Objective To investigate the role of G protein signal regulator 2(RGS2)in regulating the formation of angiotensin Ⅱ(Ang Ⅱ)-induced aortic dissection.Methods C57BL/6 mice were divided into 3 groups:control group(n=10),Ang Ⅱ group(n=20),Ang Ⅱ+sh-RGS2 group(n=20).The Ang Ⅱ group and Ang Ⅱ+sh-RGS2 group established an aortic dissection model.The incidence of aortic dissection was evaluated in vivo,and the phenotypic transformation of VSMC was evaluated in vitro and in vivo.Results Knockdown of RGS2 largely coun-teracted Ang Ⅱ-induced inhibition of αSMA,ACTA2 and MYH11,and suppressed Ang Ⅱ-induced SPP1 and Vim-entin in VSMC.The incidence of aortic dissection in Ang Ⅱ group and Ang Ⅱ+sh-RGS2 group were 45％(9/20)and 10％(2/20),respectively.Fewer elastic lamina thickening,aortic rupture,and aortic wall collagen fiber con-tent were observed in Ang Ⅱ+sh-RGS2 group compared to Ang Ⅱ group.In addition,compared with the Ang Ⅱgroup,the maximum diameter of the aorta in the Ang Ⅱ+sh-RGS2 group was significantly reduced(P＜0.05).In addition,the ACTA2 and MYH11 proteins in the aorta of the Ang Ⅱ+sh-RGS2 group were significantly higher than those in the Ang Ⅱ group(P＜0.01),while the RGS2,SPP1,and Vimentin proteins significantly decreased(P＜0.01).Conclusion Knockdown of RGS2 inhibits the transformation of Ang Ⅱ-induced VSMC from a contractile phenotype to a synthetic phenotype,thereby reducing the incidence of aortic dissection formation.

Objective: To explore the efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF). Methods: A retrospective analysis of 76 patients with OVCF treated with single and double pedicle approach PVP from April 2016 to June 2017 in the First Affiliated Hospital of He′nan University was conducted.According to the operation method, the patients were divided into unilateral group (42 patients, unilateral pedicle approach), and bilateral group (34 cases, bilateral pedicle approach). The operation time, number of intraoperative X-rays, amount of bone cement injection, height of the vertebral body and the complications were compared between the two groups.The visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Oswestry dysfunction index(ODI) score were used to assess the recovery of the patients. Results: The unilateral group had less operative time[(33.01±3.78)min], intraoperative X-ray number[(22.06±3.85) times]and bone cement injection[(3.53±0.42) mL] compared with the bilateral group (t=8.54, 5.98, 4.74, all P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the recovery of vertebral height and complications between the two groups (all P>0.05). The postoperative VAS and ODI of the two groups were significantly improved compared with those before operation (all P<0.05). Conclusion In the case of reasonable indications, the unilateral approach PVP is better than bilateral, and unilateral approach PVP should be the first choice for OVCF.