Objective To develop a observation table with influencing factors for catheter-associated urinary tract infections in critical patients and verify its reliability and validity. Methods Literature review, brainstorming method, expert interview and group discussion were performed to identify items of the form. By convenience sampling method, totally 130 severe patients with urinary catheter were investigated by this scale. This form was evaluated by item analysis, exploratory factor analysis and reliability and validity test. Results The observation table with influencing factors for Catheter-associated Urinary Tract Infections in critical patients consisted of five dimensions and 26 items. The cumulative contribution of variance was 73.752%, the Cronbach′s alpha coefficient was 0.869 and the Spearman-Brown split-half coefficient was 0.828. Regarding to the construct validity, the correlation coefficient between the each factor and total observation table was 0.652~0.873, the correlation coefficient between the factors was 0.311~0.823. All the difference of correlation coefficients were statistically significant (P<0.01). Conclusions The observation table with influencing factors for Catheter-associated Urinary Tract Infections in critical patients has been proved to be reliable and valid. It can be used as a valid tool to assess influencing factors for Catheter-associated Urinary Tract Infections in critical patients.

Objective:To explore the application effect of the multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment nursing in improving postoperative anxiety and depression and quality of life in patients with lateral skull base tumor, so as to provide a constructive template for the multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment nursing.Methods:This was a prospective cohort study design. A total of 100 patients who underwent lateral skull base tumor surgery in Shandong Second Provincial General Hospital from January 2021 to April 2022 were selected as the research objects. The patients were divided into observation group and control group by random digits table method with 50 cases in each group. The control group was given routine nursing care after operation of lateral skull base tumor and routine follow-up management. The observation group received the multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment nursing on the basis of the control group. The intervention time was 3 months. The psychological state and quality of life of the two groups before and after intervention were evaluated by Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS), Short Form Health Questionnaire (SF-36).Results:There was no significant difference in SAS, SDS, and SF-36 scores before intervention between the two groups ( P>0.05). The scores of SAS, SDS and SF-36 after the intervention were (44.58 ± 5.61), (41.66 ± 8.48), (75.66 ± 13.65) points in the observation group, and (50.86 ± 4.91), (45.80 ± 9.32), (68.43 ± 14.34) points in the control group, there were statistically significant differences between the two groups( t values were -5.95, -2.32, 2.58, all P<0.05). Conclusions:The multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment nursing can significantly improve anxiety, depression and quality of life of patients with lateral skull base tumor after surgery.

Objective:To develop a questionnaire on perimenopausal cognition and behavior and verify its reliability and validity, in order to provide an effective tool for evaluating perimenopausal women's cognition, doctor-seeking and doctor-following behaviors.Methods:Baseline survey, literature analysis and brainstorming were formed in the initial items, and group discussion and expert interview were performed to identify items of the form. By convenience sampling method, A survey was conducted on perimenopausal women in the communities around Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children from July to August 2019. Project analysis, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, Pearson correlation analysis and reliability test were used to evaluate the questionnaire.Results:Two rounds of questionnaires were distributed in this study. In the first round, 260 questionnaires were distributed, 249 valid questionnaires were recovered, and the effective recovery rate was 95.8% (249/260). In the second round, 249 questionnaires were distributed, and the effective recovery rate was 96.4% (240/249). The questionnaire on perimenopausal cognition and behavior included 4 dimensions and 24 items. The cumulative contribution of variance was 66.330%, the Cronbach α coefficient was 0.893 and the spearman-brown half-fold coefficient was 0.773. Regarding to the construct validity, the correlation coefficient between factors and total score of the questionnaire was 0.567-0.860 ( P < 0.01). Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the approximate error root mean square was 0.055, the normal fitting index was 0.801, and the goodness of fit index was 0.828. Conclusions:The questionnaire has been proved to be reliable and valid. It can be used to evaluate perimenopausal women′s cognition, doctor-seeking and doctor-following behaviors.