Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and adverse events of intensity-modulated radiotherapy ( IMRT ) in the treatment of intermediate risk localized prostate cancer, and analyze the significance of prostate-specific antigen ( PSA) level changes. Methods Clinical data of 66 patients with intermediate risk localized prostate cancer admitted to our hospital between 2007 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Sixty patients were treated with endocrine therapy before radiotherapy. The radiation field covered the pelvic lymph node drainage area in 6 cases. Forty-seven patients received image-guided radiotherapy ( IGRT) . The median dose in the prostate and seminal vesicle was 78 Gy and 48 Gy in the pelvic lymph node drainage area. The survival rate was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results The median age was 77 years. The median follow-up time was 71. 3 months. The 5-year sample size was 47. The 3-and 5-year overall survival (OS) was 98％ and 90％.The 3-and 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) was 100％ and 93％.The 3-and 5-year biochemical relapse-free survival was 97％ and 86％. The mean time of PSA declining to the nadir was 5. 83 months. The median level of PSA nadir was 0. 06 ng/ml after IMRT. The incidence of grade I andⅡearly adverse events in the urinary system was 38％ and 6％. The incidence of grade I andⅡearly adverse events in the gastrointestinal system was 21％ and 3％. The incidence of grade I andⅡadvanced-stage adverse events in the urinary system was 9％ and 2％. The incidence of grade I advanced-stage adverse events in the gastrointestinal system was 5％. Conclusions IMRT yields high clinical efficacy in the treatment of intermediate risk localized prostate cancer with a low risk of adverse events in the early and advanced stage. The monitoring of PSA after IMRT contributes to the assessment of clinical prognosis.

Objective:To retrieve relevant evidence for early enteral nutrition support in patients after gastric cancer surgery and summarize the best evidence, so as to provide evidence-based evidence for clinical implementation of postoperative enteral nutrition management for gastric cancer.Methods:Evidence-based questions were established according to PIPOST principles, UpToDate, Cochrane Library, Joanna Briggs Institute Library, BMJ Best Practice, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality website, Medlive, European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism website, American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition website, Embase, Medline, PubMed, SinoMed, Wanfang Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure were searched according to the "6S" evidence model. The retrieval period of every database was from January 1, 2016 to May 31, 2021. The Evidence Pre-Grading and Evidence Recommendation Grading System (2014) of Australian Joanna Briggs Institute Evidence-Based Health Care Center was used to extract evidence from the literature that met the quality standards, determine the evidence grading and recommendation level and form the best evidence.Results:A total of 317 literatures were retrieved, and 10 literatures were included, including 1 guideline, 4 expert consensus and 5 systematic reviews. The 10 evidences were summarized from 4 aspects, including indication evaluation, timing management, route and preparation management and risk management.Conclusions:Current evidence shows that early enteral nutrition is safe and feasible in patients after gastric cancer surgery. In the process of implementing enteral nutrition, medical staff should fully evaluate the indications and needs of patients and make clear and prudent choices for nutritional support channels and preparations of patients, so as to form the best evidence and clinical management programs for early enteral nutrition support for patients after gastric cancer surgery and accelerate postoperative recovery of patients.

Objective To compare the therapeutic effects between three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients with stage Ⅱ/Ⅲ esophageal cancer and investigate the prognostic factors.Methods Medical record of 2 132 patients with stage Ⅱ/Ⅲ esophageal cancer who underwent definitive radiotherapy with/without chemotherapy in 10 hospitals from January 2002 to December 2016 from were retrospectively analyzed.Among these patients,37.9％ of them were aged ≥ 70 years,33.9％ with neck and upper esophageal tumors and 66.1％ with middle and lower esophageal and borderline tumors.The median gross tumor volume (GTV) and lymph node gross tumor volume (GTVnd) was 41.6 cm3.Among them,32％ were stage Ⅱ] and 68％ were stage Ⅲ.A total of 723 patients received 3DCRT and 1 409 cases received IMRT.Patients received an equivalent dose in 2 Gy (EQD2) ≥ 60 Gy accounted for 86.1％,and 41.1％ of them received concurrent chemoradiotherapy.Results The median follow-up time was 60.8 months.The 1-,3-and 5-year overall survival (OS) of all patients was 73.9％,41.7％ and 32.6％,and the 1-,3-and 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 62.2％,37.3％ and 32％,respectively.Multivariate analysis demonstrated that age,primary tumor location,clinical stage,tumor target volume,EQD2 and concurrent chemoradiotherapy were the independent prognostic factors for OS.Age,primary tumor location,clinical stage,tumor target volume and EQD2 were the independent prognostic factors for PFS.The OS and PFS did not significantly differ among the low-risk,low-/moderate-risk,moderate-/high-risk and high-risk groups according to age≥70 years,tumor diameter＞5 cm,tumor volume ≥41.6 cm3 and stage Ⅲ (P＜0.001).After the propensity score matching (PSM) method,neither 3DCRT nor IMRT yielded significant advantages in OS or PFS (P=0.971;P=0.658).However,IMRT tended to yield survival benefits in low-risk patients (P=0.125).Conclusions Both 3DCRT and IMRT yield relatively high OS rate in patients with stage Ⅱ/Ⅲ esophageal cancer.The prognosis model established in this investigation can properly predict the survival of patients.Low-risk patients tend to obtain survival benefits from IMRT.

OBJECTIVE To analyze influential factors for dabigatran exposure in elderly patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. METHODS The clinical information of 75 elderly patients diagnosed with non-valvular atrial fibrillation was collected from our hospital in Jan. 2019-Jun. 2020. One or two steady-state blood drug concentration samples were collected from each patient. NONMEM 7.2.0 software was used to establish a population pharmacokinetics model of dabigatran； the effects of different covariates on the apparent clearance of dabigatran were investigated， and the final model was verified by goodness of fit and Bootstrap method； NONMEM 7.2.0 software was used to analyze the drug exposure of ordinary elderly patients and elderly patients after taking dabigatran ester in different disease states. RESULTS Totally 122 blood concentration samples of dabigatran were collected. Advanced age， creatinine clearance and history of chronic heart failure were screened out as three significant covariates that influenced the clearance of dabigatran in elderly patients. The exposure of population with advanced age increased by about 50% compared with the general elderly， the exposure of population with history of chronic heart failure increased by nearly 30% compared with population without， and the exposure of population with moderate and severe renal injury increased by about 30% and 80% compared with mild. CONCLUSIONS Advanced age， renal injury and history of chronic heart failure are influential factors for elevated systemic exposure of dabigatran.