Objective:To systematically evaluate the recurrence risk prediction model of diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) .Methods:Research on DFU recurrence risk prediction models was electronically searched in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, and China Biomedical Service System. The search period was from database establishment to July 20, 2023. Two researchers independently screened literature and conducted data extraction and quality evaluation using the prediction model research data extraction table and the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) .Results:A total of 8 articles were included, including 14 models. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve included in the model ranged from 0.660 to 0.940. The most common five predictors in the model were ulcers location, glycosylated hemoglobin, smoking, combined peripheral neuropathy and diabetes course. All 8 articles had a high risk of bias, mainly due to insufficient sample size, improper handling and reporting of missing data, and a lack of internal validation, which might lead to overfitting of the model. Only one article was subjected to external validation.Conclusions:The research on DFU recurrence risk prediction models is still in the development stage, and the predictive performance of various studies is still acceptable, but there is a high risk of bias. Future research still needs to use rigorous statistical analysis methods to construct new risk prediction models and improve internal and external validation.

Objective To systematically retrieve and integrate the best evidence of enteral and parenteral nutrition support in adult patients with severe bums.Methods 2 nursing master students who had studied evidence-based nursing systematically searched the clinical decisions,recommended practices,guidelines,expert consensuses,systematic reviews,evidence summaries and other evidences on enteral and parenteral nutrition support for adult patients with severe bums in domestic and foreign guideline networks,relevant institutional websites and databases.The retrieval time was from the establishment of the databases to April 2023.2 researchers who had obtained master's degrees and undergone systematic evidence-based training in Fudan University used the appraisal of guidelines for research and evaluation n and JBI critical appraisal tools to evaluate the methodological quality,and extracted and summarized the evidence according to the theme.Results A total of 28 articles were included,including l clinical decision,9 guidelines,3 expert consensuses,9 systematic reviews,and 6 evidence summaries.A total of 20 pieces of evidence were summarized from 6 aspects:nutritional risk screening and assessment,energy requirement calculation,timing and route of nutritional support,nutrient intake,nutritional support monitoring and effect evaluation.Conclusion The best evidence of enteral and parenteral nutrition support for adult patients with severe burns summarized in this study is more comprehensive and scientific.It is suggested that in clinical application,targeted screening should be carried out according to the promotion and hindering factors of evidence,so as to scientifically carry out nutritional support for adult patients with severe burns.