Antenatal corticosteroids treatment may improve the neonatal prognosis in babies born prematurely. Despite the various quality of the evidence, antenatal corticosteroids treatment may also be effective in preterm premature rupture of membranes and twin pregnancy. Antenatal corticosteroids treatment should be one of the quality standards for maternal health care in order to increase its application in obstetrics and implement effective obstetric management based on the most recent evidence.

Spatial epidemiology pertains to the description and analysis of characteristics and the development and change rules of diseases, health, and hygiene events in the population based on geographic information system (GIS) and spatial analysis technology. As a general discipline, spatial epidemiology has been widely used in studying various diseases. In the field of perinatal medicine, research has mainly focused on the relationship between obstetric factors and social factors, as well as environmental factors such as air pollution and traffic, and obstetric outcomes. We review the development direction of spatial epidemiology research in perinatal medicine, hoping this interdisciplinary and efficient data system research method could play a more significant role in clinical medicine.

Objective:To compare the safety and efficacy of terbutaline and nifedipine for acute intrapartum fetal resuscitation (IUFR).Methods:This was a prospective randomized controlled study involving 110 pregnant women with non-reassuring fetal heart rate tracings (NRFHT) during delivery at Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center between January and April 2021. These women were randomly allocated to receive subcutaneous terbutaline sulphate (0.25 mg, terbutaline group) or oral nifedipine (10 mg, nifedipine group), with 55 subjects in each group. Hemodynamic parameters including blood pressure, heart rate, and oxygen saturation before and 5, 15 and 30 min after treatment as well as the success rate of intrapartum resuscitation, the onset time of medication, and the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage were analyzed using t test, Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. Results:Two groups both showed no significant difference in the mean arterial pressure or oxygen saturation before or after treatment (all P>0.05). The heart rate was not affected in nifedipine group at any time points ( P>0.05). While the patients treated with terbutaline showed accelerated maternal heart rate 5, 15 and 30 min after administration as compared with the baseline[(97.0±20.2), (99.2±13.8), (91.8±12.6) vs (81.7±11.3) bpm, all P<0.001], but it began to decrease at 30 min, with a drop of 6.4 bpm compared with that at 15 min (95% CI: 1.5-11.2, P<0.05). None of the pregnant women had adverse reactions requiring medical intervention. The rates of successful acute resuscitation were similar in the two groups [terbutaline: 78.2% (43/55) vs nifedipine: 70.9% (39/55), χ 2= 0.77, P=0.381]. Terbutaline had a shorter onset time than nifedipine in slowing the frequency of contractions and returning fetal heart rate to class Ⅰ category [2(1-6) vs 6(1-10) min, U=2 348.50, P<0.001]. No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of NRFHT-indicated cesarean section, assisted vaginal delivery, or second dose of tocolysis within 1 h (all P>0.05) nor in blood loss volume, postpartum hemorrhage rate, low Apgar score, low umbilical artery pH value (pH<7.2), neonatal asphyxia rate, or neonatal intensive care admission rate (all P>0.05). Conclusion:Terbutaline spends less time than nifedipine to take effect and may be an alternative for acute IUFR without significant adverse outcomes.

Objective:To systematically observe the location and severity of perineal lacerations during childbirth and explore the relationship between the length/depth and the degrees of perineal lacerations.Methods:This prospective study recruited full-term singleton cephalic pregnant women planning vaginal delivery at the Fourth Hospital of Shijiazhuang from March 2023 to July 2023. Before the second stage of labor, the perineal body length (PBL) was measured. After delivery, the locations of all birth canal lacerations, the perineal skin lacerations length (PSLL), and the perineal lacerations depth (PLD) were measured and recorded. A magnifying glass was used to identify the layers of the skin and photographs were taken if necessary. Statistical methods such as t-test, rank-sum test, and Chi-square test (or Fisher's exact test) were used to compare the basic conditions and birth canal lacerations between primiparous and multiparous women. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to analyze the sensitivity and specificity of PSLL, PLD, and the PSLL/PBL ratio. Results:During the study period, 200 women were included, of which 189 had vaginal deliveries (173 primiparous and 16 multiparous) and 11 had emergency cesarean sections (10 primiparous and one multiparous). Among the 173 primiparous women with vaginal deliveries, 33 (19.1%) underwent episiotomy, and the other 140 (80.9%) had perineal lacerations. Among these cases of perineal lacerations, nine were complicated by vaginal wall lacerations, 20 by labial lacerations, and four by clitoral and urethral lacerations. There were 32 (22.9%) primiparous women with first-degree perineal lacerations and 108 (77.1%) with second-degree perineal lacerations. Among the 16 multiparous women who delivered vaginally, two had intact birth canals without lacerations, and 14 had perineal lacerations (eight with first-degree and six with second-degree perineal lacerations). Besides, none of them underwent episiotomy or assisted vaginal delivery. The rates of episiotomy and second-degree perineal lacerations were higher in primiparous women than in multiparous women [19.1% (33/173) vs. 0/16, 77.1% (108/173) vs. 6/14, Fisher's exact test, both P<0.05). The PSLL, PLD, and PSLL/PBL ratio were significantly lower in the primiparous women with first-degree perineal lacerations than in the primiparous women with second-degree perineal lacerations [0.0 mm (0.0-10.0 mm) vs. 30.0 mm (25.5-40.0 mm), 5.0 mm (1.5-10.0 mm) vs. 14.0 mm (10.0-15.0 mm), 0.0 mm (0.0-21.1 mm) vs. 63.6 mm (50.0-77.3 mm); Z values were－8.04,－6.46, and－7.75, respectively, all P<0.05]. The optimal cut-off values of PSLL, PLD, and PSLL/PBL ratio for differentiating between first-degree and second-degree perineal lacerations were 15 mm, 9 mm, and 33.33%, with the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.965, 0.869, and 0.951 and the sensitivity of 91.67%, 91.67%, and 89.81%, respectively. The AUC of PSLL was significantly greater than that of PLD ( Z=2.55, P=0.011), but the AUC of PSLL/PBL ratio showed no significant difference with that of PSLL or PLD ( Z=1.18 and 1.89, both P>0.05). Conclusions:It is difficult for full-term primiparas to maintain perineal integrity during vaginal delivery. Measuring the PSLL, PLD, and PSLL/PBL ratio of primiparous women will be useful for distinction between first- and second-degree perineal lacerations.