Objective To compare the effects of different doses of dexmedetomidine on postoperative analgesia and sedation.Methods From January 2014 to November 2015,60 cases who needed postoperative analgesia and sedation in our hospital were selected.According to the dosage of dexmedetomidine,they were divided into control group and observation group,30 cases in each group.Two groups of patients were given analgesia pump for analgesia, with 0.5μg·kg-1·h-1,1.0μg·kg-1·h-1 two doses of dexmedetomidine,and analgesia 48 h.At different time points,the VAS pain score,Ramsay sedation score of the two groups were compared,the calm satisfaction in both two groups was recorded,the average incidence of delirium and delirium score in the process of the treatment and the occurrence of adverse reactions were observed.Results With the extension of time of postoperative analgesia,VAS scores in each group decreased,VAS scores in the observation group after 4h,8h,12h were (3.01 ±0.53)points, (1.95 ±0.58)points,(1.52 ±0.35)points,which were lower than those of the control group[(3.92 ±0.32)points, (2.86 ±0.67)points,(2.25 ±0.78)points],the differences were statistically significant (t=3.42,4.11,2.43,all P<0.05).After 24h,48 h,VAS score between the two groups had no significant difference(P>0.05).Postoperative 4h Ramsay score between the two groups had no significant difference (P >0.05 ).With increased postoperative analgesia time,Ramsay scores in two groups decreased,postoperative 8h,12h,Ramsay scores in the observation group [(2.95 ±0.83)points,(2.22 ±0.55)points]were lower than the control group[(3.76 ±0.78)points,(2.98 ± 0.89)points,t=3.45,2.38,all P<0.05].Postoperative 24h,48 h,the Ramsay scores between the two groups had no significant difference(P>0.05).The sedation satisfaction of the observation group (96.67%)was higher than the control group (86.67%),the incidence rate of delirium and delirium average score [3.33%,(15.11 ± 2.03)points]were lower than the control group[13.33%,(19.23 ±2.21 )points],the differences were significant between the two groups (t =4.32,4.32,3.27,all P<0.05 ).After treatment,the adverse reactions were mainly bradycardia,nausea,vomiting,drowsiness,respiratory depression,urinary retention.The overall incidence rate of adverse reactions between the two groups had no significant difference (P >0.05 ).Conclusion The effect of 1 .0μg·kg-1 · h-1 concentration dexmedetomidine within 24h of postoperative analgesia sedative is best,it can reduce the incidence of postoperative delirium,and without obvious drug side effects.

The paper described the periodic progress of public hospitals reform in Anhui province,and analyzed the difficulties encountered,proposing measures and recommendations.These include reasonable adjustment of medicine prices for betterment of public hospital compensation mechanism; toplevel design in supportive measures of county-level public hospital reform; breakthrough of existing personnel system to ease shortage of medical staff in primary institutions; encouragement of diversified investment in medical sector to invite private resources into public hospital reform.

Photodynamic therapy (PDT), because of its good targeting, minimal invasion, and safety, is becoming a very active area in cancer prevention and treatment, in which the photosensitizers have proved to be the core element for PDT. We developed a new HPLC method for analyzing porphyrin photosensitizers using Shiseido Capcell PAK C18 (150 mm x 4.6 mm, 5 µm) as the column at 30 °C, methanol-1% aqueous solution of acetic acid as the mobile phase in a flow rate of 1.0 mL · min(-1) in a gradient elution mode, and the detection wavelength at 380 nm. This method, showing good specificity, precision, accuracy and robusty via methodology validations, can be applied to the purity test and assay of porphyrin photosensitizers, and has played a key guide role in the R&D of the new porphyrin photosensitizer--sinoporphyrin sodium.

Objective To compare the differences and clinical value of prognostic evaluation between American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging system 7th edition and 8th edition for gastric cancer (GC).Methods The retrospective case-control study was conducted.The clinicopathological data of 1 383 GC patients who were admitted to the First People's Hospital of Changzhou between January 2008 and August 2012 were collected.Distal gastrectomy,proximal gastrectomy + pyloroplasty or total gastrectomy were performed according to preoperative evaluation and intraoperative exploration.Observation indicators:(1) surgical and postoperative situations;(2) follow-up and survival situations;(3) T staging comparison between AJCC TNM staging system 7th edition and 8th edition;(4) N staging comparison of AJCC TNM staging system 8th edition;(5) prognostic analysis in N staging of AJCC TNM staging system 8th edition;(6) TNM staging comparison between AJCC TNM staging system 7th edition and 8th edition;(7) prognostic analysis in different TNM staging between AJCC TNM staging system 7th edition and 8th edition.Follow-up using outpatient examination and telephone interview was performed to detect postoperative survival up to October 2017.Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as x ± s.Measurement data with skewed distribution were described as M (range).The survival curve and survival rate were respectively drawn and calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method,and the Log-rank test was used for survival analysis.Results (1) Surgical and postoperative situations:1 383 GC patients underwent successful radical gastrectomy,including 923 with distal gastrectomy,165 with proximal gastrectomy and 295 with total gastrectomy.Of 1 383 patients,115 with postoperative complications were improved by symptomatic treatment,including 87 with surgical complications and 28 with non-surgical complications.Postoperative pathological examinations:total number of intraoperative lymph node dissection and number of lymph node metastasis were 25± 12 and 7±4;577 didn't have lymph node metastasis and 806 had regional lymph node metastasis;308 were in early GC and 1 075 in advanced GC.(2) Follow-up and survival situations:1 383 patients were followed up for 1-117 months,with a median time of 34 months.The 1-,3-and 5-year survival rates of 1 383 patients were respectively 90.5％,71.9％ and 61.1％.(3) T staging comparison between AJCC TNM staging system 7th edition and 8th edition:T staging definition between AJCC TNM staging system 7th edition and 8th edition was identical.T staging of 1 383 patients:308,192,65,628 and 190 were respectively detected in T1,T2,T3,T4a and T4b stagings.(4) N staging comparison between AJCC TNM staging system 7th edition and 8th edition:N staging definition between AJCC TNM staging system 7th edition and 8th edition was identical.N staging of 1 383 patients:577,255,207,230 and 114 were respectively detected in N0,N1,N2,N3a and N3b stagings.N3a and N3b were classified as N3 staging of AJCC TNM staging system 7thedition,but they were classified as independent staging of AJCC TNM staging system 8th edition.(5) Prognostic analysis in N staging of AJCC TNM staging system 8th edition:5-year survival rate of patients in N0,N1,N2,N3a and N3b stagings was respectively 85.6％,76.5％,59.4％,45.2％ and 32.5％ based on AJCC TNM staging system 8th edition,with a statistically significant difference in survival (x2 =394.400,P＜0.05).There was a statistically significant difference between N0 and N 1 stagings (x2 =45.630,P＜0.05),between N 1 and N2 stagings (x2 =19.470,P＜0.05),between N2 and N3a stagings (x2 =7.602,P＜0.05) and between N3a and N3b stagings (x2=13.020,P＜0.05).(6) TNM staging comparison between AJCC TNM staging system 7th edition and 8th edition:TNM staging of 366 patients had changes,including 2 in T1N3b staging,2 in T2N3b staging,18 in T3N3b staging,120 in T4aN2 staging,149 in T4aN3a staging,34 in T4bN0 staging and 41 in T4bN2 staging;364 were detected in staging Ⅲ in 7th edition and 8th edition,and sub-staging of staging Ⅲ had a change;2 in T1N3b of ⅡB staging were redistricted into Ⅲ B staging based on AJCC TNM staging system 8th edition.(7) Prognostic analysis in different TNM staging between AJCC TNM staging system 7th edition and 8th edition:according to 7th edition,cases and 5-year survival rate were respectively 247,89.5％ in Ⅰ A staging and 147,83.7％ in Ⅰ B staging and 77,75.9％ in ⅡA staging and 207,70.5％ in ⅡB staging and 136,61.0％ in ⅢA staging and 236,37.5％ in Ⅲ B staging and 333,35.4％ in Ⅲ C staging,with a statistically significant difference in survival among sub-stagings (x2 =228.800,P＜0.05).There was a statistically significant difference in survival among Ⅰ,Ⅱ and Ⅲ stagings (x2=189.000,P＜0.05) and between ⅢA and ⅢB or ⅢC stagings (x2=22.710,18.010,P＜0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in survival between Ⅰ A and Ⅰ B stagings (x2=0.179,P＞0.05),between Ⅱ A and Ⅱ B stagings (x2 =0.265,P＞0.05),and between Ⅲ B and Ⅲ C stagings (x2 =1.550,P＞0.05).According to 8th edition,cases and 5-year survival rate were respectively 247,89.5％ in Ⅰ A staging and 147,83.7％ in Ⅰ B staging and 77,75.9％ in Ⅱ A staging and 205,70.7％ in Ⅱ B staging and 288,53.8％ in ⅢA staging and 258,37.3％ in ⅢB staging and 161,28.5％ in ⅢC staging,with a statistically significant difference in survival among sub-stagings (x2=234.900,P ＜ 0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in survival between Ⅰ A and Ⅰ B stagings (x2 =0.179,P＞0.05) and between Ⅱ A and ⅡB stagings (x2 =0.564,P＞0.05).There was statistically significant differences in survival between Ⅲ A and Ⅲ B or ⅢC stagings (x2 =29.790,43.060,P＜0.05) and between Ⅲ B and Ⅲ C stagings (x2 =7.494,P＜0.05).Further analysis showed that changes of TNM staging system between 7th edition and 8th edition were in T3N3b,T4aN2,T4aN3a,T4bN0 and T4bN2 stagings,5-year survival rate in above stagings was respectively 16.7％,35.8％,30.2％,47.1％ and 26.8％,with statistically significant differences in survival between T3N3b and T4aN2,T4aN3a,T4bN0 and T4bN2 stagings (x2 =19.590,8.039,12.070,3.853,P＜0.05),between T4aN2 and T4aN3a,T4bN2 stagings (x2 =6.529,3.859,P ＜ 0.05),between T4aN3a and T4bN0 stagings (x2 =10.400,P＜0.05) and between T4bN0 and T4bN2 stagings (x2=4.636,P＜0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in survival between T4aN2 and T4bN0 stagings (x2 =3.607,P＞0.05) and between T4aN3a and T4bN2 stagings (x2 =0.029,P＞0.05).Conclusions Compared with AJCC TNM staging system 7th edition,N3a and N3b stagings are classified as independent staging in AJCC TNM staging system 8th edition,and 8th edition is more accurate in prognostic evaluation of GC patients in stage Ⅲ.

Objective: To construct the mutants of ARID1A gene, which is an important component in human chromosomal remodeling complex Switch/Sucrose Non Fermentable (SWI/SNF), and identify their overexpression in liver cancer HepG2 cells. Methods: Overlap PCR was used to construct domain truncated mutantss pcDNA6-ARID1A/ΔARID and pcDNA6-ARID1A/ΔD UF3518 based on wild type plasmids pcDNA6-ARID1A. Lipofectionmethod was used to transfect the wild type and mutants into HepG2. Real-time PCR and western blotting were used to confirm the overexpression of ARID1A and the mutants. Results: SDS-PAGE and sequencingresult confirmed the successful construction of pcDNA6-ARID1A/ΔARID and pcDNA6-ARID1A/ΔDUF3518. Real-time PCR and western blottingresult confirmed the overexpression of both mRNA and protein of wild type ARID1A and ARID1A/ΔARID. The mRNA levels indicated that ARID1A/Δ DUF3518 were overexpressed, but the protein levels were quite low. Conclusions Functional domain truncated mutants of ARID1A were successfully constructed. Overexpression of wild type ARID1A and ARID1A/ΔARID in liver cancer HepG2 cells was successful. Loss of ARID1A/ΔDUF3518 protein suggest that DUF3518 may contribute to the protein structure stability.