Objective To evaluate the effects of penehyclidine hydrochloride on synthesis and release of high mobility group protein box 1 (HMGB1) in macrophages induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in mice.Methods RAW264.7 cells obtained from mice were seeded in the culture dishes.After being cultured for 24 h,the cells were randomly divided into 5 groups (n =6 each) using a random number table.The cells were incubated routinely in group C.The cells were incubated in the presence of LPS 500 ng/ml (group LPS),LPS 500 ng/ml + penehyclidine hydrochloride 0.5 μg/ml (group P1),LPS 500 ng/ml + penehyclidine hydrochloride 2 μg/ml (group P2),or LPS 500 ng/ml + penehyclidine hydrochloride 5 μg/ml (group P3).All the cells were incubated for 24 h.The cells and supernatant were collected.The proliferation of the cells was measured by CCK-8 assay,HMGB1 mRNA expression in the cells was detected by RT-PCR,NF-κBp65 protein expression in the cells was detected by Western blot and the concentration of HMGB1 in the supernatant was detected by ELISA.Results Compared with group C,the expression of HMGB1 mRNA and NF-κBp65 protein in the cells was significantly upregulated,and the concentration of HMGB1 in the supernatant was increased in LPS,P1,P2 and P3 groups (P ＜ 0.05).Compared with group LPS,the expression of HMGB1 mRNA and NF-κBp65 protein in the cells was significantly down-regulated,and the concentration of HMGB1 in the supernatant was decreased in P2 and P3 groups (P ＜ 0.05).Compared with group P1,the expression of HMGB1 mRNA and NF-κBp65 protein in the cells was significantly down-regulated,and the concentration of HMGB1 in the supernatant was decreased in P2 and P3 groups (P ＜ 0.05).There was no significant difference in the indicators mentioned above between group P2 and group P3 (P ＞ 0.05).There was no significant difference in the proliferation of the cells among the 5 groups (P ＞ 0.05).Conclusion Penehyclidine hydrochloride can reduce the synthesis and release of HMGB1 in macrophages induced by LPS through inhibiting NF-κB activation in mice.

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of acupuncture combined with tropisetron in treating nausea and vomiting induced by carboprost tromethamine in cesarean section. Methods Sixty-six patients aged 22-40 yr who received carboprost tromethamine and developed nausea and vomiting during cesarean section under lumbar anesthesia, were randomly divided into 3 groups(n=22 each): acupuncture group (group A), tropisetron group(group T)and acupuncture+ tropisetron group(group AT). In group A, 09% normal saline 2 ml was intravenously injected immediately, acupuncture was given at Renzhong, Neiguan and Hegu acupoints with lifting thrusting twirling the acupuncture needle for 10 min. In group T, tropisetron 10 mg was intravenously injected immediately, the needle was placed on Renzhong, Neiguan and Hegu skin surface. In group AT, tropisetron 10 mg was intravenously injected immediately, acupunc-ture was given at Renzhong, Neiguan and Hegu acupoints with lifting thrusting twirling the acupuncture nee-dle for 10 min. The nausea and vomiting score was assessed before anesthesia induction(T0), when nause-a or vomiting occurred(T1)and at 1, 3, 5 and 15 min after acupuncture or administration(T1-5). The degree of patient′s satisfaction with therapeutic effect was recorded. Results Compared with group A, the nausea and vomiting scores were significantly decreased at T4, and the patient's satisfaction score was in-creased in group AT(P<005). Compared with group T, the nausea and vomiting scores were significantly decreased at T2-4and the patient's satisfaction score was increased in group AT(P <005). Conclusion Acupuncture combined with ondansetron can quickly and effectively relieve the nausea and vomiting induced by carboprost tromethamine during cesarean section.

Objective:To explore the effects of conflicting stimuli generated by different chromatic lights on visual display terminal (VDT) on accommodative response and microfluctuation of myopes and emmetropes, and to investigate the possible relationship between chromatic light, accommodation and the development and progression of myopia.Methods:A non-randomized controlled trial was conducted.Forty-one subjects aged 22 to 30 years old were enrolled, including 19 emmetropes in emmetropic group and 22 myopes in myopic group.The subjects had the normal color vision and no ocular organic diseases.The interventions were screens of different colors.There were 7 chromatic light conditions, including 3 monochromatic lights (red, green, blue), 3 bichromatic lights (red+ green, red+ blue, green+ blue) and 1 polychromatic light (white=red+ green+ blue). Subjects were asked to look at a black E target on a VDT at a distance of 33 cm for more than 20 seconds.The background color of the VDT was changed randomly in the 7 chromatic light conditions.The accommodative responses were recorded with the Grand Seiko WAM-5500 automatic infrared refractor every 0.2 seconds and the accommodative microfluctuation was calculated as the standard deviation of the accommodative response.Accommodative response and accommodative microfluctuation under different chromatic light conditions were compared.This study adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki.The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine (No.2019-1564). Written informed consent was obtained from each subject.Results:No statistically significant difference was found in the accommodative response between the two groups ( Fgroup=2.626, P=0.113). There was a statistically significant difference under different chromatic light conditions between the two groups ( Flight=39.070, P<0.01). There were similar trends in the effects of various color lights in both groups, with the largest accommodative response under monochromatic red light, followed by the bichromatic light containing red light, and then the smallest accommodative response under monochromatic blue light, and the differences were statistically significant (all at P<0.05). The accommodative microfluctuations under red, green, blue, red+ blue, red+ green, blue+ green and white light conditions were (0.142±0.033), (0.128±0.038), (0.131±0.043), (0.139±0.039), (0.127±0.034), (0.131±0.043) and (0.139±0.042)D in emmetropic group, and (0.178±0.043), (0.164±0.043), (0.159±0.039), (0.174±0.042), (0.166±0.036), (0.159±0.031) and (0.174±0.035)D in myopic group, respectively, showing statistically significant differences between them ( Fgroup=12.146, P<0.01; Flight=2.782, P<0.05). The accommodative microfluctuations under the 7 light conditions were higher in myopic group than in emmetropic group, and the differences were statistically significant (all at P<0.05). In myopes, the accommodative microfluctuation was the largest under red light, which was significantly larger than that under blue light, and was the smallest under blue+ green light (all at P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the accommodative microfluctuation between bichromatic light and its two monochromatic lights, or between the polychromatic light (white light) and its three monochromatic lights (all at P>0.05). There was no significant effect of various chromatic lights on the accommodative microfluctuation in emmetropic group (all at P>0.05). Conclusions:The accommodative microfluctuation is greater in myopes than in emmetropes.The stimuli produced by long-wavelength light cause larger accommodative microfluctuation, while conflicting stimuli generated by different chromatic lights do not increase accommodative microfluctuation.