.821-0.941) and the cut-off value was 5.5. The subjects were divided into low (0-5 scores) and high (6-11 scores) score groups and the area under the ROC curve for predicting the success of ECV by grouping was 0.843 (95% CI: 0.774-0.912). Compared with the low score group, the high score group had a shorter ECV duration [2.0 min (0.5-10.0 min) vs 10.0 min (0.9-25.8 min), Z=－6.83, P<0.001], less attempts [1.0 times (1.0-4.0 times) vs 3.0 times (1.0-5.0 times), Z=－8.41, P<0.001], higher success rate [92.7% (190/205) vs 21.4% (12/56), χ2=127.64, P<0.001], higher rate of vaginal birth [75.4% (147/195) vs 18.5% (10/54)] and lower cesarean section rate [24.6% (48/195) vs 81.5% (44/54)] ( χ2=58.70, P<0.001). Conclusions:Preoperative scoring based on the factors influencing the success rate of ECV (the distance between the fetal breech and ischial spine, the sum of the fundal height and the station of the fetal breech based on the ischial spine <30.25 cm, amniotic fluid index ≥12 cm, the surgeon's ability to hold the fetal head or breech with one hand, and the fetal head locating on the right or left upper abdomen of the mother) is conducive to the individualized evaluation of the difficulty and the success rate of ECV as well as the success rate of vaginal delivery after ECV, which can provide a reference for clinical stratified management of ECV patients.