1.Effect of sorafenib combined with thalidomide on angiogenesis in chick chorioallantoic membrane
Zhenya GUO ; Junfeng YE ; Qiankun XIE
Journal of Clinical Hepatology 2016;32(5):908-910
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of sorafenib and/or thalidomide on angiogenesis in chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM). MethodsWhite eggs incubated for 7 days were used to establish a CAM model. The model eggs were randomly divided blank control group, sorafenib group, thalidomide group, and sorafenib/thalidomide group. After treatment, each egg was incubated for another 2 days. The CAM samples were collected and fixed to take their pictures under a microscope, and the vascular coverage of each sample was calculated. Comparison between these groups was made by analysis of variance, and comparison between each two groups was made by SNK-q test. ResultsThe thalidomide group or sorafenib group had significantly lower vascular coverage than the blank control group (30.2%±2.9% or 26.5%±2.1% vs 38.3%±2.7%, P<0.05). The sorafenib/thalidomide group had significantly lower vascular coverage than the thalidomide group or sorafenib group (12.6%±1.5% vs 30.2%±2.9% or 26.5%±2.1%, P<0.05). ConclusionBoth sorafenib and thalidomide have a good anti-angiogenic effect on CAM, but a combination of the two drugs shows better efficacy.
3.Clinical effect of two fixation methods by anterolateral approach in the treatment of Rüedi-Allg?wer Ⅱ Pilon fracture
Shengkun HONG ; Wei WANG ; Feixiong HE ; Jun XIE ; Jinku GUO ; Zhiqiang FU ; Qiankun JIN
Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine 2021;44(11):972-977
Objective:To investigate the clinical effect of primary debridement combined with external fixation and secondary sequential internal fixation in the treatment of Rüedi-Allg?wer Ⅱ Pilon fracture.Methods:The clinical data of 36 patients with Rüedi-Allg?wer Ⅱ Pilon fracture from January 2017 to December 2019 in the People′s Hospital of Quzhou City, Zhejiang Province were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 16 patients were treated with primary debridement with calcaneal traction and secondary internal fixation (internal fixation group), and 20 patients were treated with primary debridement combined with external fixation and secondary sequential internal fixation (combined fixation group). The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, time of full weight bearing, fracture healing time, American Society of Foot and Ankle Surgery (AOFAS) posterior ankle foot function score, visual analogue score (VAS), reduction quality (Burwell-Charnley score) and incidence of complication were compared between 2 groups.Results:The patients were followed up for 6 to 18 (10.7 ± 2.8) months. The time of full weight bearing and fracture healing time in combined fixation group were significantly shorter than those in internal fixation group: (7.2 ± 1.9) weeks vs. (9.4 ± 2.1) weeks and (3.4 ± 0.8) months vs. (4.1 ± 1.2) months, and there were statistical differences ( P<0.05 or <0.01); there were no statistical differences in operative time, intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage volume between 2 groups ( P>0.05). There was no statistical difference in AOFAS posterior ankle foot function score 1 month after surgery between 2 groups ( P>0.05); the AOFAS posterior ankle foot function score 3 and 6 month after surgery in combined fixation group was significantly higher than that in internal fixation group: (86.4 ± 1.7) scores vs. (75.7 ± 1.2) scores and (93.6 ± 2.2) scores vs. (82.1 ± 1.9) scores, and there was statistical difference ( P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in VAS between 2 groups ( P>0.05). There were no statistical differences in rate of reduction satisfaction and incidence of complication between 2 groups ( P>0.05). Conclusions:The primary debridement combined with external fixation and secondary sequential internal fixation for the treatment of Rüedi-Allg?wer Ⅱ Pilon fracture is conducive to the rapid recovery, which is worthy of extensive clinical promotion.
4.Characterization of a novel allele of Aw33 subtype of the ABO blood group.
Yongkui KONG ; Xiaohong CAI ; Li WANG ; Ying XIE ; Xue LIU ; Yanli CHANG ; Qiankun YANG ; Xianping LYU
Chinese Journal of Medical Genetics 2020;37(5):570-572
OBJECTIVE:
To explore the molecular basis for an A subtype of the ABO blood group.
METHODS:
The forward and reverse typing of the ABO blood group were identified by gel card and test tube methods. The ABO gene of the patient was detected by PCR-sequence specific primer (PCR-SSP). Exons 1 to 7 of the ABO gene was amplified by PCR and sequenced. The ABO gene was also subjected to subclone sequencing for haplotype analysis.
RESULTS:
The patient's red cells showed weak agglutination with anti-A but non-agglutination with anti-B. The patient's serum showed 1+ agglutination with A cells and 4+ agglutination with B cells. Based on above serological characteristics, the patient was defined as Aw subtype of the ABO blood group. Sequencing analysis showed that the patient was heterozygous for c.106G>T, c.188G>A, c.189C>T, c.220C>T, c.297A>G, c.467C>T, c.543G>C, c.646T>A, c.681G>A, c.771C>T, c.829G>A, in addition with a c.261G deletion. Combined with the result of subclone sequencing, the ABO genotype of the patient was determined as ABO*AW.33. new/O.01.02, which harbored c.467C>T and c.543G>C variants compared with ABO*A1.01 and c.543G>C variant compared with ABO*A1.02. The novel allele has been submitted to GenBank with an accession number of MK302122.
CONCLUSION
A novel allele of Aw33 subtype has been identified with its GTA transferase gene harboring c.467C>T and c.543G>C variants compared with A1.01.
ABO Blood-Group System
;
genetics
;
Alleles
;
Exons
;
genetics
;
Genotype
;
Humans
;
Phenotype
5.Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital Experts Consensus on the Management of Ground-Glass Nodules Suspected as Lung Adenocarcinoma (Version 1).
Gening JIANG ; Chang CHEN ; Yuming ZHU ; Dong XIE ; Jie DAI ; Kaiqi JIN ; Yingran SHEN ; Haifeng WANG ; Hui LI ; Lanjun ZHANG ; Shugeng GAO ; Keneng CHEN ; Lei ZHANG ; Xiao ZHOU ; Jingyun SHI ; Hao WANG ; Boxiong XIE ; Lei JIANG ; Jiang FAN ; Deping ZHAO ; Qiankun CHEN ; Liang DUAN ; Wenxin HE ; Yiming ZHOU ; Hongcheng LIU ; Xiaogang ZHAO ; Peng ZHANG ; Xiong QIN
Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer 2018;21(3):147-159
Background and objective As computed tomography (CT) screening for lung cancer becomes more common in China, so too does detection of pulmonary ground-glass nodules (GGNs). Although anumber of national or international guidelines about pulmonary GGNs have been published,most of these guidelines are produced by respiratory, oncology or radiology physicians, who might not fully understand the progress of modern minimal invasive thoracic surgery, and these current guidelines may overlook or underestimate the value of thoracic surgery in the management of pulmonary GGNs. In addition, the management for pre-invasive adenocarcinoma is still controversial. Based onthe available literature and experience from Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, we composed this consensus about diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary GGNs. For lesions which are considered as adenocarcinoma in situ, chest thin layer CT scan follow-up is recommended and resection can only be adopt in some specific cases and excision should not exceed single segment resection. For lesions which are considered as minimal invasive adenocarcinoma, limited pulmonary resection or lobectomy is recommended. For lesions which are considered as early stage invasive adenocarcinoma, pulmonary resection is recommend and optimal surgical methods depend on whether ground glass component exist, location, volume and number of the lesions and physical status of patients. Principle of management of multiple pulmonary nodules is that primary lesions should be handled with priority, with secondary lesions taking into account.
.
Adenocarcinoma
;
diagnosis
;
diagnostic imaging
;
surgery
;
Adenocarcinoma of Lung
;
China
;
Consensus
;
Hospitals
;
Humans
;
Lung Neoplasms
;
diagnosis
;
diagnostic imaging
;
surgery
;
Physicians
;
psychology
;
Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography
;
Practice Guidelines as Topic
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Solitary Pulmonary Nodule
;
diagnosis
;
diagnostic imaging
;
surgery
;
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
6.Comparison of segmentectomy versus lobectomy for ≤2 cm lung adenocarcinoma with micropapillary and solid subtype negative by intraoperative frozen sections: A multi-center randomized controlled trial
Chang CHEN ; Yuming ZHU ; Gening JIANG ; Haifeng WANG ; Dong XIE ; Hang SU ; Long XU ; Deping ZHAO ; Liang DUAN ; Boxiong XIE ; Chunyan WU ; Likun HOU ; Huikang XIE ; Junqiang FAN ; Xuedong ZHANG ; Weirong SHI ; Honggang KE ; Lei ZHANG ; Hao WANG ; Xuefei HU ; Qiankun CHEN ; Lei JIANG ; Wenxin HE ; Yiming ZHOU ; Xiong QIN ; Xiaogang ZHAO ; Hongcheng LIU ; Peng ZHANG ; Yang YANG ; Ming LIU ; Hui ZHENG
Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2021;28(11):1292-1298
Objective To compare the clinical effects of segmentectomy and lobectomy for ≤2 cm lung adenocarcinoma with micropapillary and solid subtype negative by intraoperative frozen sections. Methods The patients with adenocarcinoma who received segmentectomy or lobectomy in multicenter from June 2020 to March 2021 were included. They were divided into two groups according to a random number table, including a segmentectomy group (n=119, 44 males and 75 females with an average age of 56.6±8.9 years) and a lobectomy group (n=115, 43 males and 72 females with an average of 56.2±9.5 years). The clinical data of the patients were analyzed. Results There was no significant difference in the baseline data between the two groups (P>0.05). No perioperative death was found. There was no statistical difference in the operation time (111.2±30.0 min vs. 107.3±34.3 min), blood loss (54.2±83.5 mL vs. 40.0±16.4 mL), drainage duration (2.8±0.6 d vs. 2.6±0.6 d), hospital stay time (3.9±2.3 d vs. 3.7±1.1 d) or pathology staging (P>0.05) between the two groups. The postoperative pulmonary function analysis revealed that the mean decreased values of forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in one second percent predicted in the segmentectomy group were significantly better than those in the lobectomy group (0.2±0.3 L vs. 0.4±0.3 L, P=0.005; 0.3%±8.1% vs. 2.9%±7.4%, P=0.041). Conclusion Segmentectomy is effective in protecting lungs function, which is expected to improve life quality of patients.