1.Prognostic Factors in Patients with Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma Treated with Icotinib
Hongbin ZHANG ; Lingling ZHU ; Jiong XIE ; Hongmei CAI ; Qiaoxia JI ; Xiangcun LIANG ; Hua LI ; Yuan WANG ; Min ZHAO
Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment 2022;49(11):1153-1158
Objective To investigate the relationship between the treatment of EGFR-TKI icotinib and the prognosis of advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR mutation. Methods Patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma who had EGFR19 and 21 gene mutations and were treated with EGFR-TKI icotinib were enrolled. The relationships of clinical features, EGFR gene mutation subtypes, and different sites with patients'prognosis were analyzed. Results A total of 101 patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma were included in this study, including 58 cases (57.4%) of EGFR gene exon 19 deletion mutation (EGFR Del19) and 43 cases (42.6%) of EGFR gene exon 21 point mutation (EGFR L858R). The objective response rate was 63.4%. The mPFS and mOS were 13 months and 27 months, respectively. In addition, the mPFS and mOS of EGFR Del19 and EGFR19 mutation 746-750 were higher than those of EGFR L858R and other EGFR mutations, respectively. Meanwhile, multivariate analysis showed that the number of metastatic sites and pleural metastasis were independent influencing factors of patients'OS (
2.Reform and exploration of teaching methods for eight-year program medical students' early exposure to clinical practice
Pian YE ; Xin ZHENG ; Dongliang YANG ; Lei ZHAO ; Cheng PENG ; Chunxia GUO ; Ting LIU ; Xiangnian JI ; Qiaoxia TONG
Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research 2023;22(3):384-388
Objective:To explore the effect of early clinical clerkship training in the early exposure to clinical practice of eight-year program medical students.Methods:Experimental control method was used in this study. A total of 120 eight-year program medical students in the third year of Batch 2014 to 2016 from the Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology were selected as the research objects. The students of each grade were randomly selected by computer and divided into experimental group and control group, with 20 students in each group. Before early clinical exposure, the experimental group received 16 class hours of early clinical clerkship training, while the control group did not receive early clinical clerkship training. After the early clinical exposure, the clinical diagnosis and treatment ability of the two groups of students was compared. SPSS 24.0 software was used for t test. Results:The scores of medical history inquiry of experimental group and control group were [(17.45±1.96) points and (15.95±1.93) points; (18.30±1.03) points and (16.75±1.86) points; (17.95±1.36) points and (16.40±1.60) points, respectively]. The physical examination scores were [(17.75±1.65) points and (16.05±1.64) points; (17.85±1.18) points and (16.80±1.47) points; (18.25±1.16) points and (16.85±1.63) points, respectively]. The clinical judgment scores were [(18.15±1.42) points and (16.35±2.41) points; (18.20±1.24) points and (16.65±1.53) points; (18.35±1.35) points and (16.25±1.83) points, respectively]. Diagnosis and treatment scheme scores were [(17.15±1.57) points and (14.55±2.56) points; (17.30±1.42) points and (15.90±1.48) points; (17.80±1.06) points and (16.35±1.87) points, respectively]. The scores of communication skills were [(17.95±1.15) points and (17.00±1.19) points; (18.55±0.83) points and (17.45±1.50) points; (18.45±1.00) points and (17.45±1.23) points, respectively], with statistically significant differences (all P<0.05). Conclusion:The application of early clinical clerkship training in the early exposure to clinical practice of eight-year program medical students can improve the quality of students' clerkship.
3.Copy number variants of ABCF1, IL17REL, and FCGR3A are associated with the risk of gout.
Zheng DONG ; Yuan LI ; Jingru ZHOU ; Shuai JIANG ; Yi WANG ; Yulin CHEN ; Dongbao ZHAO ; Chengde YANG ; Qiaoxia QIAN ; Yanyun MA ; Hongjun HE ; Hengdong JI ; Yajun YANG ; Xiaofeng WANG ; Xia XU ; Yafei PANG ; Hejian ZOU ; Li JIN ; Feng ZHANG ; Jiucun WANG
Protein & Cell 2017;8(6):467-470